Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

NSMTSEP: Neighbor Supported Modified Threshold Sensitive Stable Election Protocol for WSN

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The way by which we select a cluster head critically affects the overall futuristic structure in the network. Cluster head wastes more energy for long distance transmission in the network. Sometimes, due to incomplete information of neighbor nodes, a proper cluster head is not selected and deplete energy quickly. This paper, presents a clustering protocol (NSMTSEP) based on neighbor support. Support of the neighbor node is used to calculate the threshold. Neighbor nodes are labeled based on dynamically changing parameters. The total energetic value of different nodes, cluster heads degree, the summative information of distances of member nodes, etc. is dynamically changing parameters. The label of a node is used to calculate the weight of that particular node. Weight is finally used to formulate equations for threshold calculation. The fundamental target is to increase the stable time, throughput, and network lifespan by reducing the cost incurred in intra-cluster communication. Neighbor supported labeled method is suitable for increasing longevity in the network. NSMTSEP upgrades stability by 8.6%, 36.9% as compared to enhanced threshold sensitive stable election protocol (ETSSEP) and threshold sensitive stable election protocol (TSEP). NSMTSEP is three times more stable than stable election protocol (SEP) and low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy protocol (LEACH). Improvement in the lifespan of NSMTSEP is recorded by 11.98%, 3.43% and 24.9% over ETSSEP, TSEP, and LEACH respectively whereas more than twice in comparison with SEP. The throughput enhanced by 32.2% and 55.7% respectively over TSEP and LEACH, twice over SEP and ETSSEP respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyinbode, O., Le, H., & Takizawa, M. (2010). A survey on clustering algorithmsfor wireless sensor networks. Journal of Space-Based Situated Computing, 01(02), 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qing, Li., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(12), 2230–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baronti, P., Pillai, P., Chook, V. W. C., Chessa, S., Gotta, A., & Hu, Y. F. (2007). Wireless sensor networks: A survey on the state of the art and the 802.154 and ZigBee standards. Computer Communications, 30(7), 1655–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharjee, D., Kumar, S., Kumar, A., & Choudhury, S. (2010). Design and Development of Wireless Sensor Node. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 02(07), 2431–2438.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Akkaya, K., & Younis, M. (2005). A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor Networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3, 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbasi, A., & Younis, M. (2007). A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 30(14), 2826–2841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38, 399–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhuo, Y., Fang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Securing wireless sensor networks: A survey. Communication Surveys Tutorials, 10, 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., & Ghosal, D. (2008). Wireless sensor network survey. Journal of Computer Networks, 52(12), 2292–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamsan Saleh, A. M., Ali, B. M., Rasid, M. F. A., & Ismail, A. (2014). A survey on energy awareness mechanisms in routing protocols for wireless sensor networks using optimization methods. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 25(12), 1184–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen, H., & Bai, G. (2016). Routing in wireless multimedia sensor networks: A survey and challenges ahead. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 71, 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhen, H., Li, Y., & Zhang, G. J. (2013). Effcient and dynamic clustering scheme for heterogeneous multi-level wireless sensor networks. Acta Automatica Sinica, 39(4), 454–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arora, V. K., Sharma, V., & Sachdeva, M. (2016). A survey on LEACH and other’s routing protocols in wireless sensor network. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 127(16), 6590–6600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, H., Ye, F., Cheng, J., Lu, S., & Zhang, L. (2005). Ttdd: Two-tier data dissemination in large-scale wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 11(1–2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, L., Sharma, V., & Singh, A. (2017). Feasibility and modeling for convergence of optical-wireless network-a review. AEU International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 80, 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sen, F., Bing, Q., & Liangrui, T. (2011). An improved energy-effcient pegasis-based protocol in wireless sensor networks. In 2011 Eighth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD) (pp. 2230–2233).

  18. Alyaoui, N., Kachouri, A., Zaatouri, I., & Guilouf, A. B. (2017). A comparative study of the energy effcient clustering protocols in heterogeneous and homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(4), 6453–6468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ettus, M. (1998). System capacity, latency, and power consumption in multihop-routed ss-cdma wireless networks. In Radio and wireless conference, 1998. RAWCON 98 (pp. 55–58).

  20. Randhawa, S., & Jain, S. (2017). Data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Previous research, current status and future directions. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(3), 3355–3425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., and Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference (pp. 4–7).

  22. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., & Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Second international workshop on sensor and actor network protocols and applications. (pp. 1–11). Boston: Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Islam, M. M., and Matin, T. K. (2012). Extended stable election protocol (SEP) for three-level hierarchical clustered heterogeneous WSN. In IET conference on wireless sensor systems (pp. 1–4).

  25. Manjeshwar, A., & Agarwal, D. P. (2001). TEEN: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In 1st international workshop on parallel and distributed computing issues in wireless networks and mobile computing (pp. 2009–2015).

  26. Kashaf, A., Javaid, N., Khan, Z. A., & Khan, I. A. (2012). TSEP: Threshold-sensitive stable election protocol for WSNs. In 10th international conference on frontiers of information technology (pp. 17–19).

  27. Kumar, S., Verma, S. K., & Kumar, A. (2015). ETSSEP: Enhanced threshold sensitive stable election protocol. Wireless Personal Communication, 85, 2643–2656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, India

    Pankaj Kumar Mishra

  2. CSE Department, G.B.P.E.C., Pauri, India

    Shashi Kant Verma

  3. CSE Deprtment, K.N.I.T., Sultanpur, Ratan Pur, India

    Awadhesh Kumar

Authors
  1. Pankaj Kumar Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shashi Kant Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Awadhesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Kumar Mishra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, P.K., Verma, S.K. & Kumar, A. NSMTSEP: Neighbor Supported Modified Threshold Sensitive Stable Election Protocol for WSN. Wireless Pers Commun 119, 2975–2990 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08381-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08381-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation