Abstract
This article provides answers to two often-asked questions: 1) What is culture, learning and technology? and 2) What constitutes research in culture, learning, and technology? In doing so, it presents a typology for research in culture, learning, and technology (CLT) that can be used to organize the CLT research literature and guide future CLT research. The typology highlights the categories of frameworks used in CLT research and makes clear that one of the purposes of all CLT research is to identify methods and processes for ethical and inclusive practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. (2017). How cultural factors influence the use of social constructivist-based pedagogical models of distance learning: Examining Japanese online collaborative behaviors. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 91–108). New York: Routledge.
Ashby, I., & Walker, V. L. (2015). Acculturation into a collaborative online learning environment. In M. Simonson (Ed.), Proceedings of the association of educational communications and technologies conference (pp. 199–205). Indianapolis.
Benson, A., Lawler, C., & Whitworth, A. (2008). Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 456–467.
Benson, A. D., Joseph, R., & Moore, J. L. (Eds.). (2017a). Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice. New York: Routledge.
Benson, A. D., Joseph, R., & Moore, J. L. (2017b). Introduction to culture, learning and technology: Research and practice. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 1–7). New York: Routledge.
Bradshaw, A. C. (2017). Critical pedagogy and educational technology. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 8–27). New York: Routledge.
Chen, Y. & Lin, H. (2016). Cultural identities. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.20.
Chuang, H. H. (2016). Leveraging CRT awareness in creating web-based projects through use of online collaborative learning for pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 857–876.
Collier, M. J., & Thomas, M. (1988). Identity in intercultural communication: An interpretive perspective. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories of intercultural communication, international and intercultural communication annual (Vol. 12, pp. 99–120). Newbury Park: Sage.
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). US: Pearson Education.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (Multicultural education series). New York: Teachers College.
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house”. Administrative Issues Journal, 4(2), 12–26.
Gunawardena, C. N., Wilson, P. L., & Nolla, A. C. (2003). Culture and online education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 753–775). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guo, Z., & Benson, A. D. (2017). Chinese international students’ acceptance of mobile learning. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 180–195). New York: Routledge.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City: Anchor.
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–443.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
Horton, A. M., Byker, E. J., & Heggart, K. (2017). Hip-hop music as a pedagogical tool: Teaching with hip-hop in global contexts. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 58–74). New York: Routledge.
Joseph, R., & Diamond, J. (2017). iDESIGN: Designing and implementing a culturally relevant game-based curriculum. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 151–164). New York: Routledge.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 593–597.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London and New York: Routledge.
Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, O. (2014). Towards the integration of culture into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 36–55.
Reiser, R. A. (2001a). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: a history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64.
Reiser, R. A. (2001b). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: a history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67.
Semali, L. M., & Asino, T. I. (2014). Postliteracy in the digital age: the use of mobile phones to support literacy practices in Namibia and Tanzania. Prospects, 44(1), 81–97.
Spector, J. M., Johnson, T. E., & Young, P. A. (2014). An editorial on research and development in and with educational technology. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 62(1), 1.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally speaking. Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Stommel, J. (2014). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/
Terantino, J. M. (2017). Examining the use of an online cultural module to increase learners' intercultural sensitivity. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 75–90). New York: Routledge.
Thomas, M. K. (2017). Globalization, ironic binaries, and instructional technology: Toward the emergence of a robust critical theory of technology. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 44–57). New York: Routledge.
Thomas, M., Mitchell, M., & Joseph, R. (2002). The third dimension of ADDIE: A cultural embrace. Tech Trends, 46, 40–45.
UNESCO (2002). UNESCO Universal Declaration on cultural diversity. Cultural diversity series #1. Paris: UNESCO.
Wong, G. K. (2016). The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 313–338.
Woodley, X. M., Mucundanyi, G., & Lockard, M. (2017a). Designing counter-narratives: Constructing culturally responsive curriculum online. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 7(1), 43–56.
Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J., & Negash, B. (2017b). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. TechTrends, 61(5), 470–478.
Yan, S., Mum, Y., Engerman, J. A., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2017). Boys and video game play: Re-engaging boys in the classroom. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 165–179). New York: Routledge.
Young, P. A. (2008). The culture based model: Constructing a model of culture. Journal of Educational, Technology & Society, 11(2), 107–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and Animal Studies
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
Author Angela D. Benson declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benson, A.D. A Typology for Conducting Research in Culture, Learning and Technology. TechTrends 62, 329–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0267-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0267-8