Skip to main content
Log in

Protecting relational assets: a pre and post field study of a horizontal business combination

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variety of theoretical frameworks including social exchange theory, relational exchange theory, and contracting theory are used to investigate how to protect relational assets in a marketing channel when an upstream horizontal business combination between key suppliers arises. In this study, we ascertain downstream channel members’ perceptions of a supplier’s horizontal business combination both prior to and after such a combination. Our findings indicate that a normative contract breach resulting from a horizontal business combination influences downstream channel members by reducing their performance, decreasing their satisfaction, and increasing their likelihood of exiting the channel. Consequently, both the relational assets of the upstream supplier and their downstream customers are harmed. Importantly, these influences can be partially offset through the moderating effect of channel identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As evidence of this point, the retailer members of the cooperative under study are free to purchase from any other sources of supply that they wish. The dividends that they receive from the cooperative, however, are directly tied to their purchases from the cooperative.

  2. The contract breaches that we study here are the breaches of contract between the retailer-owner-principals of the cooperative and the management-agents who actually operate the cooperative. The agents’ failure to generate the benefits promised pre-business combination is a breach of the normative principal-agent contract with respect to the combination.

  3. Critics argue contract breach cannot be distinguished from the related constructs of: (1) unmet expectations, (2) inequity, and (3) dissatisfaction (Guest 1998). Expectations are generalized beliefs about what parties can expect from their relationships with each other, while normative contracts pertain to specific beliefs formed by the promises that the parties make to one another (cf. Robinson 1996; Robinson and Rousseau 1994). Turnley and Feldman (2000) empirically demonstrated the discriminant validity of the contract breach and unmet expectations constructs (n.b., Turnley and Feldman (2000) purportedly investigate contract violation. However, their operationalization of that construct is more consistent with our conceptual definition of contract breach). Contract breach and inequity are also closely intertwined (Pate et al. 2003). However, “[w]hereas equity is evaluated by considering ratios of inputs and outcomes, breach of contract is determined by comparing inputs and outcomes relative to what was promised” (Morrison and Robinson 1997, p. 242). Thus, unkept promises distinguish between perceptions of inequity and perceptions of contract breach. Finally, (dis)satisfaction, as we view it here, is a channel member’s affective response to an overall assessment of its relationship with an exchange partner (Geyskens et al. 1999). Turnley and Feldman (2000) have empirically shown contract breach and dissatisfaction to be distinct constructs.

  4. In-role performance is defined as how well an employee performs those activities described in its job description. Extra-role performance (often termed citizenship behaviors) is comprised of those activities an employee performs beyond his/her job description.

  5. Our focus here is upon channel member dependence rather than channel relationship interdependence. We do this because Kim and Hsieh (2003, p. 109) argue that “[d]istributor and supplier dependence must be decoupled and managed separately.”

  6. This second cooperative resulted from a merger of two retail cooperative chains prior to this investigation.

  7. Peter et al. (1993) argue that difference scores should generally be avoided, largely because they “are typically less reliable than other measures” (p. 661). However, Willett (1988, p. 368) counters that, because reliability coefficients of difference measures are often misinterpreted, such measures are not necessarily unreliable. Following Willett’s (1988) recommendation, we create our measure of contract breach from differences between individual items rather than from differences between scales. Because we construe our measure of contract breach as a formative scale, reliability coefficients used to assess reflective measures are not appropriate (Diamantopoulos and Winklhofer 2001).

  8. A good example of this is our propensity to exit (PTE) measure. We began with three items for this measure; however, the purification process indicated that two items should be dropped. Thus, the two items reflecting propensity to exit during the next six months or during the next year were eliminated. Their poor statistical performance can be traced to their conceptual redundancy with the remaining item, propensity to exit during the next two years.

References

  • Achrol, R. S., & Gundlach, G. T. (1999). Legal and social safeguards against opportunism in exchange. Journal of Retailing, 75(Spring), 107–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P., & Stern, L. W. (1985). A sociopsychological explanation for why marketing channel members relinquish control. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(November), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1985). The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis. Marketing Science, 4(Summer), 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1984). A model of distributor’s perspective of distributor-manufacturer working relationships. Journal of Marketing, 48(Fall), 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(Fall), 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Jap, S. D. (2005). The dark side of close relationships. Sloan Management Review, 46(Spring), 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antia, K. D., & Frazier, G. L. (2001). The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships. Journal of Marketing, 65(October), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(January), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(June), 325–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(Spring), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(March), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediatior variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(December), 1173–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekier, M. M., & Shelton, M. J. (2002). Keeping your sales force after the merger. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellou, V. (2007). Psychological contract assessment after a major organizational change. Employee Relations, 29(1), 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67(January, 1), 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: an investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59(October), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R., & Tripp, T. (1996). Beyond distrust: ‘Getting Even’ and the need for revenge. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research (pp. 146–260). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customer’s assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(March), 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Lusch, R. F., & Smith, L. P. (1991). Conflict and satisfaction in an industrial channel of distribution. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 21(6), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Dev, C. S., & Lee, D.-J. (2000). Managing marketing channel opportunism: the efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. Journal of Marketing, 64(April), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchikhi, H., & Kimberly, J. R. (2003). Escaping the identity trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buvik, A., & Reve, T. (2001). Asymmetrical deployment of specific assets and contractual safeguarding in industrial purchasing relationships. Journal of Business Research, 51(February), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J. P., & Perreault W. D. Jr. (1999). Buyer-seller relationships in business markets. Journal of Marketing Research, (November), 339−460.

  • Cannon, J. P., Achrol, R. S., & Gundlach, G. T. (2000). Contracts, norms, and plural form governance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(Spring), 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L., & Hulland, J. (1999). Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: a resource-based view. Journal of Marketing, 63(April), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, V. (2001). Violating psychological contract terms amongst maltese public service employees: occurrence and relationships. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(3), 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Organizational factors in post-acquisition performance. IEEE Transactions and Engineering Management, 37(4), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(September), 459–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. D. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(March), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R., & McLean Parks, J. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 245–256). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(June), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echambadi, R., & Hess, J. D. (2007). Mean-centering does not alleviate collinearity problems in moderated multiple regression models. Marketing Science May, 26(June), 438–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(February), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, A. J., & Jap, S. D. (1999). Manage consolidation in the distribution channel. Sloan Management Review, 41(Fall), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, G. L. (1999). Organizing and managing channels of distribution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(Spring), 226–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(April), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F., & Nevin, J. R. (1985). The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(May), 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, D. I., & Bello, D. C. (2002). Two sides to attitudinal commitment: the effect of calculative and loyalty commitment on enforcement mechanisms in distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(Winter), 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A. (2007). Alliance networks and firm performance: the impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28(May), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. M., Way, C. Y., LeFort, S., Barrett, B. J., & Parfrey, P. S. (2007). Predictors of registered nurses’ organizational commitment and intent to stay. Health Care Management Review, 32(April–June), 119–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., Harvey, M. G., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Social exchange in supply chain relationships: the resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (1998). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J. D., Kumar, N., & Stern, L. W. (2001). Examining the impact of destructive acts in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(February), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: the abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, D. R. (1990). Mergers and acquisitions and managerial commitment to innovation in M-Form firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Bucerius, M. (2005). A marketing perspective on mergers and acquisitions: how marketing integration affects postmerger performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(January), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (2000). A general theory of competition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Nevin, J. R. (1974). Power in a channel of distribution: sources and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(May), 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(April), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The resource-advantage theory of competition: dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of Marketing, 60(October), 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D., & Ganesan, S. (2000). Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(May), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, G., & Weitz, B. A. (1988). Forward integration into distribution: an empirical test of transaction cost analysis. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 4(Fall), 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1982). Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(November), 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasulis, J. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1980). A framework for the use of power. European Journal of Marketing, 14(4), 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, J. E., Jackson, D. W., Jr., & Crosby, L. A. (1990). Effects of alternative types of influence strategies under different channel dependence structures. Journal of Marketing, 54(July), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. K., & Hsieh, P.-H. (2003). Interdependence and its consequences in distributor-supplier relationships: a distributor perspective through response surface approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(February), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingshott, R. P. J., & Pecotich, A. (2007). The impact of psychological contracts on trust and commitment in supplier-distributor relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9/10), 1053–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the “Me” among the “We”? Identity, work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1031–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. C., & Lambert, D. M. (1991). A model of channel member performance, dependence, and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 67(Summer), 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Brown, J. R. (1982). A modified model of power in the marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(August), 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Brown, J. R. (1996). Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 60(October), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: insights for service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D., Jr. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 268–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, T. W., & Staelin, R. (1983). An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Science, 2(Spring), 161–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean Parks, J. (1997). The fourth arm of justice: The art and science of revenge. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & B. Bies (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations (pp. 113–144). Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medcof, J. W. (1990). PEAT: an integrative model of attribution processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 111–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, A. A., & Jehn, K. E. (2003). The dark side of identification: overcoming identification-induced performance impediments. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 5, 189–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. J., & Nevin, J. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(October), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(August), 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, K. S. (1988). Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Science, 7(Autumn), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(January), 226–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Retailing, 57(Fall), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pate, J., Martin, G., & McGoldrick, J. (2003). The impact of psychological contract violation on employee attitudes and behaviour. Employee Relations, 25(6), 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. P., Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(March), 655–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. W. (1981). Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: a methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(November), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A., Jr. (1993). The effects of satisfaction and structural restraints on retailer exiting, voice, loyalty, opportunism, and neglect. Journal of Retailing, 69(Fall), 320–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A., Jr. (1994). Does satisfaction moderate the association between alternative attractiveness and exit intention in a marketing channel? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(Fall), 364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A., Jr. (1999). Unexplored antecedents of exiting in a marketing channel. Journal of Retailing, 75(Summer), 218–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A., Jr. (2003). Antecedents of satisfaction in a marketing channel. Journal of Retailing, 79, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(Winter), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F., & Henske, B. (1991). The only sure method of recouping merger premiums. Journal of Retail Banking, 8(2), 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2006). Effects of psychological contract breach on performance of it employees: the mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(June), 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(October), 30–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robicheaux, R., & El-Ansary, A. (1975). A general model for understanding channel member behavior. Journal of Retailing, 52(Winter), 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(December), 574–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(May), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach violation: a longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(August), 525–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotondi, T., Jr. (1975). Organizational identification: issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(June), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Stow (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 15 (pp. 1–47). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: issues, alternatives, and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., & Barclay, D. W. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(January), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental social psychology, Vol. 21 (pp. 261–302). San Diego: Academic Press Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, V., Murshed, F., & Hulland, J. (2008). Value creation following merger and acquisition announcements: the role of strategic emphasis alignment. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(February), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, Vol. 2 (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, M. V. (2005). A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(Summer), 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human Relations, 52, 895–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2000). Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(February), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(April), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. J., & Pratt, M. D. (2000). Perceptions of banking services in the wake of bank merger: an empirical study. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(2/3), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(March), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to postmerger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 249–264). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 15 (pp. 345–422). Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuyts, S., & Geyskens, I. (2005). The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. Journal of Marketing, 69(October), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C.-M. J., Liao, T.-J., & Lin, Z.-D. (2006). Formal governance mechanisms, relational governance mechanisms, and transaction-specific investments in supplier-manufacturer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(February), 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Yavuz, R. I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2006). How much do you trust me? The dark side of relational trust in new business creation in established companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(July), 541–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(Autumn), 647–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert F. Lusch.

Additional information

All authors contributed equally to this manuscript and research project.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A-1

Table A-1 Questionnaire Items
Figure A-1
figure 4

Demonstration of the nature of the field study: longitudinal survey research in channel setting.

Table A-2 Latent Construct Intercorrelationsa,b,c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lusch, R.F., Brown, J.R. & O’Brien, M. Protecting relational assets: a pre and post field study of a horizontal business combination. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 39, 175–197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0197-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0197-2

Keywords

Navigation