Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers

  • Full Papers
  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two different cultivation systems, aeroponics and hydroponics in greenhouse beds, were compared for the production of potato minitubers. Plants in the aeroponic system showed increased vegetative growth, delayed tuber formation and an extended vegetative cycle of about seven months after transplanting. Therefore in 1999, two production cycles were obtained with the hydroponic system, but only one with the aeroponic system. However, compared with total production in hydroponics, the tuber yield per plant in the aeroponic system was almost 70% higher and tuber number more than 2.5 fold higher. Average tuber weight was reduced by 33% in the aeroponic system. Advantages and possible problems with the aeroponic system for minituber production are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balamani, V., K. Veluthambi & B.W. Poovaiah, 1986. Effect of calcium on tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Plant Physiology 80: 856–858.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biddinger, E.J., C.M. Liu, R.J. Joly & K.G. Raghothama, 1998. Physiological and molecular responses of aeroponically grown tomato plants to phosphorus deficiency.Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123: 330–333.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y.D., S.G. Kang, Y.D. Kim, G.H. Shin & K.T. Kim, 1996. Effects of culture systems on growth and yield of cherry tomatoes in hydroponics.RDA Journal of Agricultural Science 38: 563–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., 1979. The ABC of NFT. Grower Books, London, 181 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 1990. Soilless culture for horticultural crop produccion. Plant Production and Protection paper n° 101, Rome, 188 pp.

  • Espinoza, N.O., R. Estrada, P. Tovar, J.E. Bryan & J. Dodds, 1984. Tissue culture micropropagation, conservation and export of potato germplasm. Specialized Technology Document CIP, Lima.

  • Gysi, C. & F. von Allmen, 1997. Balance of water and nutrients in tomatoes grown on soilless systems.Agrarforschung 4: 1 (supplement).

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J. & S.K. Lee, 1998. Growth and photosynthetic responses of three aerponically grown lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L.) to different rootzone temperatures and growth irradiances under tropical aerial conditions.Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73: 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.D., 1988. A current assessment ofin vitro culture and other rapid multiplication methods in North America and Europe.American Potato Journal 65: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B.A., E.E. Ewing & A.H. Senesac, 1983. Effects of leaf age, leaf area, and other factors on tuberization of cuttings from induced potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) shoots.Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 3193–3201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J.G., S.Y. Yang & S.Y. Kim, 1996a. Effects of nitrogen levels on the plant growth, tuberization and quality of potatoes grown in aeroponics.Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 37: 761–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J.G., S.Y. Kim, H.J. Kim, Y.H. Om & J.K. Kim, 1996b. Growth and tuberization of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars in aeroponic, deep flow technique and nutrient film technique culture systems.Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 37: 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.T., S.B. Kim, S.B. Ko & Y.B. Park, 1997. Effects of minituber picking intervals on the yield and tuber weight of potato grown in aeroponics.RDA Journal of Horticulture Science 39: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.S., E.M. Lee, M.A. Lee, I.S. Woo, C.S. Moon, Y.B. Lee & S.Y. Kim, 1999. Production of high quality potato plantlets by autotrophic culture for aeroponic systems.Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 123: 330–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen, W.J.M., 1995. Basic studies on the production and performance of potato minitubers. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 181 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugt, C., K.B.A. Bodlaender & G. Goodijk, 1964. Observation on the induction of secondgrowth in potato tubers.European Potato Journal 4: 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molitor, H.D., M. Fischer & A.P. Popadopoulos, 1999. Effect of several parameters on the growth of chrysanthemum stock plants in aeroponics. Volume I.Acta Horticulturae 481: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morard, P., 1995. Les cultures végétales hors sol.Publications Agricoles Agen, 481: p. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures.Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muro, J., V. Diaz, J.L. Goni & C. Lamsfus, 1997. Comparison of hydroponic culture and culture in a peat/sand mixture and the influence of nutrient solution and plant density on seed potato yields.Potato Research 40: 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H.S., M.H. Chiang & H.S. Park, 1997. Effects of form and concentration of nitrogen in aeroponic solution on growth, chlorophyll, nitrogen contents and enzyme activities inCucumis sativum L. plant.Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 38: 642–646.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N.A. & A.R. Krueger, 1968. An intermittent aeroponics system.Crop Science 28: 712–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli, P., 1997. Innovative propagation methods in seed tuber multiplication programmes.Potato Research 40: 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, H., 1978. Hydroponic food production. Woodbridge Press Publishing Company, Santa Barbara, California, USA, 287 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 6, Fourth edition, Vol 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., 846 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoggins, H.L. & H.A. Mills, 1998. Poinsettia growth, tissue nutrient concentration, and nutrient up take as influenced by nitrogen form and stage of growth.Journal of Plant Nutrition 21: 191–198.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, H. & D.W. Burger, 1988. Effects of dissolved oxygen concentration in aero-hydroponics on the formation and growth of adventitious roots.Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 113: 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreugdenhil, D. & P.C. Struik, 1989. An integrated view of the hormonal regulation of tuber formation in potato (Solanum tuberosum).Physiologia Plantarum 75: 525–531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, W.Y., W. Cao & T.W. Tibbitts, 1994. Tuber initiation in hydroponically grown potatoes by alteration of solution pH.Hort Science 29: 621–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R.M., C.L. Mackowiak, J.C. Sager, W.M. Knott & C.R. Hinkle, 1990. Potato growth and yield using nutrient film technique (NFT).American Potato Journal 67: 177–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, S.G., R. Cabello, P. Tovar & J.H. Dodds, 1987. Rapid seed multiplication by planting into beds micro tubers and in vitro plants.Potato Research 30: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritter, E., Angulo, B., Riga, P. et al. Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers. Potato Res 44, 127–135 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410099

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410099

Additional keywords

Navigation