Skip to main content
Log in

Regularized Partial and/or Constrained Redundancy Analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods of incorporating a ridge type of regularization into partial redundancy analysis (PRA), constrained redundancy analysis (CRA), and partial and constrained redundancy analysis (PCRA) were discussed. The usefulness of ridge estimation in reducing mean square error (MSE) has been recognized in multiple regression analysis for some time, especially when predictor variables are nearly collinear, and the ordinary least squares estimator is poorly determined. The ridge estimation method was extended to PRA, CRA, and PCRA, where the reduced rank ridge estimates of regression coefficients were obtained by minimizing the ridge least squares criterion. It was shown that in all cases they could be obtained in closed form for a fixed value of ridge parameter. An optimal value of the ridge parameter is found by G-fold cross validation. Illustrative examples were given to demonstrate the usefulness of the method in practical data analysis situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S.E., Coffey, B.S., & Byerly, R. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.W. (1951). Estimating linear restrictions on regression coefficients for multivariate normal distributions. Annals of Statistics, 22, 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L., & Friedman, J.H. (1997). Predicting multivariate responses in multiple linear regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 59, 3–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilli, V.M., & Elswick, R.K. (1985). A mixture of the MANOVA and GMANOVA models. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 14, 3075–3089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambra, L., & Lauro, N. (1989). Non symmetrical analysis of three-way contingency tables. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Lee, C. (1994). Work-family conflict: A comparison by gender, family type, and perceived control. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, K.E., & Kennard, R.W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groß, J. (2003). Linear regression. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Z.V., Wildt, A.R., & Durand, R.M. (1988). Redundancy analysis: An alternative to canonical correlation and multivariate multiple regression in exploring interset associations. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 282–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology, 2nd English edn. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel, G.C., & Velu, R.P. (1998). Multivariate reduced-rank regression: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, P.R. (1996). Transitions in the psychological contract: Some evidence from the banking sector. Human Resource Management Journal, 6, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & Hwang, H. (2002). Generalized constrained canonical correlation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & Hwang, H. (2006). Regularized multiple correspondence analysis. In J. Blasius & M.J. Greenacre (Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 259–279). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & Hwang, H. (2007). Regularized linear and kernel redundancy analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & Shibayama, T. (1991). Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables. Psychometrika, 56, 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & Yanai, H. (2008). On ridge operators. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 428, 1778–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, J.M.F. (1993). Least squares optimization in multivariate analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C.J.F., & Šmilauer, P. (1998). CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows. Ithaka: Microcomputer Power.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58, 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Wollenberg, A.L. (1977). Redundancy analysis: Alternative for canonical analysis. Psychometrika, 42, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velu, R.P. (1991). Reduced rank models with two sets of regressors. Applied Statistics, 40, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, M., Ekici, A., Lu, Z., & Monteiro, R. (2007). Dimension reduction and coefficient estimation in multivariate linear regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 69, 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshio Takane.

Additional information

We thank Jim Ramsay for his insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The work reported in this paper is supported by Grants 10630 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takane, Y., Jung, S. Regularized Partial and/or Constrained Redundancy Analysis. Psychometrika 73, 671–690 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9067-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9067-y

Keywords

Navigation