Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Organizational Learning and Absorptive Capacity on the Abnormal Returns of Acquirers: Evidence from Cross-Border Acquisitions by Indian Companies

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intent of the research paper has been to evaluate the short-term performance in terms of abnormal returns to the announcement of cross-border acquisitions (CBAs). This research work is based on 139 acquisitions undertaken by Indian companies during 2012–2016. The event study methodology has been applied to assess the effect of acquisition announcement on the short-run performance of the bidding firm. Later on, adopting the conceptual framework of organizational learning and absorptive capacity of the organization, a disaggregative analysis has been conducted to ascertain the factors affecting short-run performance. The results indicate that on an average, CBAs have statistically significant and positive valuation effects for the Indian bidders in the short-run. Further, a disaggregative analysis shows that previous CBA experience and horizontal acquisitions have positive and significant valuation effects for the acquirers. Similarly, the age of the acquirer has been observed to exert a favorable influence on its own valuation post-acquisition. However, smaller firms vis-a-vis mid- and large-sized firms generate more abnormal returns. The paper attempts to extend the application of organizational learning theory and absorptive capacity to the field of corporate mergers and acquisitions by analyzing the equity market response to the public announcement of cross-border acquisitions and antecedents of such response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akben-Selcuk, E. (2016). Does firm age affect profitability? Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 5(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, J., & Delios, A. (2002). Absolute and relative resources as determinants of international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aureli, S. (2015). Performance of unlisted Italian companies acquired by multinationals from emerging markets: The case of Indian acquisitions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(5), 895–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aw, M., & Chatterjee, R. (2004). The performance of UK firms acquiring large cross-border and domestic takeover targets. Applied Financial Economics, 14(5), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000211605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aybar, B., & Ficici, A. (2009). Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: An analysis of emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1317–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, H. (1992). The emerging flexible organization: Perspectives from silicon valley. California Management Review, 34(4), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, O., & Zitouna, H. (2008). Domestic versus cross-border acquisitions: which impact on the target firms’ performance? Applied Economics, 40(17), 2221–2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beule, F. D., & Sels, A. (2016). Do innovative emerging market cross-border acquirers create more shareholder value? Evidence from India. International Business Review, 25(2), 604–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., Malhotra, S., & Zhu, P. (2011). Emerging country cross-border acquisitions: Characteristics. Emerging Markets Review, 12(3), 250–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishwas, S. K. (2015). Achieving organization vitality through innovation and flexibility: An empirical study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishwas, S. K., & Sushil, (2016). LIFE: An integrated view of meta organizational process for vitality. Journal of Management Development, 35(6), 747–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, R. F., Conroy, R. M., Estrada, J., Kritzman, M., & Li, W. (2002). Introduction to ‘valuation in emerging markets’. Emerging Markets Review, 3(4), 310–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. (2004). The challenges of the new economy for multinational firms: The future of foreign investment in Southeast Asia. London: Curzon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cakici, N., Hessel, C., & Tandon, K. (1996). Foreign acquisitions in the United States: Effect on shareholder wealth of foreign acquiring firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(2), 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. (2010). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, R. L., Cosh, A., Guest, P. M., & Hughes, A. (2005). The impact on UK acquirers of domestic, cross-border, public and private acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5–6), 815–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danbolt, J., & Maciver, G. (2012). Cross-border versus domestic acquisitions and the impact on shareholder wealth. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(7–8), 1028–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., & Puia, G. (1995). Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in US acquiring firms. MIR. Management International Review, 35(4), 337–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., & Sushil. (2017). Flexibility in modification and termination of cross-border joint ventures. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & Witteloostuij, A. V. (2010). Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: The effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981–2001. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, P., & Ruback, R. (1977). Tender offers and stockholder returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(3), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukas, J., & Travlos, N. G. (1988). The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth: Evidence from international acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1161–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, M., & Boateng, A. (2014). State ownership, institutional effects and value creation in cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms. International Business Review, 24(3), 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, M., & Boateng, A. (2015). State ownership, institutional effects and value creation in cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms. International Business Review, 24(3), 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duppati, G. R., & Rao, N. V. (2015). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Mature. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1088817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., Samir, S., & Zhu, P. (2013). Does payment method matter in cross-border acquisitions? International Review of Economics and Finance, 25, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckbo, B. E., & Thorburn, K. S. (2000). Gains to bidder firms revisited: Domestic and foreign acquisitions in Canada. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1976). Foundations of finance. New York: Basic Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goergen, M., & Renneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of european domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European Financial Management, 10(1), 9–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M., & Chittoor, R. (2010). Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Harrison, J., Ireland, R. D., & Best, A. (1998). Attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisitions of US firms. British Journal of Management, 9(2), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., & Pisano, V. (2003). The cross-border merger and acquisition strategy: A research perspective. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(2), 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Kashiramka, S., & Jain, P. K. (2017). Market response to corporate restructuring strategies. In Proceedings of international conference on strategies in volatile and uncertain environment for emerging markets, (pp. 709–716). New Delhi.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashiramka, S., & Rao, N. M. (2014). Shareholders’ wealth effects of mergers and acquisitions on acquiring firms in the Indian IT and ITeS sector. South Asian Journal of Management, 21(3), 140–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at hyundai motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R., & Mann, B. J. (2012). Analyzing determinants of value creation in domestic and cross border acquisitions in India. International Business Review, 21(6), 998–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Li, P., & Wang, B. (2016). Do cross-border acquisitions create value? Evidence from overseas acquisitions by Chinese firms. International Business Review, 25(2), 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowinski, F., Schiereck, D., & Thomas, T. W. (2004). The effect of cross-border acquisitions on shareholder wealth: Evidence from Switzerland. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 22(4), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Zhu, Y., & Cai, W. (2016). The performance of cross-border acquirers from emerging economies: An empirical analysis of Chinese firms. Nankai Business Review International, 7(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-12-2014-0046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinlay, A. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C., & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: evidence from US International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 626–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, A., & Jain, P. (2012). Mergers and acquisitions performance system: Integrated framework for strategy formulation and execution using flexible strategy game-card. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, S. B., & Schlingemann, F. P. (2005). Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(3), 533–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P., & Thenmozhi, M. (2014). Do cross-border acquisitions involving emerging market firms create. Management Decision, 52(8), 1451–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan, M., Pervan, I., & Ćurak, M. (2017). The influence of age on firm performance: Evidence from the croatian food industry. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 2017, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. NY: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2004). The determinants of outward foreign direct investment: A firm-level analysis of Indian manufacturing. Oxford Development Studies, 32(4), 619–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, K. F., Ahmad, N., Ahmad, I., & Rahim, F. A. (2013). Determinants of cross border merger and acquisition in advanced emerging market acquiring firms. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, N., & Asija, A. (2017). Signaling power of corporate name change: A case of Indian firms. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, N., Yadav, S. S., & Jain, P. K. (2012). The impact of domestic mergers and acquisitions on acquirer shareholders’ wealth in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(4), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, N., Yadav, S. S., & Jain, P. K. (2015). Market response to internationalization. IIMB Management Review, 27(2), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and Growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth, A. (1990). Sources of value creation in acquisitions: an empirical investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1989). Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. Handbook of organizations (Vol. 7).

  • Sushil, (2012). Multiple perspectives of flexible systems management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2017a). Does flexibility mitigate or enhance risk? Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2017b). Small steps for a giant leap: Flexible organization. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0163-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, F., Liu, X., Gao, L., & Xia, E. (2016). Do cross-border mergers and acquisitions increase short-term market performance? The case of Chinese firms. International Business Review, 26(1), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M., & Boateng, A. (2009). An analysis of short-run performance of cross-border mergers. Review of Accounting and Finance, 8(4), 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varaiya, N. P. (1988). The ‘Winners’s curse’ hypothesis and corporate takeovers. Managerial and Decision Economics, 9(3), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. G. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanfar, D. (2013). Profitability determinants among micro firms: evidence from Swedish data. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 9(2), 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, IV Floor, Vishwakarma Bhawan, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Samta Jain, Smita Kashiramka & P. K. Jain

Authors
  1. Samta Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Smita Kashiramka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. K. Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samta Jain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in the present study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, S., Kashiramka, S. & Jain, P.K. Impact of Organizational Learning and Absorptive Capacity on the Abnormal Returns of Acquirers: Evidence from Cross-Border Acquisitions by Indian Companies. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 19, 289–303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0193-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0193-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation