Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oh, won’t you stay? Predictors of faculty intent to leave a public research university

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding and predicting faculty intent to leave is important to the development of improved conceptual frameworks of faculty success as well as the implementation of effective retention strategies for academic leaders and institutions that invest considerable resources in recruitment, institutional support, and compensation. This study examined the relationship between various research-based factors and faculty intent to leave by integrating components identified in the extant literature for employee turnover more generally and faculty intent to leave more specifically. The results of binary logistic regression models identified workplace stress, being in a “soft-pure” discipline, fewer years of service at the university, and higher research productivity as key predictors of faculty having considered leaving for another institution. Key predictors for faculty having considered leaving academe altogether were being in a “hard-applied” discipline, not having a spouse or partner, a perceived lack of support, a perceived lack of fit, stress of raising a family, and dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the “faculty job”. The implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, L. L. B., Agago, M. O., & Coombs, W. T. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beehr, T. A., Jex, S. M., Stacy, B. A., & Murray, M. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blix, A. G., Cruise, R. J., Mitchell, B. M., & Blix, G. G. (1994). Occupational stress among university teachers. Educational Research, 36(2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluedorn, A. C. (1982). The theories of turnover: Causes, effects, and meaning. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 75–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 396–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. The Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J. P., Wakefield, D. S., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 847–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. R. (2004). Turnover intent in an urban community college: Strategies for faculty retention. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(7), 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. R., & Daly, C. J. (2006). Greener pastures: Faculty turnover intent in urban public universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 776–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delta Project on Postsecondary Costs, Productivity and Accountability. (2009). Trends in college spending: Where does the money come from? Where does it go? Washington, DC: Jane V. Wellman. Retreived from http://www.deltacostproject.org/resources/pdf/trends_in_spending-report.pdf.

  • Dey, E. (1994). Dimensions of faculty stress: A recent survey. Review of Higher Education, 17(3), 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 607–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R., Kasper, H., & Rees, D. (1990). Faculty turnover at American colleges and universities: Analyses of AAUP data. Economics of Education Review, 10(2), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W., Wilke, P., & Lovrich, N. (1986). Dimensions of stress among university faculty. Research in Higher Education, 24, 266–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education, 37(5), 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. (2000). What contributes to job satisfaction among faculty and staff. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105.

  • Harrington, C. F., & Hunt, B. J. (2007). Aligning faculty performance expectations with institutional vision. Paper presented at Institutional Management in Higher Education Conference, Cambridge, MA.

  • Johnsrud, L. (2002). Measuring the quality of faculty and administrative work life: Implications for college and university campuses. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave: A multi-level explanation. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layzell, D. T. (1996). Faculty workload and productivity: Recurrent issues with new imperatives. Review of Higher Education, 19(3), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1975). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matier, M. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences and control. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. G., Hitchcock, M. A., & Teherani, A. (2000). Faculty satisfaction in academic medicine. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. (1993). Work satisfaction and stress in the first and third year of academic appointment. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(4), 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D., Maple, S., & Stage, F. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, S., & Alutto, J. A. (1981). An examination of the organizational antecedents of stressors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, S., & Alutto, J. A. (1984). Sources and outcomes of stress in organizational settings: Toward the development of a structural model. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. L. (1977). The Study of Turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J. (2005). Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J., & Townsend, B. K. (2006). Determining public two-year faculty’s intent to leave: An empirical model. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 124–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A., I. I. I. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., Anderson, J. L., & Lovrich, N. P. (1995). The multiple sources of workplace stress among land-grant university faculty. Research in Higher Education, 36(3), 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C., & Dey, E. (1998). Pushed to the margins: Sources of stress for African-American college and university faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen, E. J. (1996). Stress in academe: What bothers professors? Higher Education, 31(4), 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R. K., & Conley, V. C. (2005). Progress for women in academe, but inequities persist: Evidence from NSOPF:99. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wergin, J. F. (ed.). (1994). Analyzing faculty workload. New Directions for Institutional Research, 83.

  • Witt, S., & Lovrich, N. (1988). Sources of stress among faculty: Gender differences. Review of Higher Education, 11(3), 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. X. (2008). Faculty turnover: Discipline-specific attention is warranted. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 40–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus non-tenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Institutional Research, University of Vermont, 440 College Street, Room 202, Burlington, VT, USA

    John F. Ryan

  2. Office of Institutional Research and Planning, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Richard Healy & Jason Sullivan

Authors
  1. John F. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Healy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, J.F., Healy, R. & Sullivan, J. Oh, won’t you stay? Predictors of faculty intent to leave a public research university. High Educ 63, 421–437 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9448-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9448-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation