Skip to main content
Log in

Students’ Attitudes Toward Chemistry Lessons: The Interaction Effect between Grade Level and Gender

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the interaction effect between grade level and gender with respect to students' attitudes toward chemistry lessons taught in secondary schools. The sample consisted of 954 chemistry students in grades Secondary 4–7 (approximately 16–19 years of age) in Hong Kong. Students' attitudes were surveyed using an attitude toward chemistry lessons scale (ATCLS), and subscale scores were produced on four dimensions: liking for chemistry theory lessons; liking for chemistry laboratory work; evaluative beliefs about school chemistry; and behavioral tendencies to learn chemistry. When the ATCLS data were subjected to two-way MANOVA, the interaction effect between grade level and gender on students' attitudes toward chemistry lessons was statistically significant. The interaction effect was attributable to scores on the theory lessons subscale and laboratory work subscale. Male students in Secondary 4 and 5 liked chemistry theory lessons more than their female counterparts. However, male students' liking for chemistry laboratory work declined when they progressed from Secondary 4 to Secondary 7; no such a significant decline in attitude toward chemistry laboratory work was found in females. Overall, both males and females were just marginally positive about chemistry lessons during the years of secondary schooling. Implications of these findings for curriculum design are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adesoji, F. A., & Raimi, S. M. (2004). Effects of enhanced laboratory instructional technique on senior secondary students' attitude toward chemistry in Oyo Township, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. R. (1979). Attitudes toward mathematics and science in Iranian middle schools. School Science and Mathematics, 79(3), 229–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexakos, K., & Antoine, W. (2003). The gender gap in science education: Strategies to encourage female participation in science. Science Teacher, 70(3), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, G., McInerney, D. M., & Marsh, H. W. (2005). Exploring sex differences in science enrolment intentions: An application of the general model of academic choice. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., Rollnick, M., Green, G., & White, M. (2001). The development and use of an instrument to assess students' attitude to the study of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 833–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., & Welch, I. D. (1972). The third force: Humanistic psychology and science education. Science Teacher, 39, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D. (2006). Inquiry-based laboratory work in chemistry: Teacher's guide. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong (http://www3.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/chemistry/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D. (2007). Developing an instrument to measure students' attitudes toward chemistry lessons for use in curriculum evaluation.Paper presented at the 38th annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Fremantle, Australia.

  • Cheung, D. (2008). Facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (2000). Science teachers’ beliefs about curriculum design. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, A. (2007). Gender inclusivity in secondary chemistry: A study of male and female participation in secondary school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 711–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S., & Chung, G. (1999). Motivation, anxiety, enjoyment and values associated with chemistry learning among form 5 Bruneian students.Paper presented at the MERA-ERA joint conference, Malacca, Malaysia.

  • Doherty, J., & Dawe, J. (1985). The relationship between development maturity and attitude to school science: An exploratory study. Educational Studies, 11(2), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, (pp. 269–322)4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2005). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.) The handbook of attitudes (pp. 743–767). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks, L. P., Middlecamp, C. H., Pienta, N. J., Heltzel, C. E., & Weaver, G. C. (2006). Chemistry in context: Applying chemistry to society (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L. L. (1967). Manifest science interest of pupils in forms 3 and 4. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 13(3), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, M. J., & Shotts, P. (1987). What do they think of chemistry? Education in Chemistry, 24(4), 108–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education, 81, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, T. J., & Stables, A. (1986). Gender differences in attitudes to science for third year pupils: An argument for single-sex teaching groups in mixed schools. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4(2), 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havard, N. (1996). Student attitudes to studying A-level sciences. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Ben-Zvi, R., & Samuel, D. (1976). The measurement of the interest in, and attitudes to, laboratory work amongst Israeli high school chemistry students. Science Education, 60(3), 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Ben-Zvi, R., Samuel, D., & Tamir, P. (1977). Attitudes of Israeli high-school students toward chemistry and physics: A comparative study. Science Education, 61(2), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. (2000). Salters’ curriculum projects and gender inclusivity in science. School Science Review, 81(296), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (1987). Gender differences in science: Parallels in interest, experience and performance. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 467–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachigan, S. K. (1991). Multivariate statistical analysis: A conceptual introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Radius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542–557). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. (1988). The customer is always right: Girls’ and boys’ reactions to science lessons. School Science Review, 69(249), 662–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. (2007). A gender inclusive approach to science education. In D. Sadker, & E. Silber (Eds.) Gender in the classroom: Foundations, skills, methods, and strategies across the curriculum (pp. 205–223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.) The handbook of attitudes (pp. 21–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Q. C., Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Student perceptions of chemistry laboratory learning environments, student-teacher interactions and attitudes in secondary school gifted education classes in Singapore. Research in Science Education, 35, 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. O. (1996). “I’m just not interested”: Gender-related responses in a high school chemistry curriculum.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.

  • Lister, T. (2005). Kitchen chemistry. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menis, J. (1983). Attitudes towards chemistry as compared with those towards mathematics, among tenth grade pupils (aged 15) in high level secondary schools in Israel. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1(2), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menis, J. (1989). Attitudes towards school, chemistry and science among upper secondary chemistry students in the United States. Research in Science & Technological Education, 7(2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. (1998). Reflections on being female in school science: Toward a praxis of teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., & Cleary, T. A. (1993). Direction of wording effects in balanced scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls and physics: Continuing barriers to ‘belonging’. The Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2005). Attitudes and opinions (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, L., & Barnes, J. (1982). The relationship between cooperative, competitive and individualized learning preferences and students’ perceptions of classroom learning atmosphere. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 182–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou, C., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2004). Major influences on attitudes toward science. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. H., & Rennie, L. J. (2002). Teachers’ implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 881–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Harding, J. (1995). Gender equity. In B. J. Fraser, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.) Improving science education (pp. 186–210). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilotte, W. J., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, J. M. (1998). Mission impossible?: Can anything be done about attitudes to science? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Parker, L. H. (1987). Scale dimensionality and population heterogeneity: Potential problems in the interpretation of attitude data. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(6), 567–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rop, C. (1997). Breaking the gender barrier in the physical sciences. Educational Leadership, 55(4), 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rop, C. J. (1999). Student perspectives on success in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female friendly science: Applying women’s studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, F. J. (1972). A humanistic approach to science teaching. NASSP Bulletin, 56, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88, 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schibeci, R. A. (1982). Measuring student attitudes: Semantic differential or Likert instruments? Science Education, 66(4), 565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(4), 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, A. G., Sleet, R. J., & Stern, W. (1982). School students’ attitudes to science subjects. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 28(1), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69(4), 511–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spall, K., Dickson, D., & Boyes, E. (2004). Development of school students’ constructions of biology and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 787–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A. (1990). Differences between pupils from mixed and single-sex schools in their enjoyment of school subjects and in their attitudes to science and to school. Educational Review, 42(3), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A., & Wikeley, F. (1997). Changes in preference for and perceptions of relative importance of subjects during a period of educational reform. Educational Studies, 23(3), 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Gray, D. (1999). Gender preferences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkamp, M. W., & Maehr, M. L. (1984). Gender differences in motivational orientations toward achievement in school science: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. D., Dini, M. L., & Li, E. (1994). Decreasing course content improves student comprehension of science and attitudes towards science in freshman biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 679–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P., Arzi, A., & Zloto, D. (1974). Attitudes of Israeli high school students towards physics. Science Education, 58(1), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of lecture, teacher demonstrations, discussion and practical work on 10th graders’ attitudes to chemistry and understanding of electrolysis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, M., & Younger, M. (2000). The other side of the gender gap. Gender and Education, 12(4), 493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, (in press).

  • Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2004). Evaluation of an attributional retraining (modeling technique) to reduce gender differences in chemistry instruction. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, D. Students’ Attitudes Toward Chemistry Lessons: The Interaction Effect between Grade Level and Gender. Res Sci Educ 39, 75–91 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4

Keywords

Navigation