Abstract
A comprehensive analytical as well as numerical treatment of seismological, geological, geomorphological and geotechnical concepts has been implemented through microzonation projects in the northeast Indian provinces of Sikkim Himalaya and Guwahati city, representing cases of contrasting geological backgrounds — a hilly terrain and a predominantly alluvial basin respectively. The estimated maximum earthquakes in the underlying seismic source zones, demarcated in the broad northeast Indian region, implicates scenario earthquakes of M W 8.3 and 8.7 to the respective study regions for deterministic seismic hazard assessments. The microzonation approach as undertaken in the present analyses involves multi-criteria seismic hazard evaluation through thematic integration of contributing factors. The geomorphological themes for Sikkim Himalaya include surface geology, soil cover, slope, rock outcrop and landslide integrated to achieve geological hazard distribution. Seismological themes, namely surface consistent peak ground acceleration and predominant frequency were, thereafter, overlaid on and added with the geological hazard distribution to obtain the seismic hazard microzonation map of the Sikkim Himalaya. On the other hand, the microzonation study of Guwahati city accounts for eight themes — geological and geomorphological, basement or bedrock, landuse, landslide, factor of safety for soil stability, shear wave velocity, predominant frequency, and surface consistent peak ground acceleration. The five broad qualitative hazard classifications — ‘low’, ‘moderate’, ‘high’, ‘moderate high’ and ‘very high’ could be applied in both the cases, albeit with different implications to peak ground acceleration variations. These developed hazard maps offer better representation of the local specific seismic hazard variation in the terrain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki K 1988 Local site effects on strong ground motion; Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II — Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, June 27–30, Park City, Utah.
Ben-Menahem A, Aboodi E and Schild R 1974 The source of the great Assam earthquake — an interplate wedge motion; Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 9 265–289.
Beresenev I and Atkinson G M 1997 Modeling finite fault radiation from wn spectrum; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87 67–84.
Beresenev I and Atkinson G M 2001 Sub-event structure of large earthquakes — a ground motion perspective; Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 53–56.
Bhatia S C, Kumar M R and Gupta H K 1999 A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions; Annali di Geofisica 42 1153–1164.
Bilham R and England P 2001 Plateau ‘pop-up’ in the great 1897 Assam earthquake; Nature 410 806–809.
BIS 2002 IS1893-2002 (Part 1): Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structure Part 1 — Resistant Provisions and Buildings; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
Boatwright J, Fletcher J B and Fumal T E 1991 A general inversion scheme for source, site and propagation characteristics using multiple recorded sets of moderate-sized earthquakes; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81 1754–1782.
Boore D M 1983 Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73 1865–1894.
Boore D M and Atkinson G M 1987 Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hardrock sites in Eastern North America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77 440–467.
Borcherdt R D 1970 Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 60 29–61.
Field E H, Jacob K H and Hough S E 1992 Earthquake site response estimation: A weak motion case study; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 2283–2307.
Hanks T C and McGuire R K 1981 Character of high frequency ground motion; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 2071–2095.
Irdiss I M 1999 An update of the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential, Presentation Notes, Transportation Research Board’ 99Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction Analysis. Washington D.C., January 10, p. 21.
Idriss I M and Boulanger R W 2006 Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes; J. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Engg. 26 115–130.
ISC 2007 On-line Bulletin, http://www.isc.ac.uk/Bull,Internatl.; Seis. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom.
Jaiswal K and Sinha R 2007 Spatial variation of maximum considered and design basis earthquakes in peninsular India; Curr. Sci. 92 639–645.
Kijko A 2004 Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude m max; Pageoph 161 1–27.
Kijko A and Graham G 1998 “Parametric-Historic” Procedure for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis. Part I: Assessment of Maximum Regional Magnitude m max; Pageoph 152 413–442.
King J L and Tucker B E 1984 Observed variations of earthquake motion across a sediment-filled valley; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 137–151.
Knopoff L, Kagan Y Y and Knopoff R 1982 b-values for foreshocks and aftershocks in real and simulated earthquake sequences; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72 1663–1676.
Kramer S L 1996 Geotechnical earthquake engineering; Prentice-Hall international series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Lermo J and Chávez-García F J 1993 Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83 1574–1594.
Liao S S C and Whitman R V 1986 Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand; J. Geotech. Engg., ASCE 112 373–377.
Liao S S C, Veneziano D and Whitman R V 1988 Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability; J. Geotech. Engg., ASCE 114 389–411.
McGuire R K, Becker A M and Donovan N C 1984 Spectral estimates of seismic shear waves; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 2167–2185.
Motazedian D and Atkinson G M 2005 Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 995–1010.
Nakamura Y 1989 A method for dynamic characteristics estimations of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface; Q.R of R.T.R.I. 30 25–33.
Nandy D R 2001 Geodynamics of north eastern India and the adjoining region 1st edn., ACB Publications, Kolkata.
Nath S K 2004 Seismic hazard mapping and microzonation in the Sikkim Himalaya through GIS integration of site effects and strong ground motion attributes; Nat. Haz. 31 319–342.
Nath S K 2005 An Initial Model of Seismic Microzonation of Sikkim Himalaya through thematic mapping and GIS Integration of Geological and Strong Motion Features J. Asian Earth Sci. 25 329–343.
Nath S K, Chatterjee D, Biswas N N, Dravinski M, Cole D A, Papageorgiou A, Rodriguez J A and Poran C J 1997 Correlation Study of Shear Wave velocity in Near Surface Geological Formations in Anchorage, Alaska; Earthquake Spectra 13 55–75.
Nath S K, Sengupta P, Sengupta S and Chakrabarti A 2000 Site response estimation using strong motion network: A step towards microzonation of Sikkim Himalayas; Seismology 2000, Curr. Sci. 79 1316–1326.
Nath S K, Sengupta P and Kayal J R 2002 Determination of Site Response at Garhwal Himalaya from the aftershock sequence of 1999 Chamoli Earthquake; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 1072–1081.
Nath S K, Vyas M, Pal I and Sengupta P 2005 A Hazard Scenario in the Sikkim Himalaya from Seismotectonics Spectral Amplification Source Parameterization and Spectral Attenuation Laws using Strong Motion Seismometry; J. Geophys. Res. 110 B01301doi;10.1029/2004/2004JB003199.
Nath S K, Thingbaijam K K S, Raj A, Shukla K, Pal I, Nandy D R, Yadav M K, Bansal B K, Dasgupta S, Majumdar K, Kayal J R, Shukla A K, Deb S K, Pathak J, Hazarika P J and Paul D K 2007 Seismic Scenario of Guwahati City; Proc. Int. Workshop on Earthquake Haz. Mitigations 210–218.
Nath S K, Raj A, Sharma J, Thingbaijam K K S, Kumar A, Nandy D R, Yadav M K, Dasgupta S, Majumdar K, Kayal JR, Shukla A K, Deb SK, Pathak J, Hazarika P J, Paul D K and Bansal B K 2008 Site Amplification, Qs and source parameterization in Guwahati region from seismic and geotechnical analysis; Seis. Res. Lett. 79 526–539.
NBSS 1994 Master Plan for Irrigation Development Sikkim Govt. of Sikkim, Report 2, National Bureau of Soil Survey, Agricultural Finance Corporation Ltd. 35–47.
Ordonez G A 2004 SHAKE2000 A Computer Program for the 1D Analysis of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Problems, User’s Manual, 306 pp.
Saaty T L 1980 The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill International New York, New York, U.S.A.
Saragoni G R and Hart G C 1974 Simulation of artificial earthquakes; Earthquake Engg. Struct. Dyn. 2 249–267.
Seed H B and Idriss I M 1971 Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential; J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE 97 1249–1273.
Seed H B, Yokimatsu K, Harder L F and Chung R M 1985 Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation; J. Geotech. Engg., ASCE 111 1425–1445.
Singh S K, Mohanty W K, Bansal B K and Roonwal G S 2002 Ground motion in Delhi from future Large/Great Earthquakes in the Central Seismic Gap of the Himalayan arc; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 555–569.
Thingbaijam K K S and Nath S K 2008 Estimation of Maximum Earthquakes in northeast India region; Pageoph 165 1–13.
Thingbaijam KKS, Nath SK, Yadav A, Raj A, Walling Y M and Mohanty W K 2008 Recent Seismicity in northeast India and its adjoining Region; J. Seismol. 12 107–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nath, S.K., Thingbaijam, K.K.S. & Raj, A. Earthquake hazard in Northeast India — A seismic microzonation approach with typical case studies from Sikkim Himalaya and Guwahati city. J Earth Syst Sci 117 (Suppl 2), 809–831 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0070-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0070-6