Skip to main content
Log in

Endoskopische Therapie gastroduodenaler neuroendokriner Neoplasien

Endoscopic therapy for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Neuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) stellen eine Gruppe potenziell maligner Tumoren dar, deren Manifestationsort in allen Abschnitten des Gastrointestinaltraktes, des Pankreas sowie des bronchopulmonalen Systems liegt. Im Vergleich mit anderen Subentitäten, wie z. B. pankreatischen oder jejunoilealen NEN, besitzen gastroduodenale NEN meist eine sehr günstige Prognose. Im Magen können 4 und im Duodenum 5 verschiedene Typen neuroendokriner Neoplasien unterschieden werden. Sie variieren wiederum in ihrem malignen Potenzial und damit auch in ihrem therapeutischen Ansatz. Endoskopische Verfahren haben bei dieser Entität aufgrund des einfachen Zuganges neben ihrer diagnostischen auch eine therapeutische Bedeutung. Neben der einfachen Abtragung kleiner Polypen (< 1 cm) mittels Zange oder Schlinge stehen mittlerweile auch invasivere Methoden („endoscopic mucosal resection“/„endoscopic submucosal dissection“) zur Verfügung, die sogar eine Abtragung von Läsionen bis 2 cm erlauben. Wichtige Kriterien im Rahmen der Risikoevaluation für eine alleinige endoskopische Therapie stellen bei gastralen NEN, neben der Größe der Läsion, der Ausschluss eines invasiven Wachstums mittels Endosonographie sowie die Tumorbiologie (NET-G1/G2 vs. NEC-G3) dar. Im Duodenum sollten nach Ausschluss o. g. Risikofaktoren dagegen ausschließlich Tumoren außerhalb der Ampulla vateri primär endoskopisch behandelt werden. Für periampulläre NEN stellt dagegen ein chirurgisches Vorgehen die Therapie der Wahl dar. Als individueller Ansatz ist in Einzelfällen auch ein kombiniert endoskopisch-laparoskopisches Resektionsverfahren denkbar. Im Rahmen der Nachsorge sind regelmäßige endoluminale Untersuchungen notwendig, da es insbesondere beim Typ-1-NEN des Magens häufig zu Rezidiven kommt.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) represent a group of potentially malignant tumors, which can be located in every section of the gastrointestinal tract, the pancreas and the bronchopulmonary system. Gastroduodenal NENs have a relatively good prognosis in comparison to other subentities, e.g. pancreatic or ileojejunal NENs. In the stomach there are four different types of NENs, while in the duodenum there are five types and all vary in the malignant potential and the therapeutic approach. Due to the simple access endoscopic methods not only have diagnostic but also important therapeutic relevance in this subgroup. Lesions smaller than 1 cm can easily be resected with forceps or snare resection and for larger lesions up to 2 cm more invasive strategies, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are available. Important criteria in gastric NEN for the risk evaluation of endoscopic treatment alone are the size of the lesion, depth of invasion and the tumor biology, e.g. neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1/G2 versus neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) G3. In duodenal NEN the aforementioned risk factors also apply and in addition only lesions outside the ampulla of Vater should be endoscopically resected whereas periampullary lesions need to be addressed surgically. As an individualized therapeutic approach the possibility of a combined endoscopic and laparoscopic resection technique exists. Follow-up endoscopic investigations are necessary, especially in gastric type 1 NENs, which have a tendency to relapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Klöppel G, Couvelard A, Perren A, Komminoth P, McNicol A-M, Nilsson O et al (2009) ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: towards a standardized approach to the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and their prognostic stratification. Neuroendocrinology 90(2):162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW et al (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449(4):395–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, Jensen RT, de Herder WW, Thakker RV et al (2008) Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol 9(1):61–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ploeckinger U, Kloeppel G, Wiedenmann B, Lohmann R (2009) The German NET-registry: an audit on the diagnosis and therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 90(4):349–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Niederle MB, Hackl M, Kaserer K, Niederle B (2010) Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. Endocr Relat Cancer 17(4):909–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klöppel G, Rindi G, Anlauf M, Perren A, Komminoth P (2007) Site-specific biology and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Virchows Arch 451(Suppl 1):S9–S27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. La Rosa S, Vanoli A (2015) Republished: gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and related precursor lesions. Postgrad Med J 91 (1073):163–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Thomas D, Strosberg JR, Pape U-F, Felder S, Tsolakis AV et al (2013) Metastatic type 1 gastric carcinoid: a real threat or just a myth? World J Gastroenterol 19(46):8687–8695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen WC, Warner RRP, Ward SC, Harpaz N, Divino CM, Itzkowitz SH et al (2015) Management and disease outcome of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors: the Mount Sinai experience. Dig Dis Sci 60(4):996–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Merola E, Sbrozzi-Vanni A, Panzuto F, D’Ambra G, Di Giulio E, Pilozzi E et al (2012) Type I gastric carcinoids: a prospective study on endoscopic management and recurrence rate. Neuroendocrinology 95(3):207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E, Rindi G, Kos-Kudla B, Knigge U et al (2012) ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 95(2):74–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crosby DA, Donohoe CL, Fitzgerald L, Muldoon C, Hayes B, O’Toole D et al (2012) Gastric neuroendocrine tumours. Dig Surg 29(4):331–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawrence B, Kidd M, Svejda B, Modlin I (2011) A clinical perspective on gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13(1):101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rindi G, Bordi C, Rappel S, La Rosa S, Stolte M, Solcia E (1996) Gastric carcinoids and neuroendocrine carcinomas: pathogenesis, pathology, and behavior. World J Surg 20(2):168–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maasberg S, Denecke T, Pascher A, Pape U-F (2012) Neuroendokrine Neoplasien des gastroentero-pankreatischen Systems. Onkol 18(7):627–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rindi G, Luinetti O, Cornaggia M, Capella C, Solcia E (1993) Three subtypes of gastric argyrophil carcinoid and the gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study. Gastroenterology 104(4):994–1006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M (2003) A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 97(4):934–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Toole D, Delle Fave G, Jensen RT (2012) Gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 26(6):719–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen RT, Rindi G, Arnold R, Lopes JM, Brandi ML, Bechstein WO et al (2006) Well-differentiated duodenal tumor/carcinoma (excluding gastrinomas). Neuroendocrinology 84(3):165–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheerer F, Schmitt W (2013) [Non-functional duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia in the proximal duodenum–case reports and proposal for a „high-risk-/low-risk-concept“ in the decision for local endoscopic therapy]. Z Gastroenterol 51(11):1240–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen RT, Niederle B, Mitry E, Ramage JK, Steinmuller T, Lewington V et al (2006) Gastrinoma (duodenal and pancreatic). Neuroendocrinology 84(3):173–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garbrecht N, Anlauf M, Schmitt A, Henopp T, Sipos B, Raffel A et al (2008) Somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas: incidence, types, biological behavior, association with inherited syndromes, and functional activity. Endocr Relat Cancer 15(1):229–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderloni A, Jovani M, Hassan C, Repici A (2014) Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 7:285–296

