Skip to main content
Log in

A Typology for Conducting Research in Culture, Learning and Technology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides answers to two often-asked questions: 1) What is culture, learning and technology? and 2) What constitutes research in culture, learning, and technology? In doing so, it presents a typology for research in culture, learning, and technology (CLT) that can be used to organize the CLT research literature and guide future CLT research. The typology highlights the categories of frameworks used in CLT research and makes clear that one of the purposes of all CLT research is to identify methods and processes for ethical and inclusive practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. (2017). How cultural factors influence the use of social constructivist-based pedagogical models of distance learning: Examining Japanese online collaborative behaviors. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 91–108). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, I., & Walker, V. L. (2015). Acculturation into a collaborative online learning environment. In M. Simonson (Ed.), Proceedings of the association of educational communications and technologies conference (pp. 199–205). Indianapolis.

  • Benson, A., Lawler, C., & Whitworth, A. (2008). Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 456–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, A. D., Joseph, R., & Moore, J. L. (Eds.). (2017a). Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, A. D., Joseph, R., & Moore, J. L. (2017b). Introduction to culture, learning and technology: Research and practice. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 1–7). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A. C. (2017). Critical pedagogy and educational technology. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 8–27). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. & Lin, H. (2016). Cultural identities. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.20.

  • Chuang, H. H. (2016). Leveraging CRT awareness in creating web-based projects through use of online collaborative learning for pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 857–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, M. J., & Thomas, M. (1988). Identity in intercultural communication: An interpretive perspective. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories of intercultural communication, international and intercultural communication annual (Vol. 12, pp. 99–120). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). US: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (Multicultural education series). New York: Teachers College.

  • Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house”. Administrative Issues Journal, 4(2), 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Wilson, P. L., & Nolla, A. C. (2003). Culture and online education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 753–775). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., & Benson, A. D. (2017). Chinese international students’ acceptance of mobile learning. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 180–195). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.

  • Horton, A. M., Byker, E. J., & Heggart, K. (2017). Hip-hop music as a pedagogical tool: Teaching with hip-hop in global contexts. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 58–74). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R., & Diamond, J. (2017). iDESIGN: Designing and implementing a culturally relevant game-based curriculum. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 151–164). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 593–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, O. (2014). Towards the integration of culture into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 36–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (2001a). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: a history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (2001b). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: a history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semali, L. M., & Asino, T. I. (2014). Postliteracy in the digital age: the use of mobile phones to support literacy practices in Namibia and Tanzania. Prospects, 44(1), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Johnson, T. E., & Young, P. A. (2014). An editorial on research and development in and with educational technology. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 62(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally speaking. Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stommel, J. (2014). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/

  • Terantino, J. M. (2017). Examining the use of an online cultural module to increase learners' intercultural sensitivity. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 75–90). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. K. (2017). Globalization, ironic binaries, and instructional technology: Toward the emergence of a robust critical theory of technology. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 44–57). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Mitchell, M., & Joseph, R. (2002). The third dimension of ADDIE: A cultural embrace. Tech Trends, 46, 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2002). UNESCO Universal Declaration on cultural diversity. Cultural diversity series #1. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Wong, G. K. (2016). The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, X. M., Mucundanyi, G., & Lockard, M. (2017a). Designing counter-narratives: Constructing culturally responsive curriculum online. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 7(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J., & Negash, B. (2017b). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. TechTrends, 61(5), 470–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, S., Mum, Y., Engerman, J. A., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2017). Boys and video game play: Re-engaging boys in the classroom. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning and technology: Research and practice (pp. 165–179). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. A. (2008). The culture based model: Constructing a model of culture. Journal of Educational, Technology & Society, 11(2), 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela D. Benson.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Studies

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

Author Angela D. Benson declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benson, A.D. A Typology for Conducting Research in Culture, Learning and Technology. TechTrends 62, 329–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0267-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0267-8

Keywords

Navigation