Skip to main content
Log in

Application of PID controller to 2D differential geometric guidance problem

  • Published:
Journal of Control Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the application of the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller to the flight control system (FCS) for two-dimensional (2D) differential geometric (DG) guidance and control problem. In particular, the performance of the designed FCS is investigated. To this end, the commanded angle-of-attack is firstly developed in the time domain using the classical DG formulations. Then, the classical PID controller is introduced to develop a FCS so as to form the 2D DG guidance and control system, and the PID controller parameters are determined by the Ziegler-Nichols method as well as the Routh-Hurwitz stability algorithm to guarantee the convergence of the system error. The results demonstrate that the designed controller yields a fast responding system, and the resulting DG guidance and control system is viable and effective in a realistic missile defense engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. J. Astrom, T. Hagglund. PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning[M]. North Carolina: Research Triangle Park, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. C. Kuo. Automatic Control Systems[M]. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Visioli. Tuning of PID controllers with fuzzy logic[J]. IEE Proc-Control Theory and Applications, 2001, 148(1): 1–8.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. H. Park, S. W. Sung, I. Lee. An enhanced PID control strategy for unstable processes[J]. Automatica, 1998, 34(6): 751–756.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Rogers. Missile guidance comparison[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Providence, Rhode Island, 2004, AIAA 2004–4882.

  6. P. G. Gonsalves, A. K. Caglayan. Fuzzy logic PID controller for missile terminal guidance[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control. New York: IEEE Press, 1995: 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. M. Siouris. Missile Guidance and Control Systems[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. P. Adler. Missile guidance by three-dimensional proportional navigation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1956, 27(5): 500–507.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Y. Kuo, Y. C. Chiou. Geometric analysis of missile guidance command[J]. IEE Proc-Control Theory and Applications, 2000, 147(2): 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. C. Chiou, C. Y. Kuo. Geometric approach to three-dimensional missile guidance problem[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1998, 21(2): 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Y. Kuo, D. Soetanto, Y. C. Chiou. Geometric analysis of flight control command for tactical missile guidance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, 2001, 9(2): 234–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Kreyszig. Differential Geometry[M]. New York: Dover, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Li, W. Jing, H. Wang, et al. Application of 2d differential geometric guidance to tactical missile interception[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE Press, 2006: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Li, W. Jing, H. Wang, et al. Iterative solution to differential geometric guidance problem[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal, 2006, 78(5): 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Ariff, R. Zbikowski, A. Tsourdos, et al. Differential geometric guidance based on the involute of the target’s trajectory[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2005, 28(5): 990–996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. A. White, O. Ariff, R. Zbikowski, et al. Direct intercept guidance using differential geometric concepts[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance and Navigation Control Conference. San Francisco, California, USA, AIAA Paper 2005–5969.

  17. B. Friedland. Control System Design: An Introduction to State Space Methods[M]. New York: Dover, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. W. Nesline, P. Zarchan. A class look at modern control for missile autopilot design[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance and Navigation Control Conference. San Diego, California, 1982: 90–104.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The earlier edition of this paper was presented at 2006 Chinese Control Conferece.

Chaoyong Li received his B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), in 2003. Currently, he is a Ph.D. Candidate of the Department of Aerospace Engineering in HIT. His current field of research is nonlinear control and its applications to missile guidance and control systems. Currently, he is a student member of AIAA and JSASS.

Wuxing Jing received his M.S. degree (1989) and Ph.D. (1994) from HIT. From 2000 to 2001, he was a visiting fellow of the Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow. Currently, he is a Professor at the Department of Aerospace Engineering in HIT. His research interests are spacecraft dynamic and control, nonlinear system control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, C., Jing, W. Application of PID controller to 2D differential geometric guidance problem. J. Control Theory Appl. 5, 285–290 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-006-6109-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-006-6109-9

Keywords

Navigation