Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for chloroprene rubber

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neo-Hookean model and Mooney-Rivlin model are hyperelastic material models where the strain energy density function is made from invariants of the left Cauchy-Green deformation tensor. Even though Ogden model is a hyperelastic material model, its strain energy density function is expressed by principal stretch ratio. These three models have been widely used in industries. Recently, Ogden model, especially Ogden 3rd model, shows better agreement with the test data than others. In spite of the limitations to describe particular stress states, it is known that reasonable results using these models can be obtained for various structural components. In this research, three kinds of models are considered for Chloroprene rubber. Three kinds of tests (Uniaxial tension test, Biaxial tension test, and Planar shear test) are performed for Chloroprene specimen and through four kinds of test combinations (Uni+Bi, Uni+Pl, Bi+Pl, Uni+Bi+Pl), numerical simulations are carried out for Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model. It is shown that Mooney-Rivlin model and Ogden model can be used for Chloroprene Rubber in the specific ranges for Isotropic Hyperelastic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woo, C. S., Park, H. S., Kim, Y. G., Shin, W. G. and Joe, D. H., “Finite Element Analysis and Evaluation of Automotive Rubber Components,” Proceedings of the KSAE, pp. 951–955, 2010.

  2. Mooney, M., “A Theory of Large Elastic Deformation,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 582–591, 1940.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jang, W. J., Lee, J., Woo, C. S., Kim, B. K. and Lee, S. B., “An Experimental Study and Finite Element Analysis of Weatherstrip,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 97–104, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boulanger, P. and Hayes, M., “Finite Amplitude Waves in Mooney-Rivlin and Hadamard Materials, in Topics in Finite Elasticity,” International Center for Mechanical Sciences, 2001.

  5. Selvadurai, A. P. S., “Deflections of a Rubber Membrane,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1093–1119, 2006.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Menderes, H. and Konter, A. W. A., “Advanced FE Analysis of Elastomeric Automobile Components under Realistic Loading Conditions,” Proceedings of the First European Conference on Constitutive Models for Rubber, pp. 3–12, 1999.

  7. Ogden, R. W., “Non-Linear Elastic Deformations,” Dover, 1998.

  8. Rivlin, R. S., “Large Elastic Deformations Isotropic Materials. IV. Further Developments of the General Theory,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Vol. 241, No. 835, pp. 379–397, 1948.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogden, R. W., “Large Deformation Isotropic Elasticity — On the Correlation of Theory and Experiment for Incompressible Rubberlike Solids,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Vol. 326, No. 1567, pp. 565–584, 1972.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. MSC Software Co., “Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers,” 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, High Safety Vehicle Core Technology Research Center, Inje University, Eobang-dong, Gimhae, South Korea, 621-749

    Beomkeun Kim & Seong Beom Lee

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inje University, Eobang-dong, Gimhae, South Korea, 621-749

    Jayone Lee, Sehyun Cho, Hyungmin Park & Sanghoon Yeom

  3. Agency for Defense Development, 111 Sunam-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea, 305-152

    Sung Han Park

Authors
  1. Beomkeun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seong Beom Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jayone Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sehyun Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hyungmin Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sanghoon Yeom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sung Han Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Beom Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, B., Lee, S.B., Lee, J. et al. A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for chloroprene rubber. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13, 759–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation