Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

National systems of entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on entrepreneurship is mainly focused on the individual, and research on innovation has been mainly focused on institutions even though we know that both agency and context matter. To better integrate the two approaches, Acs et al. (Research Policy 43:476–494, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016) introduced the national systems of entrepreneurship (NSE) as a framework for a resource allocation system driven by individual-level opportunity pursuit through the creation of new ventures and its outcomes regulated by country-specific institutional characteristics. This paper draws on the NSE framework, sets it in a larger context, examines the logic of the approach and introduces the special issue by summarizing the papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is important to understand how national systems of entrepreneurship (NSE) fit in the broader ecosystem literature, as well as trying to understand exactly what the concept means. The concept of NSE (Acs et al. 2014, 479) introduced entrepreneurship into Nelson’s national systems of innovation (NSI). The concept of NSE is new and this special issue will explore its applications to the broader subject. However, Acs et al. (2014) use the concept of NSE interchangeable with the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems (Autio and Levie 2015, p. 1). Both NSE and entrepreneurial ecosystems are about institutions, agency and place, and the policy issue emerges as to the “strategic management of place” (Audretsch 2015) or what Acs et al. (2014) call the system. What is the strategic management of place if not the management of entrepreneurial ecosystems? Small business economics has another special issue forthcoming (Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, edited by O’connor, Stam, Acs & Audretsch) that will further explore this topic.

  2. Acs, Audretsch, Brauenhelm and Carlsson in 2004–2005 produce a set of working papers published by CEPR, the Royal Institute of Technology and the Max Planck Institute of Economics.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2012). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 213–245. doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757–774. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2016). National system of innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43, 476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2015). National systems of Entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs, E. Autio, & L. Szerb (Eds.), Global entrepreneurship and development index 2014. Springer briefs in economics, chapter 2 (pp. 13–26). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14932-5_2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2015). The strategic management of place. In D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, & M. L. Walshok (Eds.), The oxford handbook of local competitiveness (pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Caiazza, R. (2015). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: Cross-national analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer,. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9441-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Kuratko, D. F., & Link, A. N. (2015a). Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 703–712. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9663-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2016). The seven secrets of Germany. Economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Paleari, S. (2015b). Academic policy and entrepreneurship: A European perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 363–368. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9359-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenny, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43, 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2015). Management of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Mimeo: Imperial college Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., Litan, R., & Shramm, C. (2009). Good capitalism bad capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship and economic growth: A historical review. Industry and Corporate Change, 18, 1193–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreira, C., & Teixeira, P. (2015). Entry and exit in severe recessions: Lessons from the 2008–2013 Portuguese economic crisis. Small Business Economics (in this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9703-3.

  • Cowling, M. (2016). You can lead a firm to R&D but can you make it innovate? UK evidence from SMEs. Small Business Economics (in this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9704-y.

  • Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches—Their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations (pp. 1–35). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9588-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2015). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Technology Transfer,. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9440-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyden, D. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small Business Economics (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9706-0.

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). Smart specialization, entrepreneurship and SMEs: Issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy. Small Business Economics (in this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9707-z.

  • Minola, T., Criaco, G., & Obschonka, M. (2015). Age, culture, and self-employment motivation. Small Business Economics,. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9685-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peroni, C., & Rillo, S. (2016). Entrepreneurship and immigration: Evidence from GEM Luxembourg. Small Business Economics (in this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9708-y.

  • Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2004). The modern firm. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillo, S., & Persault, J. (2016). Entrepreneurial readiness in the context of national systems of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics (in this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9709-x.

  • Schumpeter, J. (1911/1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vismara, S. (2016). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics (in this issue). doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik E. Lehmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Lehmann, E.E. et al. National systems of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 46, 527–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9705-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9705-1

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation