Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gustatory, Olfactory and Trigeminal Interactions in a Model Carbonated Beverage

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Flavour results from the integration of aroma, taste and chemosensory information within the brain. Understanding interactions between the anatomically separate systems which relay this information is crucial to our appreciation of how different aspects of food contribute to flavour perception and the formulation of successful products. To examine these interactions, a beverage system was created containing elements capable of stimulating gustatory, olfactory and trigeminal systems. Using ingredients relevant to commercial beverages, water, aroma volatiles, tastants and carbonation, enabled examination of the effects of tastant–aroma–carbonation interactions on sensory perception. Samples, selected according to D-optimal designs, were evaluated by a trained panel. Predictive polynomial models were generated from mean panel data to explain variations in the attributes as a function of design factors. Increasing both sugars and acids resulted in increases in perceived flavour. Evidence of differential flavour enhancement profiles of two sugars at perceptually equi-sweet levels, glucose and fructose, supported previous findings in a non-carbonated system (Hewson et al., Food Qual Prefer 19:323–334, 2008). This difference was also evident in models generated for some mouthfeel attributes (tingling and irritant attributes). Carbonation increased sourness, in agreement with previous literature (McLellan et al., J Food Sci 49:1595–1597, 1984; Yau and McDaniel, J Food Sci 57:1412–1416, 1992), but also suppressed sweetness. Interestingly, evaluation of beverages revealed the perception of a bitter aftertaste, which was primarily driven by CO2 level, enhanced by citric acid, and suppressed by increasing sugar concentration. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the sensory profile of a model carbonated beverage. Analysis provided novel evidence of the influence of multimodal interactions from gustatory, olfactory and trigeminal origin on sensory perception and highlighted the differential effects of two monosaccharides on key sensory attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouvet JF, Delaleu JC, Holley A (1987) Olfactory receptor cell-function is affected by trigeminal nerve activity. Neurosci Lett 77:181–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brand G (2006) Olfactory/trigeminal interactions in nasal chemoreception. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:908–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M (1999) Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. Br Med J 319:1393–1397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carstens E, Carstens MI, Dessirier JM, O'Mahony M, Simons CT, Sudo M, Sudo S (2002) It hurts so good: oral irritation by spices and carbonated drinks and the underlying neural mechanisms. Food Qual Prefer 13:431–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comettomuniz JE, Garciamedina MR, Calvino AM, Noriega G (1987) Interactions between Co2 oral pungency and taste. Perception 16:629–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowart BJ (1998) The addition of CO2 to traditional taste solutions alters taste quality. Chem Senses 23:397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delwiche J (2004) The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Qual Prefer 15:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessirier JM, O'Mahony M, Iodi-Carstens M, Carstens E (2000a) Sensory properties of citric acid: psychophysical evidence for sensitization, self-desensitization, cross-desensitization and cross-stimulus-induced recovery following capsaicin. Chem Senses 25:769–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dessirier JM, Simons CT, Carstens MI, O'Mahony M, Carstens E (2000b) Psychophysical and neurobiological evidence that the oral sensation elicited by carbonated water is of chemogenic origin. Chem Senses 25:277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eylam S, Kennedy LM (1998) Identification and characterization of human fructose or glucose taste variants with hypogeusia for one monosaccharide but not for the other. In "Olfaction and Taste Xii" vol. 855, pp 170–174

  • Eylam S, Kennedy LM, Stevens DA (1995) Potential human variants for glucose taste suggest separate fructose and glucose mechanisms. Chem Senses 20:77–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank RA, Byram J (1988) Taste smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem Senses 13:445–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore MM, Green BG (1993) Sensory irritation and taste produced by nacl and citric-acid—effects of capsaicin desensitization. Chem Senses 18:257–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green BG (1996) Chemesthesis: pungency as a component of flavor. Trends Food Sci Technol 7:415–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green BG, Alvarez-Reeves M, George P, Akirav C (2005) Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity. Physiol Behav 86:526–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper SJ, McDaniel MR (1993) Carbonated water lexicon—temperature and Co2 level influence on descriptive ratings. J Food Sci 58:893–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson L, Hollowood T, Chandra S, Hort J (2008) Taste-aroma interactions in a citrus flavoured model beverage system: similarities and differences between acid and sugar type. Food Qual Prefer 19:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Livermore A (2002) Intranasal chemosensory function of the trigeminal nerve and aspects of its relation to olfaction. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International, Z. (2007). The 2007 Soft Drinks Report

