Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of heavy metal removal efficiencies in four activated sludge processes

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The removal efficiencies of heavy metals (As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were investigated in the 17 operating municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and compared with those in four main activated sludge processes. Significant differences of heavy metal removal efficiencies were observed among four activated sludge processes. The removal efficiency for As (75.5%) in the oxidation ditch (OD) process is significantly higher than that in the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process (38.6%) or sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process (51.4%). The mean removal efficiencies for Cu and Ni in the OD process are 90.5% and 46.7%, respectively, while low mean removal efficiencies are observed for Cu (69.9%) and Ni (16.5%), respectively, in the SBR process. The removal efficiencies for Cu and Ni in the OD process are significantly higher than those in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A2-O) process. These results highlight the differences of removal efficiencies for heavy metals in different processes and should be considered when selecting a wastewater treatment process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ALDRICH A P, KISTLER D, SIGG L. Speciation of Cu and Zn in drainage water from agricultural soils [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(22): 4824–4830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. SONG Y F, WILKE B M, SONG X Y, GONG P, ZHOU Q X, YANG G F. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals (HMs) as well as their genotoxicity in soil after long-term wastewater irrigation [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(10): 1859–1868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. KAN S, CAO Q, ZHENG Y M, HUANG Y Z, ZHU Y G. Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China [J]. Environment Pollution, 2008, 152(3): 686–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WAN NGAH W S, HANAFIAH M A K M. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: A review [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(10): 3935–3948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SIM W J, LEE J W, SHIN S K, SONG K B, OH J E. Assessment of fates of estrogens in wastewater and sludge from various types of wastewater treatment plants [J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(10): 1448–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WANG Jian-gong, LI Xue-min. Electrochemical treatment of wastewater containing chlorophenols using boron-doped diamond film electrodes [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(7): 1946–1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LU Jie, YAN Xue, MA Yan-fei, TIAN Cai-xing, DING Jin-cheng. Impact of salinity on treatment of saline wastewater by sequencing batch biofilm reactor process [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(5): 1989–1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KARVELAS M, KATSOYIANNIS A, SAMARA C. Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in the wastewater treatment process [J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 53(10): 1201–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BATTISTONI P, FAVA G, RUELLO M L. Heavy metal shock load in activated sludge uptake and toxic effects [J]. Water Research, 1993, 27(5): 821–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KUMAR J, BALOMAJUMDER C, MONDAL P. Application of agro-based biomasses for zinc removal from wastewater—A review [J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2011, 39(7): 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. HASHIMOTO T, ONDA K, NAKAMURA Y, TADA K, MIYA A, MURAKAMI T. Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process [J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(10): 2117–2126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CHANPIWAT P, STHIANNOPKAO S, KIM K W. Metal content variation in wastewater and biosludge from Bangkok’s central wastewater treatment plants [J]. Microchemical Journal, 2010, 95(2): 326–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YAN G, VIRARAGHAVAN T. Heavy-metal removal from aqueous solution by fungus Mucor rouxii [J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(18): 4486–4496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CHEN Y, GU G. Preliminary studies on continuous chromium (VI) biological removal from wastewater by anaerobic-aerobic activated sludge process [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(15): 1713–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SALIHOGLU N K. Assessment of urban source metal levels in influent, effluent, and sludge of two municipal biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants of Bursa, an industrial city in Turkey [J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2013, 41(2): 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ANWAR A, RUMANA G, WAN M. Cd(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) removal from contaminated water by biosorption using activated sludge biomass [J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2010, 38(2): 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SIRIANUNTAPIBOON S, HONGSRISUWAN T. Removal of Zn2+ and Cu2+ by a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(4): 808–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ÜSTÜN G E. Occurrence and removal of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 17(2/3): 833–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CHIPASA K B. Accumulation and fate of selected heavy metals in a biological wastewater treatment system [J]. Waste Management, 2003, 23(2): 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. OLIVEIRA ADA S, BOCIO A, TREVILATO T M, TAKAYANAGUI A M, DOMINGO J L, SEGURA-MUÑOZ S I. Heavy metals in untreated/treated urban effluent and sludge from a biological wastewater treatment plant [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research–International, 2007, 14(7): 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [M]. 20th ed. Washington, DC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. CEM. Microware acid digestion of sludges, sediments, soil and oils [EB/OL] [1994-01-04]. http://www.cem.de/documents/pdf/ publikation/digestion/RD055.pdf.

  23. CHANG D, FUKUSHI K, GHOSH S. Simulation of activated sludge cultures for enhanced heavy metals removal [J]. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(5): 822–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WANG J M, HUANG C P, ALLEN H E, POESPONEGORO I, POESPONEGORO HTAKIYAMA L R. Effects of dissolved organic matter and pH on heavy metal uptake by sludge particulates exemplified by copper(II) and nickel(II): Three-variable model [J]. Water Environment Research, 1999, 71(2): 139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. SÖRME L, LAGERKVIST R. Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 298(1/2/3): 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. DOU X, LI R, ZHAO B, LIANG W. Arsenate removal from water by zero-valent iron/activated carbon galvanic couples [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 182(1-3): 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. CHEVALIER P, PROULX D, LESSARD P, VINCENT W F, NOUE J. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal by high latitude mat-forming cyanobacteria for potential use in tertiary wastewater treatment [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2000, 12(2): 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. GUO C H, STABNIKOV V, IVANOV V. The removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from reject water of municipal wastewater treatment plant using ferric and nitrate bioreductions [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(11): 3992–3999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. XU X, GAO B Y, YUE Q Y, ZHONG Q Q. Preparation of agricultural by-product based anion exchanger and its utilization for nitrate and phosphate removal [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 101(22): 8558–8564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. GAO Y, MUCCI A. Individual and competitive adsorption of phosphate and arsenate on goethite in artificial seawater [J]. Chemical Geology, 2003, 199(1/2): 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. CARABANTE I, GRAHN M, HOLMGREN A, HEDLUND J. In situ ATR–FTIR studies on the competitive adsorption of arsenate and phosphate on ferrihydrite [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 351(2): 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. HOFFMAN D, KRINGLE R. A total error approach for the validation of quantitative analytical methods [J]. Pharmaceutical Research, 2007, 24(6): 1157–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. STANLEY C R, O’DRISCOLL N, RANJAN P. Determining the magnitude of true analytical error in geochemical analysis [J]. Geochemistry: Exploration Environment Analysis, 2010, 10(4): 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  34. AL-QODAH Z. Biosorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by activated sludge [J]. Desalination, 2006, 196(1/2/3): 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. PAGNANELLI F, MAINELLI S, BORNORONI L, DIONISI D, TORO L. Mechanisms of heavy-metal removal by activated sludge [J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(8): 1028–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. SASSI M, BESTANI B, SAID A H, BENDERDOUCHE N, GUIBAL E. Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by a local dairy sludge as a biosorbant [J]. Desalination, 2010, 262(1/2/3): 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. KIM Y, PIPES W O. Factors influencing suspended solids concentrations in activated sludge settling tanks [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, 67(1): 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. POPHALI G R, KAUL S N, NANDY T, DEVOTTA S. Development of a novel circular secondary clarifier for improving solids liquid separation in wastewater treatment [J]. Water Environment Research, 2009, 81(2): 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. DAMAYANTI A, UJANG Z, SALIM M R, OLSSON G. The effect of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) on biofouling in a hybrid membrane bioreactor for the treatment of high concentration organic wastewater [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 63(8): 1701–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (GROUP) Co. Ltd. GB 50014 — 2006 Code for design of outdoor wastewater engineering [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006. (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Environmental Remediation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Jun Yang  (杨军), Ding Gao  (高定), Tong-bin Chen  (陈同斌), Mei Lei  (雷梅), Guo-di Zheng  (郑国砥) & Xiao-yong Zhou  (周小勇)

Authors
  1. Jun Yang  (杨军)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ding Gao  (高定)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tong-bin Chen  (陈同斌)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mei Lei  (雷梅)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guo-di Zheng  (郑国砥)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiao-yong Zhou  (周小勇)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ding Gao  (高定).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2012AA06A202) supported by Hi-tech Research and Development Project of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Gao, D., Chen, Tb. et al. Comparison of heavy metal removal efficiencies in four activated sludge processes. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 3788–3794 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2923-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2923-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation