Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative research on high-velocity compaction and conventional rigid die compaction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Materials Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments were carried out with different apparatus to compact electrolytic copper powders at distinct loading speeds. It appears that green densities of compacts prepared by HVC out-number that by conventional compaction by one percent. Compacts by quasi-static compaction are almost as dense as those by HVC under comparable peak pressure. The relationship between green compact density and peak pressure accords with Hang Pei-yun formula well. Spring-backs of HVC compacts are far smaller than those of conventional compaction and quasi-static compaction. HVC compacts are harder than compacts by conventional compaction and quasi-static compaction when they have the same density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hagemeyer J W, Regalbuto J A. Dynamic compaction of metal powders with a high velocity impact device. International Journal of Powder Metallurgy, 1968, 4(3): 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang J-X, Li X-J. Explosive consolidation of powder and its application. Powder Metallurgy Technology, 2004, 24(1): 49–54

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein E M, Orsdel J R V, Schneider P V. High velocity compaction of iron powder. New Horizons for Powder Metallurgy, 1964, 4: 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou S-Y, Yin H-Q, Qu X-H. Research status of high velocity compaction technology in powder metallurgy. Materials Review, 2007, 21(7): 79–81

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chi Y, Guo S-J, Meng F, et al. High velocity compaction in powder metallurgy. Powder Metallurgy Industry, 2005, 15(6): 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shen Y-X, Xiao Z-Y, Wen L-P, et al. Principle, characteristics and status of high velocity compaction technology in powder metal-lurgy. Powder Metallurgy Industry, 2006, 16(3): 19–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Skoglund P, Kejzelman M, Hauer I. High density PM components by high velocity compaction. Proceedings of the 2002 World Congresson Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials. USA: Metal Powder Industries Federation, 2002, 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. Skoglund P. High density PM parts by high velocity compaction. Powder Metallurgy, 2001, 44(3): 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  9. Troive L, Furuberg J, Skoglund P, et al. High density PM components by high velocity compaction, a comparison with conventional compaction. Prague, Czech Republic: Euro PM2005 Congress and Exhibition, 2–5 Oct, 2005

  10. Andersson O. High velocity compaction of soft magnetic compo-sites. PM2TEc2001, New Orleans, USA, 2001

  11. Eriksson M, Haggblad H A, Berggren C. New semi-isostatic high velocity compaction method to prepare titanium dental copings. Powder Metallurgy, 2004, 47(4): 335–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sethi G, Hauck E, German R M. High velocity compaction compared with conventional compaction. Materials Science and Technology, 2006, 22(8): 955–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuan-hui Qu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yi, Mj., Yin, Hq., Wang, Jz. et al. Comparative research on high-velocity compaction and conventional rigid die compaction. Front. Mater. Sci. China 3, 447–451 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-009-0057-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-009-0057-5

Keywords

Navigation