Skip to main content
Log in

Moderating effects of the fit between service tangibilization and organizational performance

  • Empirical Article
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the significance of service industry grows, its relationship to overall economic growth and organizational performance (OP) has also become an issue of prominence. Tangibilization is widely known as one of the means of overcoming the weaknesses of service intangibility and improving OP. This research explores the relationship between service tangibilization and OP. Furthermore, the moderating effect of the fit between service tangibilization and OP will also be discussed in the business context. Specifically, the Korean natural gas industry is selected to test the developed hypotheses. The managers who have experience with managing a service business in either the wholesale or retail sector of this industry were surveyed. The results imply that there exists a significant relationship between service tangibilization and OP, with the mental fit positively strengthening some of the relationships between these two constructs. It can be inferred from this that it is important for companies in the natural gas industry to attain the right fit of mental tangibilization in order to effectively deploy service tangibilization and maximize their OP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apte UM, Mason RO (1995) Global disaggregation of information-intensive services. Manage Sci 41(7):1250–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apte UM, Cavaliere RA, Kulkarni SS (2010) Analysis and improvement of information-intensive services: evidence from insurance claims handling operations. Prod Oper Manag 19(6):665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines TS, Lightfoot HW, Kay JM (2009) The servitization of manufacturing: a review of literature and reflection on future challenges. J Manuf Technol Manag 20(5):547–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry LL (1980) Service marketing is different. Business 30(2):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry LL, Clark T (1986) Four ways to make service more tangible. Business 36(4):53–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielen F, Sempels C (2003) Critical analysis of the dimensionality of the concept of intangibility: an empirical study. In: Acte de l’AMA Servsig Research Conference, Reims

  • Bikfalvi A, Lay G, Maloca S, Waser BR (2013) Servitization and networking: large-scale survey findings on product-related services. Serv Bus 7(1):61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch TM, Upah GD, Zeithaml VA (1985) Services marketing in a changing environment. American Marketing Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J (1990) Development of a taxonomy of service to gain strategic marketing insights. J Acad Mark Sci 18(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang K, Tarn D (2008) Does service tangibilization work in the hotel industry? An experimental investigation. Asia Pac J Tour Res 13(4):411–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase RB (1978) Where does the customer fit in a service operation? Harv Bus Rev 56(6):137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase RB, Apte UM (2007) History of research in service operations: what’s the big idea? J Oper Manag 25(2):375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler BD, Javalgi RG (1993) Analysis of print ad features: service versus products. J Advert Res 33(2):62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgett S, Parkinson S (1993) Marketing for service industries: a review. Serv Ind J 13(3):19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons JA, Fitzsimmons MJ (2011) Service management: operations, strategy, information technology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost FAMK, Kumar M (2000) INTSERVQUAL: an internal adaptation of the GAP model in a large service organization. J Serv Mark 14(5):358–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geum Y, Lee S, Kang D, Park Y (2011) The customisation framework for roadmapping product-service integration. Serv Bus 5(3):213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C (1978) A service-oriented approach to marketing of services. Eur J Mark 12(8):588–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C (1984) A service quality model and its market implications. Eur J Mark 18(4):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ, Carlson L, Dorsch MJ (2002) Addressing services intangibility through integrated marketing communication: an exploratory study. J Serv Mark 16(5):393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JA, Rosenthal R (1991) Testing for moderator variables in meta-analysis: issues and methods. Commun Monogr 58(4):437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry MJ, Schroeder RR (2000) Six Sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Currency Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heesawat C (2005) The opportunities and problems in making services more tangible. Int J Comput Int Manag 13(SP2):201–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyötyläinen M, Moller K (2007) Service packaging: key to successful provisioning of ICT business solutions. J Serv Mark 21(5):304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar US, Apte UM (2007) Operations management in the information economy: information products, processes, and chains. J Oper Manag 25(2):438–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar US, Pitbladdo R (1995) Service markets and competition. J Oper Manag 12(4):397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller KL, Staelin R (1987) Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. J Consum Res 14(9):200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King WR, Tao TSH (2000) Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning. Int J Manag Sci 28(6):667–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1988) Marketing measurement: analysis, planning, and control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche M, Bergeron J, Goutaland C (2001) A three-dimensional scale of intangibility. J Serv Res 4(1):26–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt T (1981) Marketing intangible products and product intangibles. Harv Bus Rev 59(3):94–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock C, Wirtz J (2004) Service marketing: people, technology, strategy. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons R, Chatman J, Joyce C (2007) Innovation in services: corporate culture and investment banking. Calif Manag Rev 50(1):174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDouall J, Snetsinger F (1990) On the intangibility of retailing. J Retail 66(3):211–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DW, Foust JE (2003) Classifying services by tangibility/intangibility of attributes and benefits. Serv Mark Q 24(4):35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal B (2002) Services communications: from mindless tangibilization to meaningful messages. J Serv Mark 16(5):424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. J Mark 49(4):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Park KT (2009) A comparative study on key success factors of six sigma in the manufacturing and service industries: focused on six sigma operations strategy in service industry. J Korean Prod Oper Manag Soc 20(3):45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrakosol B, Lee SM (2013) Information richness on service business websites. Serv Bus 7(2):329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K, Saunders CS (2005) Information processing view of organizations: an exploratory examination of fit in the context of interorganizational relationships. J Manag Inf Syst 22(1):257–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen A (2004) Characteristics of facility service industry and effects on buyer-supplier relationships. Nord J Surv Real Estate Res 2:47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Hernández RM, Martínez-Tur V, Peiró JM, Ramos J (2009) Testing a hierarchical and integrated model of quality in the service sector: functional, relational, and tangible dimensions. Total Qual Manag 20(11):1173–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos J (2002) From intangibility to tangibility on service quality perceptions: a comparison study between consumers and service providers in four service industries. Manag Serv Q 12(5):292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner R (1986) How can service business survive and prosper. Sloan Manag Rev 27(3):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Durand RM, Gur-Arie O (1981) Identification and analysis of moderator variables. J Mark 18:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shostack GL (1977) Breaking free from product marketing. J Mark 41(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestro M, Fitzgerald L, Johnson R, Voss C (1992) Towards a classification of service processed. Int J Serv Ind Manag 3(3):62–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarn D (2005a) Marketing-based tangibilization for services. Serv Ind J 25(6):747–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarn D (2005b) Raising services’ tangibility in foreign markets via marketing: a model construction and a cross-national comparative empirical survey. Int Mark Rev 22(3):327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenhiälä A (2011) Contingency theory of capacity planning: the link between process types and planning methods. J Oper Manag 29(1–2):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D (1978) Strategy is different in service business. Harv Bus Rev 56(4):158–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: towards verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):423–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu YM, Won SH (2009) Service tangibilization approaches to differing service categories: an exploratory study. J Korean Prod Oper Manag Soc 20(4):57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Bitner MJ (1996) Services marketing. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, Berry LL (1985) Problems and strategies in service marketing. J Mark 49(2):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, Berry LL (1988) Quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52(3):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yung-Mok Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khang, J., Yu, YM. & Lee, HH. Moderating effects of the fit between service tangibilization and organizational performance. Serv Bus 8, 239–266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0195-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0195-9

Keywords

Navigation