Abstract
The current study examined students’ perceptions of the effects of different forms of instructional feedback on their performance, motivation, and emotion. Forty-nine students attending an eastern US university participated in focus group discussions. The groups explored students’ reactions to grades, praise, and computer versus instructor provided feedback, as well as students’ views of the ideal feedback. Students named detailed comments as the most important and useful form of feedback. Grades were deemed to be unnecessary if the goal of an activity was to learn. Students proposed that low grades elicit negative affect and damage the students’ sense of self-efficacy, and high grades decrease motivation and lessen students’ perceived need to improve. Praise was reported to positively affect emotion, but not to be directly conducive to learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Airasian, P. W. (1994). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.
Baumeister, R. F., Hutton, D. G., & Cairns, K. J. (1990). Negative effects of praise on skilled performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 131–148.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–68.
Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.
Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210–216.
Cameron, J., & Pierce, D. P. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363–423.
Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: what does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 12–19.
Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the Subscription-processing industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 50–64.
Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162–173.
Ferdig, R. E., & Mishra, P. (2004). Emotional responses to computers: experiences in unfairness, anger and spite. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypertext, 13, 143–161.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.
Guskey, T., & Bailey, J. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Thousand Oaks: Crown.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–113.
Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: a review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 774–795.
Kanouse, D. E., Gumpert, P., & Canavan-Gumpert, D. (1981). The semantics of praise. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 97–115). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
Lajoie, S., & Derry, S. (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.
Landauer, T. K., Latham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in Education, 10.
Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., & Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 75–106). Hillsdale: Earlbaum.
Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J., & Gingras, I. (1999). Understanding the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation-uses and abuses of meta-analysis: comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 669–676.
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008). The effects of differential feedback on students’ performance. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Marzano, R. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum and Development.
Mishra, P. (2006). Affective feedback from computers and its effect on perceived ability and affect: a test of the computers as social actors hypothesis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 107–131.
Mishra, P., Nicholson, M., & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2001). Does my wordprocessor have a personality? Topffer’s law and educational technology. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 634–641.
Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669–678.
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1093–1110.
Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 441–456.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Schute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedback. Princeton: Educational Testing Service. RR-07-11.
Shanab, M. E., Peterson, D., Dargahi, S., & Deroian, P. (1981). The effects of positive and negative verbal feedback on the intrinsic motivation of male and female subjects. Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 195–205.
Shute, V. J. (2007). Tensions, trends, tools, and technologies: Time for an educational sea change. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.
Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2005). They don’t give us our marks’: the role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education Principles Policy & Practice, 12, 21–38.
Tolli, A. P., & Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 692–701.
Torrance, H. (1993). Formative assessment: Some theoretical problems and empirical questions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 23.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lipnevich, A.A., Smith, J.K. “I really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educ Asse Eval Acc 21, 347–367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2