Abstract
The influence of 8 mineralisation (dry and wet ashings) procedures on the determination of the mineral content of the brown seaweed Undaria pinnatifida by atomic absorption spectrophotometry was studied. Two procedures are proposed for routine analysis: dry ashing using sample calcination at 450 °C, followed by ash treatment with hydrochloric acid and silica elimination by hydrofluoric acid, and wet digestion using hot nitric acid.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Giron, H. C., 1973. Comparison between dry ashing and wet digestion in the preparation of plant material for atomic absorption. Atomic Absorption Newsletter 12: 28–29.
Hoenig, M, P. V. Hoegweghen & J. Liboton, 1979. Evaluation à l'aide d'étalons internationaux de deux méthodes de minéralisation des végétaux. Analusis. 2: 104–106.
Issac, R. A. & W. C. Johnson, 1975. Collaborative study of wet and dry ashing techniques for the elemental analysis of plant tissue by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. ass. offic. analyt. Chem. 3: 436–440.
Pinta, M, 1980. Minéralisation des milieux végétaux. In: Spectrometrie d'absorption atomique; Application à l'analyse chimique. Tome 2. Masson Editeur, Paris: 384–421.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fleurence, J., Le Coeur, C. Influence of mineralisation methods on the determination of the mineral content of the brown seaweed Undaria pinnatifida by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Hydrobiologia 260, 531–534 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049066
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049066