Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions

  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract and Key Results

  • Penrose’s legacy is a curious one. Much cited, but little read, her work is recognized as one of the main intellectual foundations for modern resource based theories of business strategy and theories of organizational routines and capabilities.

  • However, Penrose did not aim to contribute to the field of strategy; her goal was to advance understanding of the nature of the firm and its growth. Nevertheless, there are important insights in Penrose’s work that have implications for international business and for strategy.

  • We discuss some of the implications of Penrose’s work as well as its limitations. We also briefly discuss the usefulness of adopting a “Penrosean” capability perspective in multinational enterprise (MNE) strategy analysis.

  • The dynamic capabilities framework puts entrepreneurial management into the theory of multinational enterprise, a task Penrose left untouched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A., Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory, Journal of Political Economy, 58,3, 1950, pp. 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A., Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Comment, American Economic Review, 43,4, 1953, pp. 600–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C./ Ghoshal, S., Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H./ Rosenbloom, R. S., The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11,3, 2002, pp. 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. J., Research Note: How Valuable are Organisational Capabilities?, Strategic Management Journal, 15, Winter Special Issue, 1994, pp. 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R./ March, J.G., A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A./ Gunther, R., Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering, New York: The Free Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., The Contribution of Edith Penrose to International Business Scholarship, Management International Review, 43,1, 2003, pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, N./ Young, S., The Economics of Multinational Enterprise, London: Longman 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M., The Architecture of Organizational Capabilities, Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.

  • Knight, F., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R., Transactions-cost Economics in Real Time, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1,1, 1992, pp. 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R./ Cosgel, M., Frank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm, Economic Inquiry, 31,3, 1993, pp. 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B., Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B., The Mind and Method of the Economist, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G./ Simon, H.A., Organizations, New York: Wiley 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., Principles of Economics, London: McMillan 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R.L., The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. New York: Free Press of Glencoe 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York: Free Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R./ Winter, S.G., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Belknap Press 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E., Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm, American Economic Review, 42,6, 1952, pp. 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E., Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Rejoinder, American Economic Review, 43,4, 1953, pp. 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1959/1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E., The Growth of the Firm: A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company, Business History Review 34,1, 1960, pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, P./ Pitelis, C. N., Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: Life, Contribution and Influence, Contributions to Political Economy, 18,1, 1999, pp. 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C., A Theory of the (Growth of the) Transnational Firm: A Penrosian Perspective, Contributions to Political Economy. 19, 2000, p. 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. N. (ed.), The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. N., Edith Penrose and the Resource-based View of (International) Business Strategy, International Business Review, 13,4, 2004, pp. 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C., A Note on Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959): A Case for Synergy, Organization Science Special Issue, ‘A Behavioral Theory of the Firm? 40 Years and Counting’, Submission 2006.

  • Rugman, A./ Verbeke, A., A Final Word on Edith Penrose, Journal of Management Studies, 41,1, 2004, pp. 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., A Note on the Transnational Solution and the Transaction Cost Theory of Multinational Strategic Management, Journal of International Business Studies, 23,4, 1992, pp.761–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Subsidiary-specific Advantages in Multinational Enterprises, Strategic Management Journal, 22,3, 2001, pp. 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 2002, pp. 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Extending the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise: Internalization and Strategic Management Perspectives, Journal of International Business Studies, 34,2, 2003, pp. 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, 35,1, 2004, pp. 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R., Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, in Lamb, R. B. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R./ Schendel, D./ Teece, D., Introduction, in Rumelt, R./ Schendel, D./ Teece, D. (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Boston: Harvard Business School Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J., The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., Organizations and Markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5,2, 1991, pp. 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A., Strategy and Organizational Evolution, Strategic Management Journal, 14, Winter Special Issue, 1993, pp. 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., The Market for Know-how and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology, The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 458, 1981, pp. 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3,1, 1982, pp. 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Managing Intellectual Capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Reflections on the Hymer Thesis, International Business Review, 15,2, 2006, pp. 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Explicating Dynamic Capabilities, Seminar held at the Judge Business School, Cambridge May 2006.

  • Teece, D./ Pisano, G., The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3,3, 1994, pp. 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D./ Pisano, G./ Shuen, A., Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18,7, 1997, pp. 537–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H., Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth, Journal of Public Economy, 77,4, 1969, pp. 628–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B., A Resource-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5,2, 1984, pp. 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S., Understanding Dynamic Capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 24,10, 2003, pp. 991–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Augier, M., Teece, D.J. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. MANAGE. INT. REV. 47, 175–192 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8

Key Words

Navigation