Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial Mapping of Agricultural Water Productivity Using the SWAT Model

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sina river basin is facing both episodic and chronic water shortages due to intensive irrigation development. The main objective of this study was to characterize the hydrologic processes of the Sina river basin and assess crop water productivity using the distributed hydrologic model, SWAT. In the simulation year (1998–1999), the inflow to reservoir from upstream side was the major contributor to the reservoir accounting for 92 % of the total required water release for irrigation purpose (119.5 Mm3), while precipitation accounted for 4.1 Mm3. Annual release of water for irrigation was 119.5 Mm3 out of which 54 % water was diverted for irrigation purpose, 26 % was wasted as conveyance loss, average discharge at the command outlet was estimated as 4 % and annual average ground-water recharge coefficient was in the range of 13–17 %. Various scenarios involving water allocation rule were tested with the goal of increasing economic water productivity values in the Sina Irrigation Scheme. Out of those, only most benefited allocation rule is analyzed in this paper. Crop yield varied from 1.98 to 25.9 t/ha, with the majority of the area between 2.14 and 2.78 t/ha. Yield and WP declined significantly in loamy soils of the irrigation command. Crop productivity in the basin was found in the lower range when compared with potential and global values. The findings suggested that there was a potential to improve further. Spatial variations in yield and WP were found to be very high for the crops grown during rabi season, while those were low for the crops grown during kharif season. The crop yields and WP during kharif season were more in the lower reach of the irrigation commands, where loamy soil is more concentrated. Sorghum in both seasons was most profitable. Sorghum fetched net income fivefold that of sunflower, two and half fold of pearl millet and one and half fold of mung beans as far as crop during kharif season were concerned and it fetched fourfold that of groundnut, threefold of wheat, twofold of onion during rabi season and was sevenfold of sugarcane. Analysis suggests that maximization of the area by provision of supplemental irrigation to rainfed areas as well as better on-farm water management practices can provide opportunities for improving water productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Gaur, S. Acharya, H. Turral, P.G. McCornick, Implications of drought and water regulation in the Krishna basin, India. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 23(4), 583–589 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.W. Kijne, R. Barker, D. Molden, Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement (CAB International, Wallingford, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.A.M. Bouman, A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales. Agric. Syst. 93, 43–60 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Molden, Accounting for water use and productivity. In SWIM Paper 1. IIMI, Colombo (1997)

  5. D. Molden, R. Sakthivadivel, Water accounting to assess use and productivity of water. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 15(1 and 2), 55–71 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Loeve, B. Dong, D. Molden, Y.H. Li, C.D. Chen, J.Z. Wang, Issues of scale in water productivity in the Zhanghe irrigation system: implications for irrigation in the basin context. Paddy Water Environ. 2(4), 227–236 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.C. Refsgaard, B. Storm, MIKE SHE, in Computer models of watershed hydrology, ed. by V.P. Singh (Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, 1995), pp. 809–846

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Im, H. Kim, C. Kim, C. Jang, Assessing the impacts of land use changes on watershed hydrology using MIKE SHE. Environ. Geol. 57, 231–239 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K.J. Beven, M.J. Kirkby, A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24(1), 43–69 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Vincendon, V. Ducrocq, G.M. Saulnier, L. Bouilloud, K. Chancibault, F. Habets, J. Noilhan, Benefit of coupling the ISBA land surface nodel with a TOPMODEL hydrological model version dedicated to Mediterranean flash-flood. J. Hydrol. 394(1–2), 256–266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.G. Arnold, P. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, J.R. Williams, Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I. Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34, 73–89 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Srinivasan, T.S. Ramanarayanan, J.G. Arnold, S.T. Bednarz, Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part II: model application. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34, 91–101 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Ndomba, F. Mtalo, Killingtveit., SWAT model application in a data scarce tropical complex catchment in Tanzania. Phys. Chem. Earth 33(8–13), 626–632 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Stehr, P. Debels, F. Romero, H. Alcayaga, Hydrological modeling with SWAT under conditions of limited data availability: evaluation of results from a Chilean case study. Hydrol. Sci. J. 53(3), 588–601 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Dhar, A. Mazumdar, Hydrological modeling of Kangsabati River under changed climate scenario: case study in India. Hydrol. Proc. 23(16), 2394–2406 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.K. Gosain, S. Rao, D. Basuray, Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian river basins. Curr. Sci. 90(3), 346–353 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. W.W. Immerzeel, P. Droogers, Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol. 349(3–4), 411–424 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W.W. Immerzeel, A. Gaur, S.J. Zwart, Integrating remote sensing and a process-based hydrological model to evaluate water use and productivity in a south Indian catchment. Agric. Water Manag. 95(1), 11–24 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M.S. Kang, S.W. Park, J.J. Lee, K.H. Yoo, Applying SWAT for TMDL programs to a small watershed containing rice paddy fields. Agric. Water Manag. 79, 72–92 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.H. Green, A.V. Griensven, Auto-calibration in hydrologic modeling: using SWAT2005 in small-scale watersheds. Environ. Model Softw. 23, 422–434 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Luo, C. He, M. Sophocleous, Z. Yin, R. Hongrui, Z. Ouyang, Assessment of crop growth and soil water modules in SWAT2000 using extensive field experiment data in an irrigation district of the Yellow River Basin. J. Hydrol. 352, 139–156 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Schuol, K.C. Abbaspour, R. Srinivasan, H. Yang, Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model. J. Hydrol. 352, 30–49 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W.W. Immerzeel, P. Droogers Calibrating SWAT using satellite evapotranspiration in the Upper Bhima catchment, India. 4th International Conference, Institute for Water Education, Delft, 4–6 July, 2007, pp. 385–397

  24. W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, M. Menenti, R.A. Feddes, A.A.M. Holtslag, The Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL): part 1 formulation. J. Hydrol. 212–213, 198–212 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, H. Pelgrum, J. Wang, Y. Ma, J. Moreno, G.J. Roerink, T. van der Wal, The Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL): part 2 validation. J. Hydrol. 212–213, 213–229 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, E.J.M. Noordman, H. Pelgrum, G. Davids, R.G. Allen, SEBAL for spatially distributed ET under actual management and growing conditions. ASCE J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 131(1), 85–93 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anonymous. Second Revised Project Report of Sina Medium Irrigation Project. Vol. I. Report of Irrigation Department, Ahmednagar Irrigation Circle, Government of Maharashtra—1996–1997, 1997

  28. P.W. Gassman, M.R. Reyes, C.H. Green, J.G. Arnold, The Soil and water assessment tool: historical development, application and future research directions. Trans. ASABE 50(4), 1211–1250 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J.R. Williams, J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, P.W. Gassman, C.H. Green, History of model development at Temple, Texas. Hydrol. Sci. J 53(5), 948–960 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O. Challa, K.S. Gajbhiye, M. Velayutham, Soil Series of Maharashtra. NBSS Publication No. 79. National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (BSS&LUP) Nagpur, 1999, pp. 428

  31. A.B. Mandavia, Modernization of irrigation system operational management by way of canal automation in India. Modernization of irrigation system operations: Proceedings of 5th IT IS Network International Meeting, Aurangabad, 1998

  32. S.D. Gorantiwar, A model for planning and operation of heterogeneous irrigation schemes in semi-arid regions under rotational water supply. Ph.D. thesis. Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire, 1995

  33. A.K. Gosain, S. Rao, R. Srinivasan, N.G. Reddy, Return-flow assessment for irrigation command in the Palleru River basin using SWAT model. Hydrol. Proc. 19(3), 673–682 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J.E. Nash, J.V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models, 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282–290 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D.N. Moriasi, J.G. Arnold, M.W. Van Liew, R.L. Bingner, R.D. Harmel, T.L. Veith, Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50(3), 885–900 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S.D. Gorantiwar, I.K. Smout, Water resources management of irrigation schemes in semi-arid and arid regions. Proceedings of Regional Conference on Water Resources Management, Isfahan, 1995

  37. T.P. Tuong, B.A.M. Bouman, Rice productivity in water-scarce environments, in Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement, The Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series, vol. 1, ed. by J.W. Kijne, R. Barker, D. Molden (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 2003), pp. 1–342

    Google Scholar 

  38. S.D. Gorantiwar, R.T. Thokal, M. Kothari, S.R. Bhakar and R.C. Purohit, Application of GIS-based SWAT tool water management of irrigation project under rotational water supply. Paper presented in SWAT international conference held at New Delhi, 2012

  39. F.H.S. Chiew, M.C. Peel, A.W. Western, Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD, in Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, ed. by V.P. Singh, D.K. Frevert (Water Resources Publications, Littleton, 2002), pp. 335–367

    Google Scholar 

  40. R.T. Thokal, Spatial Decision Support System for Allocation of Limited Water Under Rotational Water Supply using SWAT Model. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis to be submitted to MPUAT, Udaipur, 2012

  41. M.C. Klaij, G. Vachaud, Seasonal water balance of a sandy soil in Niger cropped with pearl millet, based on profile moisture measurements. Agric. Water Manag. 21, 313–330 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. J. Rockstrom, Biomass production in dry tropical zones: how to increase water productivity. Land and Water Integration and River Basin Management. FAO Land and Water Bulletin, 1995, pp. 31–47

  43. J. Mu, S. Khan, M.A. Hanjra, H. Wang, A food security approach to analyze irrigation efficiency improvement demands at the country level. Irrig. Drain. 58(1), 1–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. H.S. Mishra, T.R. Rathore, V.S. Tomar, Water use efficiency of irrigated wheat in the Tarai region of India. Irrig. Sci. 16, 75–80 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. P.K. Bandyopadhyay, S. Mallick, Actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under varying moisture levels of humid tropical canal command area. Agric. Water Manag. 59, 33–47 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. K.S. Sharma, J.S. Samra, H.P. Singh, Influence of boundary plantation of poplar (Populus deltoides M.) on soil-water use and water use efficiency of wheat. Agric. Water Manag. 51, 173–185 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. K.D. Sharma, A. Kumar, K.N. Singh, Effect of irrigation scheduling on growth, yield and evapotranspiration of wheat in sodic soils. Agric. Water Manag. 18, 267–276 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. P.K. Aggarwal, R.P. Roeter, N. Kalra, H. Van Keulen, C.T. Hoanh and H.H. Van Laar (eds.), Land use Analysis and Planning for Sustainable Food Security: With an Illustration for the State of Haryana, India. Indian Research Institute: New Delhi; International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños; Wageningen University and Research Center: Wageningen, 2001, pp. 1–167

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Tulshiram Thokal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thokal, R.T., Gorantiwar, S.D., Kothari, M. et al. Spatial Mapping of Agricultural Water Productivity Using the SWAT Model. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 96, 85–98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-015-0113-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-015-0113-3

Keywords

Navigation