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee CK, Shim J-J, Jang JY (2013) Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 108(10):1593–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ntourakis D, Mavrogenis G (2015) Cooperative laparoscopic endoscopic and hybrid laparoscopic surgery for upper gastrointestinal tumors: current status. World J Gastroenterol 21(43):12482–12497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Campana D, Ravizza D, Ferolla P, Faggiano A, Grimaldi F, Albertelli M et al (2016) Clinical management of patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms associated with chronic atrophic gastritis: a retrospective, multicentre study. Endocrine 51:131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saund MS, Al Natour RH, Sharma AM, Huang Q, Boosalis VA, Gold JS (2011) Tumor size and depth predict rate of lymph node metastasis and utilization of lymph node sampling in surgically managed gastric carcinoids. Ann Surg Oncol 18(10):2826–2832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwon YH, Jeon SW, Kim GH, Kim JI, Chung I-K, Jee SR et al (2013) Long-term follow up of endoscopic resection for type 3 gastric NET. World J Gastroenterol 19(46):8703–8708

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Berna MJ, Annibale B, Marignani M, Luong TV, Corleto V, Pace A et al (2008) A prospective study of gastric carcinoids and enterochromaffin-like cell changes in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: identification of risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(5):1582–1591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U.-F. Pape.

Ethics declarations

Interessenskonflikte

Die Autoren geben an, dass keine Interessenskonflikte bestehen.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maasberg, S., Jürgensen, C., Scheerer, F. et al. Endoskopische Therapie gastroduodenaler neuroendokriner Neoplasien. Chirurg 87, 271–279 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0157-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0157-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation