Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Synthetic biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstruction

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence increase with age. The increasing proportion of the aging female population is likely to result in a demand for care of pelvic floor prolapse and incontinence. Experimental evidence of altered connective tissue metabolism may predispose to pelvic floor dysfunction, supporting the use of biomaterials, such as synthetic mesh, to correct pelvic fascial defects. Re-establishing pelvic support and continence calls for a biomaterial to be inert, flexible, and durable and to simultaneously minimize infection and erosion risk. Mesh as a biomaterial has evolved considerably throughout the past half century to the current line that combines ease of use, achieves good outcomes, and minimizes risk. This article explores the biochemical basis for pelvic floor attenuation and reviews various pelvic reconstructive mesh materials, their successes, failures, complications, and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Beiko D, Knudsen BE, Watterson JD, et al.: Biomaterials in Urology. Curr Urol Rep 2003, 4:51–55. An excellent review of general information that is pertinent to all biomaterials.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al.: Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:501–506. Specific types of different synthetic materials are discussed in detail.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L: Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188:108–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen B, Wen Y, Wang H, et al.: Differences in estrogen modulation of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression in cultured fibroblasts from continent and incontinent women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, DeSautel M, Anderson A, et al.: Collagen synthesis is not altered in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004, 23:367–373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haab F, Zimmern P, Leach G: Female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency: recognition and management. J Urol 1996, 156:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamb JP, Vitale T, Kamenski DL: Comparative evaluation of synthetic meshes used for abdominal replacement. Surgery 1983, 93:643–648.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tyrell J, Silberman H, Chandrasoma P, et al.: Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989, 168:277–233.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner J: Mesh materials in hernia repair. In Inguinal Hernia Repair: Expert Meeting on Hernia Surgery. Edited by Schumpelick V, Wantz GE. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1995:172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al.: Prospective, randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrences of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184:1357–1364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, et al.: Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 185:1299–1306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boublil V, Ciofu C, Traxer O, et al.: Complications of urethral sling procedures. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002, 14:515–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cosson M, Debodinance P, Boukerrou M, et al.: Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: Which is the ideal material? Int Urogynecol J 2003, 14:169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duckett JR, Constantine G: Complications of silicone sling insertion for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2000, 163:1835–1837.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobashi KC, Govier FE: Management of vaginal erosion of polypropylene slings. J Urol 2003, 169:2242–2243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walters MD: The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: Does the evidence support our surgical practice? Int Urogynecol J 2003, 14:365–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamussino K, Hanzal E, Kolle D, et al.: The Austrian Tension-Free Vaginal Tape registry: an update. Int Urogynecol J 2001, 12(suppl 3):S22.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC, et al.: Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at 3-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Urology 2004, 63:671–675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietz HP, Foote AJ, Mak HL, et al.: TVT and Sparc suburethral slings: a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004, 15:129–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng LH, Wang AC, Lin YH, et al.: Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005, 16:230–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deval B, Levardon M, Samain E, et al.: A French multicenter clinical trial of SPARC for stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2003, 44:254–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Primus G: SPARC-sling system for the treatment of female urodynamic stress: a prospective study with two years follow up [Abstract #63]. Abstract presented at the European Urological Association Annual Meeting. Istanbul, Turkey: March 17–19, 2005.

  23. Ryu KH, Shin JS, Du JK, et al.: Randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) vs. tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: comparison of operation related morbidity [Abstract #50]. Abstract presented at the European Urological Association Annual Meeting. Istanbul, Turkey: March 17–19, 2005.

  24. Waltregny D, Reul O, Keppenne V, et al.: Inside-out transobturator vaginal tape (TVT-O): one year results of a prospective study [Abstract #53]. Abstract presented at the European Urological Association Annual Meeting. Istanbul, Turkey: March 17–19, 2005.

  25. Roumeguere T, Quackels T, Bollens R, et al.: Transobturator vaginal tape (TOT) for the treatment of female stress incontinence: one year follow up in 100 patients [Abstract #56]. Abstract presented at the European Urological Association Annual Meeting. Istanbul, Turkey: March 17–19, 2005.

  26. Katz E, Khater U, Ghoniem G: Is transobturator tape (TOT) effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) [Poster #13]? Presented at the Society of Urodynamics and Female Urology Winter Meeting. Orlando: February 2005.

  27. Cerezuela JF, Luelmo E, Medina N, et al.: Readjustable sling: Remeex long term results [Abstract #709]. Presented at the International Continence Society/International Urogynecologic Association Joint Meeting. Paris: August 23–27, 2004.

  28. Maroum B, Mattos I, Munoz F, et al.: Analyze and review of the percentage of readjustment in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence using a readjustable sling Remeex system [Abstract #685]. Presented at the International Continence Society/International Urogynecologic Association Joint Meeting. Paris: August 23–27, 2004.

  29. Julian TM: The efficacy of marlex mesh in the repair of severe recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior mid vaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 175:1472–1475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Flood CG, Drutz HP, Waja L: Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles. Int Urogynecol J 1998, 9:200–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Natale F, Marziali S, Cervigni M: Tension-free cystocele repair (TRC): long-term follow-up. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association. Rome: October 22–25, 2000.

  32. Debodinance P, Cosson M, Burlet G: Tolerance of synthetic tissues in touch with vaginal scare: review to the point of 287 cases. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol 1999, 87:23–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bent AE, Ostergard DR, Zwick-Zaffuto M: Tissue reaction to expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling for urinary incontinence: clinical and histologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993, 169:1198–1204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA: Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 2004, 111:831–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. deTayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, et al.: Combined genital prolapse repair reinforced with a polypropylene mesh and tension-free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective case-control study with short-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:950–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Birch C, Fynes MM: The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002, 14:527–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kenton KS, Woods MP, Brubaker L: Uncomplicated erosion of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts into the rectum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 187:233–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, et al.: Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 187:1473–1482. Comprehensive review of a variety of mesh material for sacrocolpopexy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al.: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:805–823.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rane AM, Naidu AK, Barry CL, et al.: Total anterior vaginal wall repair via a transobturator system: a pilot study [Abstract #5]. Presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Rancho Mirage, CA: April 4–6, 2005.

  41. Comiter CV, Colgrove PM: High rate of vaginal extrusion of silicone-coated polyester sling. Urology 2004, 63:1066–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Lee SL, et al.: Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J Urol 1999, 162:2070–2072.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Clemens JQ, DeLancy JO, Faerber GJ, et al.: Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 2000, 56:589–595. Excellent management points.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Choe JC: Vaginal erosion caused by antibacterial mesh sling. J Urol 2002, 168:1504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carr LK, Webster GD: Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 1997, 157:821–823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nitti VW, Raz S: Obstruction following anti-incontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 1994, 152:93–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Leng WW, Chancellor MB: Recognition and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery. Rev Urol 2004, 6:29–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rardin CR, Rosenblatt PL, Kohli N, et al.: Release of tensionfree vaginal tape for the treatment of refractory postoperative voiding dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 100:898–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cundiff GW, Fenner D: Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:1403–1421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Elzevier H, Lycklama A, Nijeholt G: Sexual function after tensionfree vaginal tape (TVT) for stress urinary incontinence: results of a mailed questionnaire [Abstract #732]. Presented at the International Continence Society/International Urogynecologic Association Joint Meeting. Paris: August 23–27, 2004.

  51. Mazouni C, Karsenty G, Bretelle F, et al.: Urinary complications and sexual function after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:955–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Maaita M, Bhaumik J, Davies AE: Sexual function after using tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical treatment of genuine stress incontinence. BJU Int 2002, 90:540–543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Glavind K, Tetsche MS: Sexual function in women before and after suburethral sling operation for stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective questionnaire study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:965–968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, et al.: Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG 2005, 112:107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yan A, Anne M, Karine A, et al.: Cystocele repair by a synthetic vaginal mesh secured anteriorly through the obturator foramen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004, 115:90–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Goh TW, Dwyer PL: Effectiveness and safety of polypropylene mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2001, 12:S90.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shah DK, Paul EM, Amukele S, et al.: Broad-based tension-free synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year outcome. J Urol 2003, 170:849–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Shah DK, Paul EM, Rastinehad AR, et al.: Short-term outcome analysis of total reconstruction with mesh: the vaginal approach. J Urol 2004, 171:261–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bukkapatnam R, Rodriguez LV: Synthetic sling options for stress urinary incontinence. Curr Urol Rep 2004, 5:374–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76 Avenue, 11040, New Hyde Park, NY, USA

    Gopal H. Badlani MD

Authors
  1. Matthew E. Karlovsky MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leslie Kushner PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gopal H. Badlani MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlovsky, M.E., Kushner, L. & Badlani, G.H. Synthetic biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstruction. Curr Urol Rep 6, 376–384 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-005-0057-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-005-0057-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation