Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation

  • Conceptual/Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because extant literature on the service logic of marketing is dominated by a metaphorical view of value co-creation, the roles of both service providers and customers remain analytically unspecified, without a theoretically sound foundation for value creation or co-creation. This article analyzes value creation and co-creation in service by analytically defining the roles of the customer and the firm, as well as the scope, locus, and nature of value and value creation. Value creation refers to customers’ creation of value-in-use; co-creation is a function of interaction. Both the firm’s and the customer’s actions can be categorized by spheres (provider, joint, customer), and their interactions are either direct or indirect, leading to different forms of value creation and co-creation. This conceptualization of value creation spheres extends knowledge about how value-in-use emerges and how value creation can be managed; it also emphasizes the pivotal role of direct interactions for value co-creation opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Because it is a perspective on business and marketing that is not only dominated by service but also based on service, we prefer the term service logic (see Grönroos 2011). Service is the mental model or dominant logic (Prahalad and Bettis 1986) that guides the use of this perspective. The expression “service-dominant logic” confuses service as a perspective and the dominant logic concept. However, when referring to conventional literature on service logic, we use “service-dominant logic” or SDL.

  2. The co-creation concept appears in multiple firm-driven contexts, such as virtual (Füller 2010), learning (Desai 2010), product development, and innovation (Ramaswamy 2011; Rowley et al. 2007) contexts. We can observe a shift in how co-creation has been treated.

  3. Although the experiential value creation process is embedded in the constantly evolving context, expressions such as “value-in-context” (Chandler and Vargo 2011) only describe what influences the way value-in-use emerges or is created. They cannot replace value-in-use as the fundamental concept. Value-in-use is grounded in the view of value as a utility, which emerges for the user during a consumption process (see Becker 1965). Therefore, we use value-in-use as the theoretically best description of a situation in which value emerges for or is created by the customer in a temporally fluctuating, accumulating experience process during use (resource/outcome integration).

  4. Although the expression “accumulated experiences” seems to imply a constantly positively evolving level of value, obviously the value accumulation process may include both positive and negative value experiences, where at times the customer may also become worse off and not constantly better off.

  5. Value is of course also created for the firm. However, in the present analysis we discuss only how value is created for the customer.

References

  • Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Marketing Association (AMA). (2007). October 2007-last update, Definition of Marketing. Available: http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketing.aspx (August 25, 2009).

  • Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(March), 868–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, D. (2004). Dialogue and its role in the development of relationship-specific knowledge. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 19(2), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communicative practice: taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. G. (2003). Establishing meaningful customer relationships: why some companies and brands mean more to their customers. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1991). Marketing services: Competing through quality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brax, S. A., & Jonsson, K. (2009). Developing solution offerings for remote diagnostics. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(5), 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, D. R., Turnbull, P. W., & Wilson, D. T. (2003). Dyadic adaptation in business-to-business markets. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1636–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carú, A., & Cova, B. (2003). Revisiting consumption experience: a more humble but complete view of the concept. Marketing Theory, 3(2), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: how context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Dalli, D., & Zwick, D. (2011). Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1990). Market-driven strategy: Processes for creating value. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, D. A. (2010). Co-creating learning: insights from complexity theory. The Learning Organization, 17(5), 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echeverri, P., & Skålen, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction–a practice theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiglier, P., & Langeard, E. (1975). Une approche nouvelle du marketing des services. Revue Francaise de Gestion, Novembre, 97–113.

  • Eiglier, P., & Langeard, E. (1976). Principe de politique marketing pour les enterprises de service. Working paper. Institut d’Administration des Enterprises, Université d’Aix-Marseille.

  • Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2011). Designing solutions around customer network identity goals. Journal of Marketing, 75(March), 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyrberg, A., & Jüriado, R. (2009). What about interaction? Networks and brands as integrators within a service-dominant logic. Journal of Service Management, 20(4), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. J. (1964). Aristotle and the development of the value theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(1), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Helle, P. (2010). Adopting a service logic in manufacturing. Conceptual foundation and metrics for mutual value creation. Journal of Service Management, 21(5), 564–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Ravald, A. (2011). Service business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (1991). Marketing revisited: the crucial role of the part-time marketer. European Journal of Marketing, 25(2), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2006). Many-to-many marketing as grand theory. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 339–353). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2007). Exit services marketing–enter service marketing. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 6(2), 113–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D. R. (2005). Managing customers as investments. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(Spring), 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. (Ed.). (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., & Blair, E. A. (2006). Consumer preference for product bundles: the role of reduced search costs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 506–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, K., & Strandvik, T. (2009). Monitoring value-in-use of e-service. Journal of Service Management, 20(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson, K.-J., Edvardsson, B., Sundström, E., & Andersson, P. (2010). A customer-dominant logic of service. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 531–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helkkula, A., & Kelleher, C. (2010). Circularity of customer service experience and customer perceived value. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 9(1), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helkkula, A., Kelleher, C., & Pihlström, M. (2012). Characterizing value as an experience: implications for service researchers and managers. Journal of Service Research, 15(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2002). The value-profit chain: Treat employees like customers and customers like employees. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The nature of customer value–An axiology of services in the consumption experience. In R. T. Rust & R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service quality: New directions in theory and practice. Thousand Oak: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Introduction to consumer value. In M. B. Holbrook (Ed.), Customer value. A framework for analysis and research (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. (2006). ROSEPEKICECIVECI versus CCV: The resource-operant, skill-exchanging, performance-experiencing, knowledge-informed, competence-enacting, co-producer-involved, value-emerging, customer-interactive view of marketing versus the concept of customer value: “I can get it for you wholesale.”. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing; dialog, debate and directions (pp. 208–223). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Dixon, G. (1985). Mapping the market for fashion: Complementarity in aggregate patterns of revealed preference. In M. R. Solomon (Ed.), The psychology of fashion (pp. 109–126). Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holttinen, H. (2010). Social practices as units of value creation: theoretical underpinnings and implications. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., & Bornemann, T. (2009). Implementing the marketing concept at employee-customer interface. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A. (1977). Consumer behavior: Application of theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, R. J. (1960). The marketing revolution. Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa, A. S. (2004). Customer value: a review of recent literature and an integrative configuration. Management Decision, 42(5), 645–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkman, O. (2006). Customer value formation in practice. A practice-theoretical approach. Dissertation, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Kowalkowski, C. (2011). Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langeard, E., & Eiglier, P. (1987). Servuction. Le marketing des services. Paris: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, W. D. (1955). The value judgment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, U., & Lehtinen, J. R. (1991). Two approaches to service quality dimension. Service Industries Journal, 11(3), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. H. (1960). The marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, (July–August), 45–56.

  • Levy, S. J. (1964). Symbolism and life style. In S. A. Greyser (Ed.), American marketing association (pp. 140–150). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., & Dubé, L. (2011). Process and outcome interdependency in frontline service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, J. (1991). Better business by the ABC of value. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKitterick, J. B. (1957). What is the marketing management concept? In F. B. Bass (Ed.), The frontier of marketing thought and science (pp. 71–82). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Hope, Q., Eisenstat, R., Nathaniel, N., & Galbraith, J. (2002). The problem of solutions: balancing clients and capabilities. Business Horizons, 45(2), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. (1999). Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Academy of the Management Review, 24(3), 390–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, I. C. L., Nudurupati, S. S., & Tasker, P. (2010). Value co-creation in the delivery of outcome-based contracts for business-to-business service. AIM working paper series, No. 77 (May). Available at: http://www.aimresearch.org/index.php?page=wp-no-77.

  • Nordin, F., & Kowalkowski, C. (2010). Solutions offerings: a critical review and reconceptualisation. Journal of Service Management, 24(4), 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting the bottom of 'triple bottom line'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1988). A theory of the offering: toward a neo-industrial business strategy. In C. C. Snow (Ed.), Strategy, organizion design, and human resource management (pp. 111–128). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation. Harvard Business Review (July-August), 65–77.

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (1993). The one to one future: building relationships one customer at a time. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: work is theater and every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The co-creation of value–Invited commentary. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V. (2011). It’s about human experiences…and beyond, to co-creation. Industrial Marketing Management. 40.

  • Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romilla. (1916). Reklame-laere [Advertising theory]. Trondheim: Private publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J., Kupiec-Teahan, B., & Leeming, E. (2007). Customer community and co-creation: a case study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(2), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (1994). Service quality: insights and managerial implications from the frontier. In R. T. Rust & R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service quality: New directions for theory and practice (pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Zahorik, A. J., & Keiningham, T. L. (1996). Service marketing. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Fernández, R., & Iniesta-Bonilla, Á. M. (2007). The concept of perceived value: a systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory, 7(4), 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Fernández, R., Iniesta-Bonilla, Á. M., & Holbrook, M. B. (2009). The conceptualisation and measurement of consumer value in services. International Journal of Market Research, 51(1), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M. (2006). Going beyond the product, defining, designing, and delivering customer solutions. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialogue, debate, and directions (pp. 365–380). New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C., & Arroniz, I. (2006). The 12 different ways for companies to innovate. Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., & Uslay, C. (2007). Implications of the revised definition of marketing: from exchange to value creation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(2), 302–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shostack, G. L. (1981). How to design a service. In J. H. Donnelly & W. R. George (Eds.), Marketing of services (pp. 221–229). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. R., & Buchanan, B. (1991). A role-theoretic approach to product symbolism: mapping a consumption constellation. Journal of Business Research, 22(March), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbacka, K., Frow, P., Nenonen, S., & Payne, A. (2012). Designing business models for value co-creation. Review of Marketing Research, 9, 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandvik, T., Holmlund, M., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Customer needing: a challenge for the seller offering. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: from product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(July), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermerwe, S. (1996). Becoming a customer “owning” company. Long Range Planning, 29(6), 770–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer integration and value creation: paradigmatic traps and perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: what it is, what it is not, what it might be. In S. L. Vargo & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing; dialog, debate and directions (pp. 43–56). New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). Its all B2B … and beyond: toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Shlesinger, L. A. (2009). Customer experience creation: determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, D., Schott, J. E., & Lamont, L. M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 41(April), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voima, P., Heinonen, K., & Strandvik, T. (2010). Exploring customer value formation–a customer dominant logic perspective. Working paper, No. 552, Publications of Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Voima, P., Heinonen, K ., & Strandvik, T. (2011a). Value in experience–proposing a customer dominant marketing vocabulary. EMAC 40th Conference, 24–27 May, Ljubljana.

  • Voima, P., Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson, K.-J., & Arantola-Hattab, J. (2011b). A customer ecosystem perspective on service, QUIS12, June 2–5. New York: Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, S. (1996). Value creation by company-consumer interaction. Journal of Marketing Management, 12, 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: an attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12.

  • Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive edge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 193–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B., & Flint, D. D. (2006). Marketing’s service-dominant logic and customer value. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: dialog, debate and directions (pp. 183–195). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B., & Gardial, S. F. (1996). Know your customers—new approaches to understanding customer value and satisfaction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perception of price, quality and value: a means-ends-model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1990). Delivering quality service. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CERS Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Hanken School of Economics Finland, P.O. Box 479, 00101, Helsinki, Finland

    Christian Grönroos & Päivi Voima

Authors
  1. Christian Grönroos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Päivi Voima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Grönroos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grönroos, C., Voima, P. Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 41, 133–150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation