Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic performance differences across the manufacturing-service continuum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is becoming clear that management theories developed for manufacturing may not be wholly applicable to service firms. Evidence suggests that economic rents tend to occur at the business level in manufacturing, whereas they arise at the corporate level in services. We address this issue in terms of the characteristics of goods and services, and their effects on the drivers of firm performance across the manufacturing-service continuum. We deduce that the effects are non-linear and vary according to whether products are tangible standardized goods, customized goods and services, or standardized intangible services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bear in mind here there are implicit assumptions made by scholars on what constitutes a good or a service.

  2. In the late 1990s, patent law was changed to include business processes, but the number of such patents remains very small compared to utility patents.

  3. This discussion would have fitted equally well under Barriers to Entry, but we elected to include it here because of its implications for efficiency gains and the difficulty service firms have capitalizing on both share and diversification into non-core areas.

  4. Returning to the earlier conceptualization of causal ambiguity where the concepts causal ambiguity and uncertain imitability are held separate (Reed and DeFillippi 1990) overcomes the causal-ambiguity paradox (e.g., Powell et al. 2006; King and Zeithaml 2001) that has arisen through recombination of what competitors and managers do not understand about business inputs and outputs. Causal ambiguity has implications for rent generation, whereas uncertain imitability has greater implications for rent appropriation (as is also evident in the study of Powell et al. 2006 and King and Zeithaml 2001). We stress that we are not commenting on which perspective is more rigorous.

References

  • Akehurst G (2008) What do we really know about services? Serv Bus 2:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini V, Bowman C (2001) Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. J Manag Stud 38:811–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen B (2004) If intellectual property rights is the answer, what is the question? Revisiting the patent controversies. Econ Innov New Technol 13:417–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KR (1971) The concept of corporate strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain JS (1954) Economies of scale, concentration, and the condition of entry in twenty manufacturing industries. Am Econ Rev 44:15–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JG, Dunne PA, Glynn WJ (2000) Self-service and technology. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (2002) Building competitive advantage through people. Sloan Manag Rev 43(2):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML (1986) Some strategy implications of a matrix approach to the classification of marketing goods and services. J Acad Mark Sci 14(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner MJ (2000) The servicescape. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyler M, Coff RW (2003) Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strateg Manag J 24:677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein S (1990) Airline mergers, airport dominance, and market power. Am Econ Rev 80:400–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding W, Staelin R (1990) Environment, market share, and market power. Manag Sci 36:1160–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen DE, Cummings TG (1990) Suppose we took service seriously? In: Bowen DE, Chase RB, Cummings TG et al (eds) Service management effectiveness: balancing strategy, organization and human resources, operations, and marketing. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J, Ford RC (2002) Managing service organizations: does having a “thing” make a difference? J Manag 28:447–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady MK, Bourdeau BL, Heskell J (2005) The importance of brand cues in intangible service industries: an application to investment services. J Serv Mark 19:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush TH, Artz KW (1999) Toward a contingent resource-based theory: the impact of information asymmetry on the value of capabilities in veterinary medicine. Strateg Manag J 20:223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, London (republished in 1994 by University Press, Oxford)

  • Carmeli A, Tishler A (2004) Resources, capabilities, and the performance of industrial firms: a multivariate analysis. Manag Decis Econ 25:299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmen JM, Langeard E (1980) Growth strategies for service firms. Strateg Manag J 1:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney M, Gedajlovich E (1991) Vertical integration in franchise systems: agency theory and resource explanations. Strateg Manag J 12:607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadhouri A, Holbrook MB (2001) The chain effects of brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. J Mark 65(2):81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channon DF (1978) The service industries: strategy, structure and financial performance. The MacMillan Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase RB (1981) The customer contact approach to services: theoretical bases and practical extensions. Oper Res 29:698–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase RB, Hayes RH (1991) Beefing up operations in service firms. Sloan Manag Rev 33(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase RB, Tansik DA (1983) The customer contact model for organization design. Manag Sci 29:1037–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coff RW (1999) When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: the resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ Sci 10:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier DA (1985) Service management: the automation of services. Reston Publishing Company, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook DP, Goh C-H, Chung CH (1999) Service typologies: a state of the art survey. Prod Oper Manag 8:318–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Cool K, Dierickx I, Jemison D (1989) Business strategy, market structure and risk-return relationships: a structural approach. Strateg Manag J 10:507–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Rose T, Greenwood R, Hinings B (2000) History and contingency in international accounting firms. In: Aharoni Y, Nachum L (eds) Globalization of services: some implications for theory and practice. Routledge, London, pp 93–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel JA (1990) Managing relationships with customers: a differentiating philosophy of marketing. In: Bowen DE, Chase RB, Cummings TG et al (eds) Service management effectiveness: balancing strategy, organization and human resources, operations, and marketing. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 299–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel JA, Solomon MR, Surprenant CF, Gutman EG (1985) Service encounters: an overview. In: Czepiel JA, Solomon MR, Surprenant CF (eds) The service encounter: managing employee/customer interaction in the service businesses. Institute of Retail Management, New York University, New York, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse DL (2000) Media reputation as a strategic resource: an integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J Manag 26:1091–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmestri G, Montanari F, Usai A (2005) Reputation and strength of ties in predicting commercial success and artistic merit of independents in the Italian feature film industry. J Manag Stud 42:975–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dranove D, Shanley M (1995) Cost reductions or reputation enhancement as motives for mergers: the logic of multihospital systems. Strateg Manag J 16:55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli MK, Rao CP (1993) Service firms international entry-mode choice: a modified transaction-cost analysis approach. J Mark 57(3):19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey L, Naranayan VK (1989) Linking changes in revealed causal maps and environmental change: an empirical study. J Manag Stud 26:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flipo J-P (1988) On the intangibility of services. Serv Ind J 8:286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh J, Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE (2000) Understanding the customer base of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. J Mark 64(3):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33(3):114–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson K, Schulman D (2000) Impression management in services marketing. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Empson L (2003) The professional partnership: relic or exemplary form of governance? Organ Stud 24:909–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos C (1988) Service quality: the six criteria of good perceived service quality. Rev Bus 9(3):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos C (2000) Service reflections: service marketing comes of age. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse R (2000) Knowledge creation and transfer in global service firms. In: Aharoni Y, Nachum L (eds) Globalization of services: some implications for theory and practice. Routledge, London, pp 217–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ, Fisk RP, John J (2000) Services as theater. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugler K, Siebert R (2004) Market power versus efficiency effects of mergers and research joint ventures: evidence from the semiconductor industry. Working paper 10323, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

  • Hall R (1991) The contribution of intangible resources to business success. J Gen Manag 16(4):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (1993) A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 14:607–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell R, Schlesinger LA (2000) The service profit chain. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan KR (1981) Barriers to entry and competitive strategies. Strateg Manag J 2:395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RB, Wheelwright SC (1979) The dynamics of process-product life cycles. Harv Bus Rev 57(2):127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays JM, Hill AV (1999) The market share impact of service failures. Prod Oper Manag 8:208–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays JM, Hill AV (2006) An extended longitudinal study of the effects of a service guarantee. Prod Oper Manag 15:117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Heskett JL (1990) Rethinking strategy for service management. In: Bowen DE, Chase RB, Cummings TG et al (eds) Service management effectiveness: balancing strategy, organization and human resources, operations, and marketing. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 17–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AV, Collier DA, Froehle CM, Goodale JC, Metters RD, Verma R (2002) Research opportunities in service process design. J Oper Manag 20:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Wang CL (2006) The impact of affect on service quality and satisfaction: the moderation of service contexts. J Serv Mark 20:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MA, Mothersbaugh DL, Beatty SE (2003) The effects of locational convenience on customer repurchase intentions across service types. J Serv Mark 17:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kau A-K, Loh EW-Y (2006) The effects of service recovery on consumer satisfaction: a comparison between complainants and non-complainants. J Serv Mark 20:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King A, Zeithaml CP (2001) Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strateg Manag J 22:75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus PG (1985) Quality epiphenomenon: the conceptual understanding of quality in face-to-face service encounters. In: Czepiel JA, Solomon MR, Surprenant CF (eds) The service encounter: managing employee/customer interaction in the service businesses. Institute of Retail Management, New York University, New York, pp 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y-K, Nam J-H, Park D-H, Lee K-A (2006) What factors influence customer-oriented prosocial behavior of customer-contact employees? J Serv Mark 20:251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman MB (1987) The learning curve, technology barriers to entry, and competitive survival in the chemical processing industries. Strateg Manag J 10:431–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman S, Rumelt RP (1982) Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J Econ 13:418–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr S (2006) Academia dissects the service sector, but is it a science? New York Times, April 18, pp C1–4

  • Lovelock CH (1983) Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights. J Mark 47(3):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney JT (2005) Economic foundations of strategy. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney JT, Pandian RJ (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strateg Manag J 13:363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maister DH (1993) Managing the professional service firm. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Makadok R (1998) Can first-mover and early-mover advantage be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strateg Manag J 19:683–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariuzzo F, Walsh PP, Whelan C (2003) Firm size and market power in carbonated soft drinks. Rev Ind Org 23:283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer KJ, Bowen JT, Moulton MR (2003) A proposed model of the descriptors of service process. J Serv Mark 17:621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullum JR, Harrison W (1985) Interdependence and the service encounter. In: Czepiel JA, Solomon MR, Surprenant CF (eds) The service encounter: managing employee/customer interaction in the service businesses. Institute of Retail Management, New York University, New York, pp 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahan AM, Porter ME (1997) How much does industry matter really? Strateg Manag J 18(Summer):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire JB (1986) Management and research methodology. J Manag 12:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metters R, Vargas VA (2000) A typology of decoupling strategies in mixed services. J Oper Manag 18:663–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metters RD, Frei XF, Vargas VA (1999) Measurement of multiple sites in service firms with data envelopment analysis. Prod Oper Manag 8:264–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills PK (1986) Managing service industries: organizational practices in a postindustrial economy. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills PK, Moberg DJ (1982) Perspectives on the technologies of service operations. Acad Manag Rev 7:727–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills PK, Moberg DJ (1990) Strategic implications of service technologies. In: Bowen DE, Chase RB, Cummings TG et al (eds) Service management effectiveness: balancing strategy, organization and human resources, operations, and marketing. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 97–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills PK, Chase RB, Margulies N (1983) Motivating the client/employee system as a service production strategy. Acad Manag Rev 8:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DJ Jr (1996) Market power and business strategy. Quorum Books, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray JY, Kotabe M (1999) Sourcing strategies of U.S. service companies: a modified transaction-cost analysis. Strateg Manag J 20:791–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar PR (1993a) Performance effects of information asymmetry and economies of scope in diversified service firms. Acad Manag J 36:28–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar PR (1993b) Stock market reactions to related diversified moves by service firms seeking benefits from information asymmetry and economies of scope. Strateg Manag J 14:569–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northcraft GB, Chase RB (1985) Managing service demand at the point of delivery. Acad Manag Rev 10:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson PG, Ward T (2000) Relationship marketing and management. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 317–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 14:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA, Barney JB (2003) Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Manag Decis Econ 24:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick JA, Scherer RF, Brodzinski JD, Quinn JF, Ainina MF (1999) Global leadership skills and reputational capital: intangible resources for sustainable competitive advantage. Acad Manag Exec 13(1):58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Polito T, Watson K (2004) The content continuum: extending the Hayes and Wheelwright process-product diagonal to facilitate improvement of services. J Am Acad Bus 4(1/2):406–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell TC (1996) How much does industry matter? An empirical test. Strateg Manag J 17:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell TC, Lovallo D, Caringal C (2006) Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Acad Manag Rev 31:175–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB, Paquette PC (1990) Service technologies: key factors in manufacturing strategy. In: Bowen DE, Chase RB, Cummings TG et al (eds) Service management effectiveness: balancing strategy, organization and human resources, operations, and marketing. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 64–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathmell JM (1966) What is meant by services. J Mark 30(4):32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed R, DeFillippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 15:88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed R, Lemak DJ (1998) Total quality management and sustainable competitive advantage in service firms. In: Fedor DB, Ghosh S (eds) Advances in the management of organizational quality. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp 121–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicheld FE (1993) Loyalty-based management. Harv Bus Rev 71(2):64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicheld FE, Sasser WE (1990) Zero defections: quality comes to services. Harv Bus Rev 68(5):105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicheld FE, Teal T (1996) The loyalty effect. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt RP (1991) How much does industry matter? Strateg Manag J 12:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton T, Dollinger M (2004) Target reputation and appropriability: picking and deploying resources in acquisitions. J Manag 30:123–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R (1985) Do markets differ much? Am Econ Rev 75(3):341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner RW (1986) How can service businesses survive and prosper. Sloan Manag Rev 27(3):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B, Bowen DE (1985) Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: replication and extension. J Appl Psychol 70:423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shostack GL (1977) Breaking free from product marketing. J Mark 41(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra JJ, McQuitty S (2005) Service providers and customers: social exchange theory and service loyalty. J Serv Mark 19:292–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smitka M (1991) Competitive ties: subcontracting in the Japanese automotive industry. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos YE, Lioukas S (2001) An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strateg Manag J 22:907–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(Winter):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G, Cappetta R, Jensen RJ (2004) When and how trustworthiness matters: knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organ Sci 15:600–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanriverdi H, Venkatraman N (2005) Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strateg Manag J 26:97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DKE (1978) Strategy is different in service businesses. Harv Bus Rev 56(4):158–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations. Am Sociol Rev 61:674–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42:35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan PR, Ramanujam V (1990) The corporate performance conundrum: a synthesis of contemporary views and an extension. J Manag Stud 27:463–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga B (2004) Intangible resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. J Econ Behav Organ 54:205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J (2000) A model of aesthetic value in the servicescape. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, pp 69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarhorik AJ, Rust RT, Keiningham TL (2000) Estimating the return on quality’. In: Swartz TA, Iaobucci D (eds) Handbook of services marketing and management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 223–245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan F. Storrud-Barnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, R., Storrud-Barnes, S.F. Systematic performance differences across the manufacturing-service continuum. Serv Bus 3, 319–339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-009-0073-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-009-0073-7

Keywords

Navigation