Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

College as Context: Influences on Interpersonal Sexual Scripts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scripting theory (Gagnon and Simon in Sexual conduct: the social sources of human sexuality, Aldine, Chicago, 1973; Simon and Gagnon in Arch Sex Behav 13:97–120, 1986; Qual Sociol 26:491–497, 2003) is used to examine the impact of religion, gender, social class, and race as well as the college social environment on sexual interaction. Research has investigated how social networks and contexts shape sexual scripts. College campuses are important contexts for sexuality, locating students within peer networks and, given the emergence of a hookup culture, presenting them with multiple options for sexual behavior. Survey data collected from 614 students on two campuses revealed that many types of hooking up and sexual relationships are common. These intimate interactions are conceptualized as interpersonal scripts and classified as relational, recreational, or a combination of those scripts. Findings suggest that hooking up varies by gender, race, alcohol consumption, and perceptions of the hooking up behavior of close friends, but not by social class, Greek affiliation, religiosity, religious attendance, or perceptions of campus norms. Relationships vary only by perceptions of close friends’ participation in relationships. The implications of college as a social context for sexual scripts are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanesi, H. (2010). Gender and sexual agency: How young people make choices about sex. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequence: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, J. E., Kaestle, C. E., & Allen, K. A. (2010). Dating is hard work: A narrative approach to understanding sexual and romantic relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 32, 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barriger, M., & Vélez-Blasini, C. J. (2013). Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli, A. M., & Clark, M. D. (2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality and Culture, 10, 54–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersamin, M. M., Paschall, M. J., Saltz, R. F., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2012). Young adults and casual sex: The relevance of college drinking settings. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. P. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, A. A., & Spade, J. Z. (2000). Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women. In M. Hutter (Ed.), The family experience: A reader in cultural diversity (pp. 89–100). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Hill, T. D., & Glenn, N. (2009). ‘Hooking up’ at college: Does religion make a difference? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, S. C., & Gunther, A. C. (2006). How media contribute to misperceptions of social norms about sex. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, K. J., & Thomas, L. R. (1991). The influence of observed alcohol consumption on perceptions of initiation of sexual activity in a college dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. K, Sr, Moore, N. B., Earle, J. R., & Davis, R. (2008). Sexual attitudes and behavior at four universities: Do region, race, and/or religion matter? Adolescence, 43, 189–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L. (2001). A comment on interpreting odds-ratios when logistic regression coefficients are negative. AIR Professional File, 81, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing-Matibag, T. M., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson, S., Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Mahay, J. (2004). The theory of sex markets. In E. O. Laumann, S. Ellingson, J. Mahay, A. Paik, & Y. Youm (Eds.), The sexual organization of the city (pp. 3–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2007). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader (pp. 531–547). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. D. (2007). Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. D., Moore, Z. T., & Pittenger, M. J. (2012). Sex on the brain? An examination of frequency of sexual cognitions as a function of gender, erotophila, and social desirability. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, D. (2008). Sex and the soul: Juggling sexuality, spirituality, romance, and religion on America’s college campuses. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazian, D. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban night life and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, L. K., & Mongeau, P. A. (2008). On becoming ‘more than friends’: The transition from friendship to romantic relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 175–194). New York: Tyler & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heldman, C., & Wade, L. (2010). Hook-up culture: Setting a new research agenda. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2011). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communication, 1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, D., Biely, E., Eyal, K., Cope-Farrar, K., Donnerstein, E. F., & Fandrich, R. (2003). Sex on TV 3: Content and context. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). Social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahay, J., Laumann, E. O., & Michaels, S. (2001). Race, gender, and class in sexual scripts. In E. O. Laumann & R. T. Michaels (Eds.), Sex, love, and health in America: Private choices and public policies (pp. 197–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, G. (2008). “Can women have sex like a man?” Sexual scripts in Sex and the City. Sexuality and Culture, 12, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y., & Hummer, R. A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender & Society, 3, 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeau, P. A., Knight, K., Williams, J., Eden, J., & Shaw, C. (2011). Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, dio,. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.623797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on ‘friends with benefits’ relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. J., Rhodes, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). ’Hooking up’ among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual sex’: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, K. A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penhollow, T., Young, M., & Bailey, W. (2007). Relationship between religiosity and “hooking up” behavior. American Journal of Health Education, 38, 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1992). Designing and understanding survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., Gibson-Beverly, G., & Schwartz, J. P. (2004). Sorority and fraternity membership and religious behaviors: Relation to gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 50, 871–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, S. (2010). Grinding on the dance floor: Gendered scripts and sexualized dancing at college parties. Gender and Society, 24, 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Sheldon, L. A., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2008). Health behavior and college students: Does Greek affiliation matter? Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, R. D. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing the sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24, 98–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weschler, H., Dowdall, G. W., Davenport, A., & Castillo, S. (1995). Correlates of college student binge drinking. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 921–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. Family Journal, 13, 496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2009). The impact of living in co-ed resident halls on risk-taking among college students. Journal of American College Health, 58, 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Roanoke College, 221 College Lane, Salem, VA, 24153, USA

    Marit Ann Berntson & Kristi L. Hoffman

  2. Division of Social Sciences, Concord University, Athens, WV, USA

    Tracy L. Luff

Authors
  1. Marit Ann Berntson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristi L. Hoffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tracy L. Luff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marit Ann Berntson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berntson, M.A., Hoffman, K.L. & Luff, T.L. College as Context: Influences on Interpersonal Sexual Scripts. Sexuality & Culture 18, 149–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation