Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Augmented repairs and use of interposition grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery: Part II

  • Published:
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Part I of this review on graft interposition for pelvic organ prolapse focused on the properties of biologic and synthetic materials used in vaginal reconstructive surgery and on the widespread use of these materials in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Part II focuses on prosthetic reinforcement during reconstructive surgical procedures involving the middle compartment (vaginal vault and apex) and posterior compartment (rectocele). The new “minimally invasive” kits directed at total pelvic floor reconstruction are discussed in this context. We conclude with a review of the unique complications associated with graft interposition and their management, as well as a discussion of areas to direct future research with the intent of promoting a greater understanding of the role and use of prosthetic grafts during pelvic reconstructive surgical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Lo TS, Horng SG, Huang HJ, et al.: Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005, 84:992–995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah DK, Paul EM, Rastinehad AR, et al.: Short-term outcome analysis of total pelvic reconstruction with mesh: the vaginal approach. J Urol 2004, 171:261–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutman MP, Deng DY, Rodriguez LV, Raz S: Repair of vaginal vault prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using polypropylene mesh. Neurourol Urodyn 2005, 24:654–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petros PE: Vault prolapse II: Restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12:296–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jordaan DJ, Prollius A, Cronje HS, Nel M: Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17:326–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farnsworth BN: Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002, 13:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Biertho I, Dallemagne B, Dewandre JM, et al.: Intravaginal slingplasty: short term results. Acta Chir Belg 2004, 104:700–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petros PE, Richardson PA: Tissue fixation system posterior sling for repair of uterine/vault prolapse: a preliminary report. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 45:376–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al.: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:805–823.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole EE, Leu PB, Gomelsky A, et al.: Histopathological evaluation of the uterosacral ligament: is this a dependable structure for pelvic reconstruction? BJU Int 2006, 97:345–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemack GE, Zimmern PE, Blander DS: The levator myorraphy repair for vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 2000, 56(6 Suppl 1):50–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Amrute KV, Eisenberg ER, Rastinehad AR, et al.: Analysis of outcomes of single polypropylene mesh in total pelvic floor reconstruction. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:53–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amid PK: Classification of biomaterials and their related complication in abdominal wall surgery. Hernia 1997, I:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DeLancey JO: Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992, 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724, discussion 1724–1728.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baessler K, Hewson AD, Tunn R, et al.: Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106:713–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson AC: The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993, 36:976–983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B: Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:95–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Laarhoven CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, et al.: Relationship between anatomic and symptomatic long-term results after rectocele repair for impaired defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1999, 42:204–210, discussion 210–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kohli N, Miklos JR: Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:146–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobashi KC, Leach GE, Frederick R, et al.: Initial experience with rectocele repair using nonfrozen cadaveric fascia lata interposition. Urology 2005, 66:1203–1207, discussion 1207–1208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dell JR, O’Kelley KR: PelviSoft BioMesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005, 16:44–47, discussion 47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Altman D, Zetterstrom J, Mellgren A, et al.: A three-year prospective assessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 107:59–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Tayrac R, Picone O, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H: A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17:100–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim YN, Rane A, Muller R: An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005, 16:126–131, discussion 131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mercer-Jones MA, Sprowson A, Varma JS: Outcome after transperineal mesh repair of rectocele: a case series. Dis Colon Rectum 2004, 47:864–868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J, et al.: Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1 year functional and anatomic outcome in a prospective multicentre study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, 18:251–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA: Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 2004, 111:831–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, et al.: Functional and anatomic outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG 2005, 112:107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahn MA, Stanton SL: Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:82–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maher C, Baessler K: Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17:84–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miklos JR, Kohli N, Moore R: Levatorplasty release and reconstruction of rectovaginal septum using allogenic dermal graft. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002, 13:44–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, et al.: An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 179(6 Pt 1):1451–1456, discussion 1456–1457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, et al.: The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 181:1353–1358, discussion 1358–1359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Oster S, Astrup A: A new vaginal operation for recurrent and large rectocele using dermis transplant. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981, 60:493–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Parker MC, Phillips RK: Repair of rectocoele using Marlex mesh. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993, 75:193–194.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, et al.: Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 177:1345–1353, discussion 1353–1355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fox SD, Stanton SL: Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. BJOG 2000, 107:1371–1375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sullivan ES, Longaker CJ, Lee PY: Total pelvic mesh repair: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:857–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC: Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 185:1388–1395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sentilhes L, Sergent F, Resch B, et al.: Posthysterectomy posterior compartment prolapse: preliminary results of a novel transvaginal surgical procedure using polypropylene mesh via the low transobturator route [in French]. Ann Chir 2006, 131:533–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al.: Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184:1357–1362, discussion 1362–1364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cosson M, Caquant F, Collinet P, et al.: Prolift mesh (Gynecare) for pelvic organ prolapse. Surgical treatment using the TVM group technique: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Presented at the International Continence Society Annual Meeting. Montreal, Canada; August 28–September 2005.

  43. Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, et al.: Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17:315–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Rohne J, et al.: Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, Jan 12 [Epub ahead of print].

  45. Davila GW, Drutz H, Deprest J: Clinical implications of the biology of grafts: conclusions of the 2005 IUGA Grafts Roundtable. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17(Suppl 1):S51–S55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Coda A, Bendavid R, Botto-Micca F, et al.: Structural alterations of prosthetic meshes in humans. Hernia 2003, 7:29–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Davila GW: Introduction to the 2005 IUGA Grafts Roundtable. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17(Suppl 7):4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mourtzinos A, Raz S: Repair of vaginal vault prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using polypropylene mesh. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006, 18:555–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Maher C, Baessler K: Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17:195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A-1302 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN, 37232-2765, USA

    Roger R. Dmochowski MD

Authors
  1. Jonathan S. Starkman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanna Togami MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Christian Winters MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roger R. Dmochowski MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger R. Dmochowski MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Starkman, J.S., Togami, J., Winters, J.C. et al. Augmented repairs and use of interposition grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery: Part II. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 2, 143–154 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-007-0013-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-007-0013-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation