Skip to main content
Log in

Controlling Bivariate Categorical Processes using Scan Rules

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a methodology for efficiently monitoring a health process that classify the intervention outcome, in two dependent characteristics, as “absolutely successful”, “with minor but acceptable complications” and “unsuccessful due to severe complications”. The monitoring procedure is based on appropriate 2-dimensional scan rules. The run length distribution is acquired by studying the waiting time distribution for the first occurrence of a 2-dimensional scan in a bivariate sequence of trinomial trials. The waiting time distribution is derived through a Markov chain embedding technique. The proposed procedure is applied on two simulated cases while it is tested against a competing method showing an excellent performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antzoulakos DL, Rakitzis AC (2010) Runs rules schemes for monitoring process variability. J Appl Stat 37(7):1231–1247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Koutras MV (2009) Runs and Scans with Applications. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Bersimis S, Koutras MV (2009) Run and frequency quota rules in process monitoring and acceptance sampling. J Qual Technol 41(1):66–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti S, Eryilmaz S (2007) A nonparametric shewhart-type signed-rank control chart based on runs. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, vol 36

  • Champ CW, Woodall WH (1987) Exact results for shewhart control charts with supplementary runs rules. Technometrics 29(4):393–399

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ (1994) Interim monitoring of bivariate responses using repeated confidence intervals. Control Clin Trials 15(3):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ (1996) Coupled error spending functions for bivariate sequential tests. Biometrics 52(2):442–450

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ, Farewell VT (1995) Guidelines for monitoring efficacy and toxicity in clinical trials. Biometrics 50(4):1146–1152

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AFB, de Magalhães MS, Epprecht EK (2009) Mnitoring the process mean and variance using a synthetic control chart with two-stage testing. Int J Prod Res 18:5067–5086

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Leval MR, François K, Bull C, Brawn W, Spiegelhalter D (1994) Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures. application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107(3):914–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson T, Karjagin J, Vipp L, Padar M, Parik AH, Starkopf L, Kern H, Tammik O, Starkopf J (2014) Postoperative complications and mortality after major gastrointestinal surgery. Medicina 50(2):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutras MV, Bersimis S, Maravelakis PE (2006) Improving the performance of the chi-square control chart via runs rules. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 8(3):409–426

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koutras MV, Bersimis S, Maravelakis PE (2007) Statistical process control using shewhart control charts with supplementary runs rules. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 9(2):207–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koutras MV, Maravelakis PE, Bersimis S (2008) Techniques for controlling bivariate grouped observations. J Multivar Anal 99(7):1474–1480

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Tsung F, Zou C (2014) Multivariate binomial/multinomial control chart. IIE Trans 46(5):526–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maleki MR, Amiri A (2015) Simultaneous monitoring of multivariate-attribute process mean and variability using artificial neural networks. J Quality Eng Prod Optim 1(1):43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rakitzis AC, Antzoulakos DL (2011) Chi-square control charts with runs rules. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 13(4):657–669

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. Br Med J 331(7529):1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz R, Egger S, Platzer A (2011) Poor, good enough or even better? bridging the gap between acceptability and qoe of mobile broadband data services. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 1–6, Kyoto

  • Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT (1999) Monitoring paired binary surgical outcomes using cumulative sum charts. Stat Med 18(1):69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story DA (2013) Postoperative complications in australia and new zealand (the reason study). Perio Med 2:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topalidou E, Psarakis S (2009) Review of multinomial and multi-attribute quality control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(7):773–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall WH (1997) Control charting based on attribute data: Bibliography and review. J Qual Technol 29(2):172–183

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sotirios Bersimis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bersimis, S., Sachlas, A. & Castagliola, P. Controlling Bivariate Categorical Processes using Scan Rules. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 19, 1135–1149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9508-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9508-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation