Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social and ethical dimensions of nanoscale science and engineering research

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuing advances in human ability to manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular levels (i.e. nanoscale science and engineering) offer many previously unimagined possibilities for scientific discovery and technological development. Paralleling these advances in the various science and engineering subdisciplines is the increasing realization that a number of associated social, ethical, environmental, economic and legal dimensions also need to be explored. An important component of such exploration entails the identification and analysis of the ways in which current and prospective researchers in these fields conceptualize these dimensions of their work. Within the context of a National Science Foundation funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program in nanomaterials processing and characterization at the University of Central Florida (2002–2004), here I present for discussion (i) details of a “nanotechnology ethics” seminar series developed specifically for students participating in the program, and (ii) an analysis of students’ and participating research faculty’s perspectives concerning social and ethical issues associated with nanotechnology research. I conclude with a brief discussion of implications presented by these issues for general scientific literacy and public science education policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roe, A. (1961) The psychology of the scientist, Science, 134: 456–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bird, S.J. (2002) The processes of science, in: Spier, R. (ed), Science and technology ethics, Routledge, New York, pp. 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brumfiel, G. (2003) A little knowledge..., Nature, 424: 246–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb, M.D. & Macoubrie, J. (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6: 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulinowski, K. (2004) Nanotechnology: from “wow” to “yuck”?, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelsall, R. W., Hamley, I. W. & Geoghegan, M. (eds) (2005) Nanoscale science and technology, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roco, M.C. (1999) Nanoparticles and nanotechnology research, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalbunde, K.J. (ed.) (2001) Nanoscale materials in chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Research Council. (2002) Implications of emerging micro- and nanotechnologies, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, J.Z., Wang, Z., Chen, S. & Liu, G. (2003) Self-assembled nanostructures, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, M., Kannangara, K., Smith, G., Simmons, M. & Raguse, B. (2002) Nanotechnology: basic science and emerging technologies, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nalwa, H.S. (ed.) (2002) Nanostructured materials and nanotechnology, Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta, M.D. (2002) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: assessing the nature of innovation in these fields, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 22: 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drexler, K.E. (1987) Engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology, Anchor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drexler, K.E. (1992) Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing and computation, Wiley Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smalley, R.E. (2001) Nanofallacies: of chemistry, love, and nanobots, Scientific American, 285: 76–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baum, R. (2003) Nanotechnology: Drexler and Smalley make the case for and against “molecular assemblers”, Chemical & Engineering News, 81: 37–42. Available online: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/8148/8148counterpoint.html

    Google Scholar 

  18. Drexler, K.E. (2004) Nanotechnology: From Feynman to funding, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bueno, O. (2004) The Drexler-Smalley debate on nanotechnology: incommensurability at work? HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 10: 83–98. Available online: http://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/10-2/bueno.htm

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, R.A.L. (2004) Soft machines: nanotechnology and life, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Center for Responsible Nanotechnology. (2005) Available online: http://www.crnano.org/

  22. The Foresight Institute. (2005) Available online: http://www.foresight.org/

  23. Feynman, R.P. (1959) There’s plenty of room at the bottom: an invitation to enter a new field of physics. Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society, California Institute of Technology, December 29th, 1959; available online: http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html

  24. Berne, R.W. (2004) Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10: 627–638.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maslow, A. (1943) A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, 50: 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maslow, A. (1970) Motivation and personality (2nd edition), Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Habermas, J. (1972) Knowledge and human interests (2nd edition), Heinemann, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Habermas, J. (1987) Theory of communicative action, Beacon, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roco, M.C. & Bainbridge, W.S. (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roco, M.C. (2004) The US National Nanotechnology Initiative after 3 years (2001–2003), Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roco, M.C. (2003) Broader societal issues of nanotechnology, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5: 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roco, M.C. & Bainbridge, W.S. (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science, National Science Foundation/U.S. Department of Commerce, Arlington, VA. Available online: http://www.wtec.org/Converging Technologies/.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mulhall, D. (2002) Our molecular future: how nanotechnology, robotics, genetics and artificial intelligence will transform our world, Prometheus Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roco, M.C. (2003) Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: opportunities for education and training, Nature Biotechnology, 21: 1247–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roco, M.C. & Montemagno, C.D. (eds) (2004) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies (Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 1013, May 2004), The New York Academy of Sciences, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Montemagno, C.D. (2004) Integrative technology for the twenty-first century, in: Roco, M.C. & Montemagno, C.D. (eds), The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies (Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 1013, May 2004), The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schummer, J. (2004) “Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology”: meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8: Available online: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v8n2/schummer.html.

  38. Lewenstein, B.V. (2005) What counts as a ‘social and ethical issue’ in nanotechnology? Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 11: 5–18. Available online: http://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/11-1/lewenstein.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pool, R. (2003) How society shapes technology, in: Teich, A. H. (ed.), Technology and the future (9th edition), Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA, pp. 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mumford, L. (1963) Technics and civilization (first published in 1934), Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bauer, M. (ed) (1995) Resistance to new technology: nuclear power, information technology and biotechnology, Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson, P.B. (1997) Food biotechnology in ethical perspective, Blackie Academic & Professional/Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yount, L. (2000) Biotechnology and genetic engineering, Facts On File, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sherlock, R. & Morrey, J.D. (eds) (2002) Ethical issues in biotechnology, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fukuyama, F. (2003) Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution, Picador, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fumento, M. (2003) Bioevolution: how biotechnology is changing our world, Encounter Books, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Magill, G. (ed) (2004) Genetics and ethics: an interdisciplinary study, St. Louis University Press, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wolfson, J.R. (2003) Social and ethical issues in nanotechnology: lessons learned from biotechnology and other high technologies, Biotechnology Law Report, 22: 376–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mehta, M.D. (2004) From biotechnology to nanotechnology: what can we learn from earlier technologies? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24: 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Einsiedel, E.F. & Goldenberg, L. (2004) Dwarfing the social? nanotechnology lessons from the biotechnology front, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24: 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pilarski, L.M., Mehta, M.D., Caulfield, T., Kaler, K.V. & Backhouse, C.J. (2004) Microsystems and nanoscience for biomedical applications: a view to the future, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24: 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lane, N. (2001) The grand challenges of nanotechnology, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3: 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. National Science Foundation. (2005) Research experiences for undergraduates, available online: http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/reu/start.htm.