  • Isik U, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Cebeci D (2000) Comparison of oral glucose and sucrose solutions on pain response in neonates. J Pain 1:275–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kallithraka S, Bakker J, Clifford MN (1997) Effect of pH on astringency in model solutions and wines. J Agric Food Chem 45:2211–2216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes SM, Schmidt SI, Lee SY (2006a) Descriptive analysis of cola and lemon/lime carbonated beverages. J Food Sci 71:S583–S589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes SM, Schmidt SJ, Lee SY (2006b) Mouthfeel detection threshold and instrumental viscosity of sucrose and high fructose corn syrup solutions. J Food Sci 71:S597–S602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes SM, Schmidt SJ, Lee SY (2007) Relationship between physical properties and sensory attributes of carbonated beverages. J Food Sci 72:S1–S11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keast SJR, Breslin PAS (2003) An overview of binary taste–taste interactions. Food Qual Prefer 14:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King BM, Arents P, Bouter N, Duineveld CAA, Meyners M, Schroff SI, Soekhai ST (2006) Sweetener/sweetness-induced changes in flavor perception and flavor release of fruity and green character in beverages. J Agric Food Chem 54:2671–2677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kracke GR, Uthoff KA, Tobias JD (2005) Sugar solution analgesia: the effects of glucose on expressed mu opioid receptors. Anesth Analg 101:64–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless HT, Clark CC (1992) Psychological biases in time-intensity scaling. Food Technol 46:81

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless HT, Horne J, Giasi P (1996) Astringency of organic acids is related to pH. Chem Senses 21:397–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, C. L., Bodyfelt, F. W., and McDaniel, M. R. (1991). The Effect of Carbonation Level on the Sensory Properties of Flavored Milk Beverages 74, 2100-2108

  • McEvoy. (1998). Sensory evaluation of carbonated beverages utilizing a hyperbaric chamber or what would soda taste like if you could get inside the can? In:Chemical senses day XIV abstracts. Santa Rosa, CA. Chemical senses

  • McLellan MR, Barnard J, Queale DT (1984) Sensory analysis of carbonated apple juice using response-surface methodology. J Food Sci 49:1595–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahon DF, Roozen JP, DeGraaf C (1996) Sweetness flavour interactions in soft drinks. Food Chem 56:283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble AC (1996) Taste-aroma interactions. Trends Food Sci Technol 7:439–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odake S (2001) Sweetness intensity in low-carbonated beverages. Biomolecular Engineering 17:151–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pangborn RM (1960) Taste interrelationships. Food Research 25:245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangborn RM (1961) Taste interrelationships. 2. Suprathreshold solutions of sucrose and citric acid. J Food Sci 26:648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott J, Soo J, Campbell H, Robells C (2004) Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages. Physiol Behav 82:459–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott J, Stevenson RJ (1995a) Effects of oral pungency on tastes and flavors in mixtures. Chem Senses 20:87–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott J, Stevenson RJ (1995b) Pungency in food perception and preference. Food Rev Int 11:665–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramenghi LA, Evans DJ, Levene MI (1999) "Sucrose analgesia": absorptive mechanism or taste perception? Arch Dis Child 80:F146–F147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savant L, McDaniel MR (2004) Suppression of sourness: a comparative study involving mixtures of organic acids and sugars. Percept Psychophys 66:642–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifferstein HNJ (1995) Role of congruency in odor–taste interactions. Appetite 24:299–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifferstein HNJ, Frijters JER (1991) The effectiveness of different sweeteners in suppressing citric-acid sourness. Percept Psychophys 49:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shann F (2007) Suckling and sugar reduce pain in babies. Lancet 369:721–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons CT, Boucher Y, Carstens E (2003) Suppression of central taste transmission by oral capsaicin. J Neurosci 23:978–985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simons CT, Dessirier JM, Carstens MI, O'Mahony M, Carstens E (1999) Neurobiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying the oral sensation produced by carbonated water. J Neurosci 19:8134–8144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen JV, Engelen L (2006) The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: sensory integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:613–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters DE, Roy G (1996) Taste interactions of sweet and bitter compounds. In "Flavor–Food Interactions", Vol. 633, pp 130–142

  • Yau NJN, McDaniel MR (1992) Carbonation interactions with sweetness and sourness. J Food Sci 57:1412–1416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yau NJN, McDaniel MR, Bodyfelt FW (1989) Sensory Evaluation of Sweetened Flavored Carbonated Milk Beverages. J Dairy Sci 72:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with financial support from BBSRC and GSK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food Sciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, UK

    L. Hewson & J. Hort

  2. Sensory Dimensions, Nottingham, UK

    T. Hollowood

  3. Glaxo SmithKline, Coleford, UK

    S. Chandra

Authors
  1. L. Hewson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Hollowood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Chandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Hort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Hewson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewson, L., Hollowood, T., Chandra, S. et al. Gustatory, Olfactory and Trigeminal Interactions in a Model Carbonated Beverage. Chem. Percept. 2, 94–107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-009-9043-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-009-9043-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation