Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A History of Blast Exposure May Affect the Transmission Properties of Cranial Bone

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An individual who has sustained mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) due to impact is more susceptible to a second concussion for a time, presumably due to the vulnerability of the injured brain tissue. This knowledge informed military guidelines regarding return to duty following blast-related TBI (bTBI). However, bone mechanics studies have shown that bone experiences hysteresis above certain strains as a result of microdamage, which suggests that blast exposure may also reduce the ability of the cranium itself to protect the brain from another blast. In the present study, the response of deer skull bone to blast wave exposure was measured. Oxy-acetylene driven laboratory scale shock tubes were used to produce realistic blast loading profiles. When a skull was exposed to peak blast pressures of about 600 kPa (measured with the sensor facing the direction of propagation of the blast wave) from a 41 mm diameter shock tube, the peak transmitted pressure gradually increased from 13.1 % to 40.2 % over five trials. This hysteresis was persistent and repeatable but was not observed with more localized loading. Future work could more specifically quantify blast thresholds at which persistent changes could be expected. Results from such work would further inform clinical decisions regarding return to activity following bTBI. The present results show that blast loading history of cranial bone should be understood and controlled in the design of related experiments. The results also underscore the need for accurate material properties and experimental validation of numerical models of the interaction of blast waves with the cranium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zemper ED (2003) A two-year prospective study of relative risk of a second cerebral concussion. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82:653–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Slobounov S, Slobounov E, Sebastianelli W, Cheng C, Newell K (2007) Differential rate of recovery in athletes after first and second concussion episodes. Neurosurgery 61:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCrea M, Pliskin N, Barth J et al (2008) Official position of the military TBI task force on the role of neuropsychology and rehabilitation psychology in the evaluation, management and research of military veterans with traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol 22:10–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L, Yang K, King A (2004) A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng 126:226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lockhart PA (2010) Primary blast injury of the head: numerical prediction and evaluation of protection. M.S. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  6. Cernak I (2005) Penetrating and blast injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 23:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  7. Courtney A, Courtney M (2009) A thoracic mechanism of mild traumatic brain injury due to blast pressure waves. Med Hypotheses 7:276–283

    Google Scholar 

  8. Courtney M, Courtney A (2011) Working toward exposure thresholds for blast-induced traumatic brain injury: thoracic and acceleration mechanisms. NeuroImage 54:S55–S61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koliatsos VE, Cernak I, Xu L et al (2011) A mouse model of blast injury to brain: initial pathological, neuropathological and behavioral changes. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70(5):399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. An YH, Draughn RA (2000) Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. CRC Press, p 33

  11. Laugier P (2011) Bone quantitative ultrasound. Springer, pp 382, 396, 402

  12. Jepsen K, Davy D (1997) Comparison of damage accumulation measures in human cortical bone. J Biomech 30(9):891–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pattin CA, Caler WE, Carter DR (1994) Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J Biomech 29(1):69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Courtney AC, Hayes WC, Gibson LJ (1996) Age-related differences in post-yield damage in human cortical bone: experiment and model. J Biomech 29(11):1463–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Courtney MW, Courtney AC (2011) Attenuation of a blast wave through cranial bone. Proc of the 26th meeting of the International Ballistics Society (IBS), Miami, Florida, September 12-16, 2011. Presentation # 11991

  16. Moss WC, King MJ, Blackman EG (2009) Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. Phys Rev Lett 103:108702–108709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolander R, Mathie B, Bir C, Ritzel D, VandeVord P (2011) Skull flexure as a contributing factor in the mechanism of injury in the rat when exposed to a shock wave. Ann Biomed Eng 39(10):2550–2559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Courtney AC, Andrusiv LP, Courtney MW (2012) Oxy-acetylene driven laboratory scale shock tubes for studying blast wave effects. Rev Sci Instrum 83:045111-1–045111-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Courtney MW, Courtney AC (2010) A table-top blast driven shock tube. Rev Sci Instrum 81:126103-1–126103-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowen LG, Fletcher ER, Richmond DR (1968) Estimate of man’s tolerance to the direct effects of air blast. Defense Atomic Support Agency #2113 AD693105

  21. Needham CE (2010) Blast waves. Springer, pp 12–15

  22. Thompson HJ, Lifshitz J, Marklund N et al (2005) Lateral fluid percussion model of brain injury: a 15-year review and evaluation. J Neurotrauma 22:42–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Toth Z, Hollrigel G, Gorcs T, Soltesz I (1997) Instantaneous perturbation of dentate interneuronal networks by a pressure wave transient delivered to the neocortex. J Neurosci 17:8106–8117

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garman RH, Jenkins LW, Switzer RC III et al (2011) Blast exposure in rats with body shielding is characterized primarily by diffuse axonal injury. J Neurotrauma 28:947–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chavko M, Koller WA, Prusaczyk WK, McCarron RM (2007) Measurement of blast wave by a miniature fiber optic pressure transducer in the rat brain. J Neurosci Methods 159:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chavko M, Watanabe T, Adeeb S, Lankasky J, Ahlers ST, McCarron RM (2011) Relationship between orientation to a blast and pressure wave propagation inside the rat brain. J Neurosci Methods 195:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bir C (2011) Measuring blast-related intracranial pressure within the human head. Final Report. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Award Number W81XWH-09-1-0498

  28. Hoberecht RW (2009) A finite volume approach to modeling injury mechanisms of blast-induced traumatic brain injury. M.S. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

  29. Moore DF, Jerusalem A, Nyein M, Noels L, Jaffee MS, Radovitsky RA (2009) Computational biology—modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system. NeuroImage 47:T10–T20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor PA, Ford CC (2009) Simulation of blast-induced early-time intracranial wave physics leading to traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng 131:061007-1–061007-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L (2009) Computational modeling of a causal mechanism of blast wave induced brain injury—a potential tool for injury prevention. Annual report for USAMRMC Award Number W81XWH-08-1-0678, OMB No. 0704-0188

  32. McElhaney JH, Fogle JL, Melvin JW, Haynes RR, Roberts VL, Alemi NM (1970) Mechanical properties of cranial bone. J Biomech 3:495–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cowin S (ed) (2001) Bone mechanics handbook. Informa HealthCare

  34. Peterson J, Dechow PC (2002) Material properties of the inner and outer cortical tables of the human parietal bone. Anat Rec 268:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Motherway JA, Verschueren P, Van der Perre G, Vander Sloten J, Gilchrist MD (2009) The mechanical properties of cranial bone: the effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position. J Biomech 42:2129–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alley M (2009) Explosive blast loading experiments for TBI scenarios: characterization and mitigation. MSME Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. UMI Microform 1470126 distributed by ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor

  37. Romba JJ, Martin P, Dorsey W (1961) The propagation of air shock waves on a biophysical model. Technical Memorandum 17-61, AD264932, U.S. Army Ordnance Human Engineering Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by BTG Research, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Courtney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Courtney, A., Berg, A., Michalke, G. et al. A History of Blast Exposure May Affect the Transmission Properties of Cranial Bone. Exp Mech 53, 319–325 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9643-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9643-z

Keywords

Navigation