Abstract
Spontaneous laughter may serve as an auditory cue to affiliative intent within social contexts, whereas volitional laughter may connote deceptive, or non-affiliative, social communication. It would thus be advantageous to distinguish between affiliative and deceptive laughter to identify and prefer conspecifics genuinely interested in affiliating, particularly those whose current affiliative needs are unmet. Furthermore, women’s greater capability to discriminate between emotional cues should implicate them as being especially favorable toward spontaneous laughter. Because social exclusion heightens interest in affiliation, social exclusion should heighten favorability toward those communicating spontaneous laughter, which should be especially augmented among women. The current research examined both trait and state factors that might be moderate responses to spontaneous and volitional laughter. We experimentally activated affiliative motives and tasked men and women with indicating their preferences for spontaneous and volitional laughs. Although activation of affiliative needs did not alter preferences for laughter, participants ultimately preferred spontaneous laughs over volitional. Women were especially sensitive to laughter’s affiliative value, reporting greater disinterest in affiliating with targets emitting volitional laughs, a finding consistent with research indicating women’s heightened sensitivity toward affiliative cues and sensitivity to potentially exploitive conspecifics due to sexual dimorphism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachorowski, J. A., & Owren, M. J. (2001). Not all laughs are alike: voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psychological Science, 12, 252–257.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Bernstein, M. J., Sacco, D. F., Brown, C. M., Young, S. G., & Claypool, H. M. (2010). A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 196–199.
Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., Brown, C. M., Sacco, D. F., & Claypool, H. M. (2008). Adaptive responses to social exclusion: social rejection improves detection of real and fake smiles. Psychological Science, 19, 981–983.
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2017). Greater need to belong predicts a stronger preference for extraverted faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 220–223.
Brown, M., Sacco, D. F., Lolley, K. P., & Block, D. (2017). Facing the implications: self-protection motives differentially predict preferences for facially communicated psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 1–5.
Bryant, G. A., & Aktipis, C. A. (2014). The animal nature of spontaneous human laughter. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 327–335.
Bryant, G. A., Fessler, D. M., Fusaroli, R., Clint, E., Aarøe, L., Apicella, C. L., et al. (2016). Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4682–4687.
DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., & Rouby, D. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741.
DiDonato, T. E., Bedminster, M. C., & Machel, J. J. (2013). My funny valentine: how humor styles affect romantic interest. Personal Relationships, 20, 374–390.
Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: a synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 395–430.
Glenn, P., & Holt, E. (2013). Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hall, J. A., & Matsumoto, D. (2004). Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from facial expressions. Emotion, 4, 201–206.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.
Keltner, D., & Bonanno, G. A. (1997). A study of laughter and dissociation: distinct correlates of laughter and smiling during bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 687–702.
Lavan, N., Lima, C. F., Harvey, H., Scott, S. K., & McGettigan, C. (2015). I thought that I heard you laughing: contextual facial expressions modulate the perception of authentic laughter and crying. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 935–944.
Lavan, N., & McGettigan, C. (2017). Increased discriminability of authenticity from multimodal laughter is driven by auditory information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 2159–2168.
Lavan, N., Scott, S. K., & McGettigan, C. (2016). Laugh like you mean it: authenticity modulates acoustic, physiological and perceptual properties of laughter. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 133–149.
Ludlow, C. L. (2013). Motor control and biomechanics of laryngeal and pharyngeal muscles. In L. K. McLoon & F. H. Andrade (Eds.), Craniofacial muscles: a new framework for understanding the effector side of craniofacial muscle control (pp. 167–183). New York: Springer.
Lustgraaf, C. N. J., Sacco, D. F., & Young, S. G. (2015). Smiling and social perception: evolutionary, neuroscientific, and social cognitive considerations. In A. Freitas-Magalhaes (Ed.), Emotional expression: The brain and the face (Vol. 7, pp. 115–147).
Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55.
McKeown, G., Sneddon, I., & Curran, W. (2015). Gender differences in the perceptions of genuine and simulated laughter and amused facial expressions. Emotion Review, 7, 30–38.
Mehu, M., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour, 145, 1747–1780.
Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2014). A two-dimensional model for the study of interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 59–86.
Murray, D. R., Murphy, S. C., von Hippel, W., Trivers, R., & Haselton, M. G. (2017). A preregistered study of competing predictions suggests that men do overestimate women’s sexual intent. Psychological Science, 28, 253–255.
Neuhoff, C. C., & Schaefer, C. (2002). Effects of laughing, smiling, and howling on mood. Psychological Reports, 91, 1079–1080.
Overeem, S., Lammers, G. J., & Van Dijk, J. G. (1999). Weak with laughter. The Lancet, 354, 838.
Owren, M. J., & Bachorowski, J.-A. (2003). Reconsidering the evolution of nonlinguistic communication: the case of laughter. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 183–200.
Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: the need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107.
Provine, R. R. (2004). Laughing, tickling, and the evolution of speech and self. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 215–218.
Sacco, D. F., Brown, M., Lustgraaf, C. J., & Young, S. G. (2017). Women’s dangerous world beliefs predict more accurate discrimination of affiliative facial cues. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11, 309–315.
Sacco, D. F., Brown, M., May, H. D., & Medlin, M. (2017). Making of an in-joke: humor appreciation as an ingratiation strategy following ostracism. Evolutionary Psychological Science.
Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 575–584.
Sell, A., Hone, L. S., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23, 30–44.
Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.
Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Besser, A., & Jett, S. E. (2013). Laughing at the looking glass: does humor style serve as an interpersonal signal? Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 201–226.
Acknowledgements
We thank Katie Ramsey and Haley May for their assistance in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, M., Sacco, D.F. & Young, S.G. Spontaneous Laughter as an Auditory Analog to Affiliative Intent. Evolutionary Psychological Science 4, 285–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0135-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0135-3