Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous risks and the risk premium

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note tries to correct a deficiency of the microeconomic literature on decision making under uncertainty. Indeed, when considering meaningful comparative statics results in situations where risks are at least partially controllable (endogenous), this literature has mostly relied upon the traditional Arrow-Pratt risk aversion functions and has paid very little attention to the definition of the risk premium. However when they defined the risk premium and the risk aversion functions, Arrow and Pratt considered only roulette gambles, i.e. risks totally exogenous to the individual. This note highlights the fact that several definitions of the risk premium may be proposed for endogenous risks. Two of them, already used in the literature, do not preserve the intuitively-appealing properties of the Arrow-Pratt risk premium. An alternative definition is then proposed. It is shown that this new definition of the risk premium applied to endogenous risks exhibits the properties generally admitted for roulette gambles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.: 1971,Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Markham, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.: 1970, ‘Price Uncertainty, Utility and Industry Equilibrium in Pure Competition’,Int. Econ. Rev. 11, 463–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capéraà, P. and Eeckhoudt, L.: 1975, ‘Delayed Risks and Risk Premiums’,J. Fin. Econ. 2, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D. and Stiglitz, J.: 1972, ‘Risk Aversion and Wealth Effects on Portfolios with Many Assets’,Review of Economic Studies 39, 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. and Modigliani, F.: 1972, ‘Consumption Decisions under Uncertainty’,J. Econ. Theory 5, 308–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’,Econometrica 47, 263–291.

  • Kihlstrom, R. and Mirman, L.: 1974, ‘Risk Aversion with Many Commodities’,J. Econ. Theory 8, 361–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M.: 1979, ‘A Comparative Statics Theorem for Choice under Risk’,J. Econ. Theory 21, 510–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.: 1984, ‘Temporal Risk and the Nature of Induced Preferences’,J. Econ. Theory 33, 199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.: 1964, ‘Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large’,Econometrica 32, 122–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.: 1970, ‘Increasing Risk: A Definition’,J. Econ. Theory 2, 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tressler, J. and Menezes, C.: 1983, ‘Constant Returns to Scale and Competitive Equilibrium under Uncertainty’,J. Econ. Theory 31, 383–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The three authors have benefitted from Ph. Caperaa's advice and from a referee's comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briys, E., Eeckhoudt, L. & Loubergé, H. Endogenous risks and the risk premium. Theor Decis 26, 37–46 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134055

Keywords

Navigation