  54. National Research Council. (1999) Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering and technology, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sweeney, A.E., Seal, S. & Vaidyanathan, P. (2003) The promises and perils of nanoscience and nanotechnology: exploring emerging social and ethical issues, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23: 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sweeney, A.E., Vaidyanathan, P. & Seal, S. (2006) Undergraduate research and education in nanotechnology, International Journal of Engineering Education, 22: 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Proctor, R.N. (1991) Value-free science? purity and power in modern knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ziman, J.M. (1996) Is science losing its objectivity?, Nature, 382: 751–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ziman, J.M. (1998) Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be?, Science, 282: 1813–1814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ziman, J.M. (2001) Getting scientists to think about what they are doing, Science and Engineering Ethics, 7: 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yager, R.E. (1990) STS: thinking over the years, The Science Teacher, 57: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yager, R.E. (1996) Science/technology/society as reform in science education, State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Martin, M.W. & Schinzinger, R. (1996) Ethics in engineering (3rd edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Spier, R. (2001) Ethics, tools and the engineer, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ellul, J. (1967) The technological society, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ellul, J. (1980) The technological system, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Feenberg, A. (1991) Critical theory of technology, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vanderburg, W. H. (2000) The labyrinth of technology, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Crichton, M. (2002) Prey, Avon Books/HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Phoenix, C. & Drexler, K.E. (2004). Safe exponential manufacturing, Nanotechnology, 15: 869–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Helland, A. (2004) Nanoparticles: a closer look at the risks to human health and the environment. Perceptions and precautionary measures of industry and regulatory bodies in Europe (M.Sc. thesis in Environmental Management & Policy), The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  72. The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering. (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering, London, UK. Available online: http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (1996) Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Science & Public Policy, 23: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (eds) (1997) Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Pinter, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Polity Press/Blackwell Publishers, Ltd., Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Demain, A.L. (2001) The relationship between universities and industry: the American university perspective, Food Technology & Biotechnology, 39: 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Henderson, J.A. & Smith, J.J. (2002) Academia, industry and the Bayh-Dole Act: an implied duty to commercialize, Center for the Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT), Cambridge, MA. Available online: http://www.cimit.org/coi_part3.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Thursby, J.G. & Thursby, M.C. (2003) University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act, Science, 301: 1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Stevens, A.J. (2004) The enactment of Bayh-Dole, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29: 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Soley, L.C. (1995) Leasing the ivory tower: the corporate takeover of academia, South End Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Krimsky, S. (1999) The profit of scientific discovery and its normative implications, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 75: 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Coppola, B.P. (2001) The technology transfer dilemma: preserving morally responsible education in a utilitarian entrepreneurial academic culture, Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7: 155–167. Available online: http://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/7/coppola.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Bok, D. (2003) Universities in the marketplace: the commercialization of higher education, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kirp, D.L. (2003) Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: the marketing of higher education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Stein, D.G. (ed.) (2004) Buying in or selling out? the commercialization of the American research university, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Mazzola, L. (2003) Commercializing nanotechnology, Nature Biotechnology, 21: 1137–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Paull, R., Wolfe, J., Hébert, P. & Sinkula, M. (2003) Investing in nanotechnology, Nature Biotechnology, 21: 1144–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Petersen, J.L. & Egan, D.M. (2002) Small security: nanotechnology and future defense, Defense Horizons, 8: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Altmann, J. (2004) Military uses of nanotechnology: perspectives and concerns, Security Dialogue, 35: 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Ratner, D. & Ratner, M.A. (2004) Nanotechnology and homeland security: new weapons for new wars, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Newberry, B. (2004) The dilemma of ethics in engineering education, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10: 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Martin, M.W. (2002) Personal meaning and ethics in engineering, Science and Engineering Ethics, 8: 545–560.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Masciangioli, T. & Zhang, W-X. (2003) Environmental technologies at the nanoscale: potential and pitfalls, Environmental Science & Technology, 37: 102A-108A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Oberdörster, E. (2004) Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass, Environmental Health Perspectives, 112: 1058–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Dreher, K.L. (2004) Health and environmental impact of nanotechnology:toxicological assessment of manufactured nanoparticles, Toxicological Sciences, 77: 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Warheit, D.B., Laurence, B.R., Reed, K.L., Roach, D.H., Reynolds, G.A.M. & Webb, T.R. (2004) Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats, Toxicological Sciences, 77: 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Hood, E. (2004) Nanotechnology: looking as we leap, Environmental Health Perspectives, 112: A740-A749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Vanderburg, W.H. (1995) Preventive engineering: strategy for dealing with negative social and environmental implications of technology, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 121: 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Vanderburg, W. H (1999) On the measurement and integration of sustainability in engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, 88: 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Vanderburg, W.H. & Khan, N. (1994) How well is engineering education incorporating societal issues?, Journal of Engineering Education, 83: 357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Young, S.B. & Vanderburg, W. H. (1992) A materials life cycle framework for preventive engineering, IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 11: 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Devon, R. & van de Poel, I. (2004) Design ethics: the social ethics paradigm, International Journal of Engineering Education, 20: 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Mnyusiwalla, A., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P.A. (2003) “Mind the gap”: science and ethics in nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, 14: R9-R13. Available online: http://stacks.iop.org/Nano/14/R9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Bainbridge, W.S. (2002) Public attitudes towards nanotechnology, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4: 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. BMRB Social Research. (2004) Nanotechnology: views of the general public, BMRB International Limited, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Bainbridge, W. S. (2004) Sociocultural meanings of nanotechnology: research methodologies, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6: 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Wilsdon, J. & Willis, R. (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream, Demos, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wood, S., Jones, R.A.L. & Geldart, A. (2003) The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology, Economic & Social Research Council, Swindon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Hett, A. (2004) Nanotechnology: small motter, many unknowns, Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Devon, R. (1999) Towards a social ethics of engineering: the norms of engagement, Journal of Engineering Education, 88: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  112. van der Poel, I., Zandvoort, H. & Brumsen, M. (2001) Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: contents, educational setup and experiences, Science and Engineering Ethics, 7: 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Hauser-Kastenberg, G., Kastenberg, W.E. & Norris, D. (2003) Towards emergent ethical action and the culture of engineering, Science and Engineering Ethics, 9: 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Lincourt, J. & Johnson, R. (2004) Ethics training: a genuine dilemma for engineering educators, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10: 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Khushf, G. (2004) Systems theory and the ethics of human enhancement: a framework for NBIC convergence, in: Roco, M.C. & Montemagno, C.D. (eds), The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies (Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 1013, May 2004), The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 124–149.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Berne, R.W. (2006) Nanotalk: conversations with scientists and engineers about ethics, meaning, and belief in the development of nanotechnology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Fishbine, G. (2002) The investor’s guide to nanotechnology and micromachines, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Uldrich, J. & Newberry, D. (2003) The next big thing is really small: how nanotechnology will change the future of your business, Crown Business/Random House, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Waite, S.R. (2004) Quantum investing: quantum physics, nanotechnology, and the future of the stock market, Texere/Thomson Learning, Mason, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Miller, J.C., Serrato, R. M., Represas-Cardenas, J. M. & Kundahl, G.A. (2005) The handbook of nanotechnology: business, policy, and international property law, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education, College of Education (123L), University of Central Florida, 32816-1250, Orlando, FL, USA

    Aldrin E. Sweeney Ph.D. (Associate Professor)

Authors
  1. Aldrin E. Sweeney Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldrin E. Sweeney Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sweeney, A.E. Social and ethical dimensions of nanoscale science and engineering research. SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 435–464 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0044-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0044-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation