Skip to main content
Log in

Regionale Versorgung des malignen Pleuramesothelioms

Ergebnisse aus dem Tumorzentrum Regensburg

Regional treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Results from the tumor centre Regensburg

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das maligne Pleuramesotheliom (MPM) ist ein häufig asbestassoziierter hochmaligner Tumor der Pleura parietalis mit einem Inzidenzhöhepunkt in den nächsten Jahren. Die chirurgischen Therapiemöglichkeiten sind aufgrund des meist fortgeschrittenen Tumorstadiums begrenzt.

Patienten und Methoden

Retrospektiv wurden alle Patienten mit MPM, welche dem Tumorzentrum Regensburg im Zeitraum Januar 1998 bis August 2011gemeldet wurden, analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden 118 Patienten (85 % männlich, mittleres Alter: 67 Jahre) mit zytologisch bzw. histologisch gesichertem MPM erfasst. Die Inzidenz des MPM im Tumorzentrum Regensburg lag bei ca. 0,8 pro 100.000 Einwohner, wobei deutliche regionale Unterschiede aufgrund arbeitsbedingter Asbestexposition bestanden. Bei 65 % der Patienten konnte eine frühere Asbestexposition anamnestisch nachgewiesen werden. Ein komplettes Staging wurde bei 81 Patienten (67 %) durchgeführt: Stadium I 9 %, Stadium II 22 %, Stadium III 23 % und Stadium IV 46 %. Bei 87 (74 %) Patienten wurde mindestens ein operativer Eingriff durchgeführt: diagnostische Thorakoskopie mit Biopsie (n = 37; 43 %), Tumordebulking bzw. Talkumpleurodese (n = 33; 38 %) und die potenziell kurative Resektion (n = 17; 19 %). Nach einem mittleren Follow-up von 20 Monaten lag die mediane Überlebenszeit bei 14 Monaten (1-JÜR[-Jahres-Überlebensrate] 62 %; 3-JÜR 15 %). Patienten nach kurativer Resektion hatten mit 18 Monaten ein signifikant besseres medianes Überleben.

Schlussfolgerung

Das MPM ist durch Schwerpunkte der industriellen Asbestexposition regional deutlich unterschiedlich verteilt. Das Screening und die Diagnostik sollten sich auf Standorte erhöhter Inzidenz konzentrieren, um durch eine frühzeitige Erkennung multimodale Therapiekonzepte zu ermöglichen.

Abstract

Introduction

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive, malignant tumor of the pleural surface and is strongly associated with asbestos exposure. Incidence of MPM will reach its peak over the coming years. Most patients present with advanced tumor stages and therefore surgical options are limited.

Patients and methods

Retrospective analysis of all patients with MPM reported to the tumor centre Regensburg between January 1998 and August 2011.

Results

A total of 118 patients (85 % male) with cytologically or histologically confirmed MPM were reported. The mean age at diagnosis was 67 years (range 45–84 years) and 65 % of patients had a history of asbestos exposure. The incidence of MPM at the tumor centre Regensburg was 0.8/100,000 inhabitants with obvious regional differences depending on asbestos exposure. Staging was completed in 81 patients (67 %): stage I 9 %, stage II 22 %, stage III 23 % and stage IV 46 %. Of the patients 87 (74 %) underwent at least one surgical procedure: diagnostic thoracoscopy with biopsy (n = 37, 43 %), debulking surgery or talcum pleurodesis (n = 33, 38 %) and potentially curative resection (n = 17, 19 %). After a mean follow-up of 20 months the overall median survival was 14 months (1 year survival rate 62 %, 3 year survival rate 15 %). Patients had a significantly better median survival of 18 months after curative resection.

Conclusions

The distribution of MPM varies according to regional and industrial asbestos exposure. Screening and diagnostics should concentrate on locations with higher incidence of MPM to facilitate surgical therapy in a multimodal treatment regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P (1960) Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Ind Med 17:260–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Neumann V, Gunthe S, Mulle KM et al (2001) Malignant mesothelioma – German mesothelioma register 1987–1999. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:383–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sohrab S, Hinterthaner M, Stamatis G et al (2000) Das maligne Pleuramesotheliom. Dtsch Arztebl 97:3257–3262

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peto J, Decarli A, La Vecchia C et al (1999) The European mesothelioma epidemic. Br J Cancer 79:666–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kent M, Rice D, Flores R (2008) Diagnosis, staging, and surgical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 9(2–3):158–170

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sackmann S (2010) Klinik und Diagnostik des malignen Pleuramesothelioms. Pneumologe 1–6

  7. Muers MF, Stevens RJ, Fisher P et al, MS01 Trial Management Group (2008) Active symptom control with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MS01): a multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 371:1658–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zauderer MG, Krug LM (2011) The evolution of multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 12:163–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sienel W, Kirschbaum A, Passlick B (2008) Multimodal therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma including extrapleural pneumonectomy. Zentralbl Chir 133(3):231–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gütz S (2010) Therapie des malignen Pleuramesothelioms: Medikamentöse und palliative Optionen. Pneumologe 1–9

  11. Leslie H, Sobin MKG, Wittekind C (Hrsg) (2009) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 7. Aufl. UICC International Union Against Cancer

  12. Neumann V, Rutten A, Scharmach M et al (2004) Factors influencing longterm survival in mesothelioma patients-results of the German mesothelioma register. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:191–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scherpereel A, Astoul P, Baas P et al (2010) Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Respir J 35(3):479–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Addis B, Roche H (2008) Problems in mesothelioma diagnosis. Histopathology 54:55–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ploenes T, Osei-Agyemang T, Nestle U et al (2012) Malignant pleural mesothelioma. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 137(10):481–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bölübkas S, Manegold C, Eberlein M et al (2009) Survival after trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: radical pleurectomy, chemotherapy with Cisplatin/Pemetrexed and radiotherapy. Lung Cancer 71:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J et al (2003) Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21:2636–2644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis P, Davies AM, Evans WK et al (2006) The use of chemotherapy in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and practice guideline. J Thorac Oncol 1:591–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Treasure T, Lang-Lazdunski L, Waller D et al (2011) Extra-pleural pneumonectomy versus no extra-pleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical outcomes of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) randomised feasibility study. Lancet Oncol 12(8):763–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flores M (2009) Surgical options in malignant pleural mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21(2):149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufman AJ, Flores RM (2011) Surgical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 12(2):201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schirren J, Muley T, Schneider P et al (1998) Treatment strategy in pleural mesothelioma. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 115:498–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R et al (2004) Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive extrapleural pneumonectomies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 128:138–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flores R, Krug L, Rosenzweig KE et al (2006) Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and postoperative high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II trial. J Thorac Oncol 1:289–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Flores RM, Pass HI, Seshan VE et al (2008) Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 663 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(3):620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bölükbas S, Eberlein M, Schirren J (2012) Prospective study on functional results after lung-sparing radical pleurectomy in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol 7(5):900–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sugarbaker DJ, Flores RM, Jaklitsch MT et al (1999) Resection margins, extrapleural nodal status, and cell type determine postoperative long-term survival in trimodality therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 183 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:54–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weder W, Stahel RA, Bernhard J et al (2007) Multicenter trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Oncol 18:1196–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rea F, Marulli G et al (2007) Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant hemi-thoracic radiation in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): feasibility and results. Lung Cancer 57:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krug LM, Pass HI, Rusch VW et al (2009) Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and radiation for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 27(18):3007–3013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Richards WG, Zellos L, Bueno R et al (2006) Phase I to II study of pleurectomy/decortication and intraoperative intracavitary hyperthermic cisplatin lavage for mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 24:1561–1567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hofmann HS, Wiebe K (2010) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy perfusion. Chirurg 81(6):557–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ried M, Potzger T, Braune N et al (2012) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy perfusion for malignant pleural tumors: perioperative management and clinical experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (Epub ahead of print)

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ried.

Additional information

Diese Arbeit wurde als Vortrag bei der 21. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie im September 2012 in Karlsruhe vorgestellt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ried, M., Speth, U., Potzger, T. et al. Regionale Versorgung des malignen Pleuramesothelioms. Chirurg 84, 987–993 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2518-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2518-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation