Skip to main content
Log in

To be or not to be different: Exploration of norms and benefits of color differentiation in the marketplace

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building a strong brand identity is central for increasing brand equity. As a result, oftentimes, brands develop differentiation strategies in order to stand out from competitors. Yet, is value always gained through differentiation, or is it possible that some value could be forfeited by straying too far from established product category associations? This research examines color norms within product categories and addresses the question of whether visual differentiation is always helpful. With data for 281 top brands, the authors calculate product category color homogeneity scores for 15 product categories and 40 subcategories to empirically explore color norms. Then, these calculations are used in conjunction with brand equity scores to examine the relationship between color differentiation and brand performance. The results show that while color differentiation is helpful for some product categories, it can also be harmful for others. Specifically, the investigation reveals that adhering to color norms may be beneficial for product categories containing a dominant market leader, especially high-involvement categories. The results of this research highlight the existence of visual product category norms, and emphasize both the benefits and risks of visual differentiation should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abril, P. S., Olazábal, A. M., & Cava, A. (2009). Marketing and the law. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 375–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, P. A., & Doyle, J. R. (2006). The interactive effects of colors and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness. Marketing Theory, 6(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. (1997). Brand name effects on interproduct similarity judgments. Marketing Letters, 8(4), 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandweek (2009). Superbrands 2009 report. Brandweek. http://www.brandweek.com/bw/superbrands/. Accessed 14 July 2009.

  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, A. E. (1993). The two-dimensional impact of color on shopping. Marketing Letters, 4(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P., & Ginter, J. L. (1987). Market segmentation, product differentiation, and marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis B (2010). New Gap logo ignites firestorm. CNN Money http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/08/news/companies/gap_logo/index.htm. Accessed 3 Mar 2011.

  • Garber, L. L., Jr., Burke, R. R., & Jones, J. M. (2000). The role of package color in consumer purchase consideration and choice. Marketing Science Working Paper Report, 104, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorn, G. J., Chattopadhyay, A., Yi, T., & Dahl, D. W. (1997). Effects of color as an executional cue in advertising: they’re in the shade. Management Science, 43(10), 1387–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorn, G. J., Chattopadhyay, A., Sengupta, J., & Tripathi, S. (2004). Waiting for the web: how screen color affects time perception. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, J., & Gendall, P. (2010). Colors, brands, and trademarks: the problem of establishing distinctiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(3), 316–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. (2001). The psychological foundations of trademark law: secondary meaning, genericism, fame, confusion and dilution. Trademark Reporter, 91, 1013–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahney L (2003). Apple doin’ the logo-motion. Wired magazine. http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2003/09/60597. Accessed 3 Mar 2009.

  • Kamins, M., Alpert, F., & Perner, L. (2007). How do consumers know which brand is the market leader or was the market pioneer? Consumers’ inferential processes, confidence, and accuracy. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(-8), 591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R. (2003). Creating meaningful brands: the relationship between brand name and brand mark. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, L. I., & Milne, G. R. (2012). Exciting red and competent blue: the importance of color in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: influencing choice without altering brand preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(December), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design. Journal of Marketing, 72(May), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G., & Moon, J. (2002). Positioning for achieving brand association: a psychological categorization framework. Journal of Business Research, 55(4), 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pwc.com (2010). PwC introduces new branding initiative. PwC news releases. http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/press-room/2010/PwC-Introduces-New-Branding-Initiative.jhtml. Accessed 23 Feb 2010.

  • Schmitt, B., & Simonson, A. (1997). Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, identity, and image. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinapuelas, I. C., & Robinson, W. T. (2009). Entry for supermarket feature me-too brands: an empirical explanation of incidence and timing. Marketing Letters, 20(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, M., & Bettman, J. R. (1989). Effects Of brand positioning strategies on consumers’ brand and category perceptions: some insights from schema research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 454–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. L., Hulland, J. S., & Weinberg, B. D. (1993). Premarket forecasting for new consumer durable goods: modeling categorization, elimination, and consideration phenomena. Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lans, R., Pieters, R., & Wedel, M. (2008). Competitive brand salience. Marketing Science, 27(5), 922–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2010). Strategies for distinctive brands. Journal of Brand Management, 17(8), 548–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren I. Labrecque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Labrecque, L.I., Milne, G.R. To be or not to be different: Exploration of norms and benefits of color differentiation in the marketplace. Mark Lett 24, 165–176 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9210-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9210-5

Keywords

Navigation