Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“Coming Clean” on Duty of Care: Australian Print Media’s Representation of Male Versus Female Sex Offenders in Institutional Contexts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public opinion about sexual abuse of minors is greatly shaped by mass media and the way individual cases are reported. This paper examines Australian print media’s representation of sex offenders, focussing particularly on the sex of the offenders and aiming to shed light on some of the misconceptions and deep-rooted prejudices within the population at large. Given the multi-faceted nature of sexual offences, this paper focuses on sexual offences committed by both males and females against minors in the context of a companion breach of duty of care. In order to explore the effect that linguistic tools can have in the Australian print media’s way of reporting sexual abuse cases, twenty-nine newspaper articles published in Australian dailies were selected for analysis. The analysis of these articles reveals a marked bias in the manner in which sexual offences perpetrated by males, as opposed to females, are reported, suggesting a male monopoly on sexual abuse. We argue that this biased representation, which hinders adequate profiling of sexual offences against minors, may stem from an androcentric view of sexuality and from the systematic denial of female agency when it comes to sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, C. M. (1990). Women as perpetrators of child sexual abuse: Recognition barriers. In A. L. Horton, B. L. Johnson, L. M. Roundy, & D. Williams (Eds.), The incest perpetrator: A family member no one wants to treat (pp. 108–125). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, I., & Swainson, V. (2001). Perceived motivation for rape: Gender differences in beliefs about female and male rape. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6(8), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16, 645–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, D. M., & Compton, S. V. (1997). Patterns of sexual coercion in adult heterosexual relationships: An exploration of male victimization. Family Process, 36(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood, D. (1987). The male rape victim. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 21(5), 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in ‘offender profiling’. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 1(2), 185–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, S. L. (2004). Upsetting desires in the classroom: School sex scandals and the pedagogy of the femme fatale. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 9, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (1989). The linguistics of blame: Representation of women in the Sun’s reporting of crimes of sexual violence. In D. Cameron (Ed.), The feminist critique of language: A reader (pp. 183–197). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxell, A. W., & King, M. B. (2002). Gender, sexual orientation and sexual assault. In J. Petrak (Ed.), The trauma of sexual assault: Treatment, prevention, and practice (pp. 45–68). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCorse, C. J. B., & Vogtle, S. P. (1997). In a complex voice: The contradictions of male elementary teachers’ career choice and professional identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denov, M. S. (2001). A culture of denial: Exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denov, M. S. (2003a). The myth of innocence: Sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denov, M. S. (2003b). To a safer place? Victims of sexual abuse by females and their disclosures to professionals. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denov, M. S. (2004). Perspectives on female sex offending: A culture of denial. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedoroff, J. P., & Moran, B. (1997). Myths and misconceptions about sex offenders. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6(4), 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., & Russell, D. (1984). Women as perpetrators. In D. Finkelhor (Ed.), Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 578–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (Eds.). (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge.

  • Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Rethinking educational boundaries. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

  • Goddard, C. (1999). Read all about it: The news about child abuse. Child Abuse Review, 5(5), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, C., & Saunders, B. (2000). The gender neglect and textual abuse of children in the print media. Child Abuse Review, 9, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1989). Gender voices. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.

  • Greer, C. (2003). Sex crime and the media: Sex offending and the press in a divided society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, N., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Male rape: Offenders and victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 806–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H. (1994). The sexual metaphor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. (1981). Father-daughter incest. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A. (1984). The “normal” victim: The effects of gender stereotypes on reactions to victims. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(3), 270–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. M. (2006). Females who sexually abuse in organisations working with children. Characteristics, International and Australian prevelance rates: Implications for child protection. Melbourne: Child Wise.

  • Itzin, C. (Ed.). (2000). Home truths about child sexual abuse: A reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. R. (2009). What can he want?: Male teachers, young children, and teaching desire. In W. Martino, M. Kehler, & M. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), The problem with boys’ education: Beyond the backlash (pp. 242–261). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (2002). The ultimate neighbour from hell? Stranger danger and the media framing of paedophiles. In Y. Jewkes & G. Letherby (Eds.), Criminology: A reader. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landor, R. V. (2009). Double standards? Representation of male versus female sex offenders in the Australian media. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, S. A. (2004). Clinical aspects of sexual harassment and gender discrimination: Psychological consequences and treatment interventions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathis, J. L. (1972). Clear thinking about sexual deviation. Chicago: Nelson Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, S. (1996). The impact of news media on child abuse reporting. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20(4), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., Hirschman, R., & Nagayama-Hall, G. C. (1999). Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure and trauma in male rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1998). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. F. (1989). Men sexually assaulted as adults and sexually abused as boys. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 18(3), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E. D. (1994). Females who sexually abuse children: A discussion of gender stereotypes and symbolic assailants. Qualitative Sociology, 17(1), 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G. (Ed.). (1999). Bless me father for i have sinned: Perspectives on sexual abuse committed by Roman catholic priests. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1981). Paedophilia: Constructing a sociological baseline. In M. Cook & K. Howells (Eds.), Adult sexual interest in children (pp. 221–250). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L. J., Soh-Chiew Ee, J., & Aronson, H. (1994). Effects of victim gender and physical versus psychological trauma/injury on observers’ perceptions of sexual assault and its aftereffects. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 30(11/12), 793–808.

  • Sgroi, S. M., & Sargent, M. (1993). Impact and treatment issues for victims of childhood sexual abuse by female perpetrators. In M. Elliott (Ed.), Female sexual abuse of children: The ultimate taboo. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, S. W., & Wortley, R. K. (2001). Child sexual abuse: Offender characteristics and modus operandi. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra (Document # 193).

  • Smith, R., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, D.C.: report commissioned by U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

  • Stanley, J. P., & Robbins, S. W. (1978). Sex-marked predicates in English. Papers in Linguistics, 11, 487–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnston, C. (1998). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnston, C., & Struckman-Johnston, D. (1994). Men’s reactions to hypothetical female sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 31(7/8), 387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2001). Lifestyle factors associated with the sexual assault of men: A routine activity theory analysis. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(2), 153–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11, 7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaux, A. (1993). Paradigmatic assumptions in sexual harassment research: Being guided without being misled. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 42(1), 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vizard, E., Monck, E., & Misch, P. (1995). Child and adolescent sex abuse perpetrators: A review of the research literature. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(5), 731–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, B., & Bentovim, A. (1992). The sexual abuse of male children and adolescents: A review of current research. Journal of Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry, 33(10), 197–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2011). Male preservice teachers and discouragement from teaching. Journal of Men’s Studies, 19(2), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Welsh, S. (1999). Gender and sexual harassment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (1997). Sexual harassment in organizations: A critique of current research and policy. Sexuality and Culture, 1, 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A., Jaffe, P. G., Jetté, J. L., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). The impact of child abuse in community institutions and organizations: Advancing professional and scientific understanding. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Professor Pat Diamond for his feedback on the manuscript, the Editor-in-Chief Professor Roberto Refinetti, and the three anonymous reviewers for raising issues and for their useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Languages and Linguistics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Roland V. Landor & Susana A. Eisenchlas

Authors
  1. Roland V. Landor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susana A. Eisenchlas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana A. Eisenchlas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landor, R.V., Eisenchlas, S.A. “Coming Clean” on Duty of Care: Australian Print Media’s Representation of Male Versus Female Sex Offenders in Institutional Contexts. Sexuality & Culture 16, 486–502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9134-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9134-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation