Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Working in Imbalance: How Employees Revise Their Psychological Contracts in a Post-Breach Environment

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the post-violation model of the psychological contract, employees who have experienced violation engage in a variety of coping strategies and, more often than not, form a new psychological contract and continue to work for their employer. Our study applies this theoretical model to actual employees’ descriptions of how they deal with psychological contract violation and develop new psychological contracts. We collected interview data from 27 employees at a large manufacturing organization in which dramatic, irreversible company-wide change not only violated employees’ psychological contracts but also provided few obvious opportunities to repair them. Through template analysis of interview transcripts, we chronicle employees’ coping processes, inventory their new psychological contracts, and assess the quality of their employment relationships. We found that some employees effected extensive changes to their psychological contracts, some engaged in an unexpectedly long process of adjustment, and some compromised their self-interest to uphold their pre-violation psychological contracts. Our findings generally map to the post-violation model, but with important refinements that accentuate employees’ role in recreating their psychological contracts, the durability of their psychological contracts, and the role of the psychological contract as a coping mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankins, S. (2015). A process perspective on psychological contract change: Making sense of, and repairing, psychological contract breach and violation through employee coping actions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 1071–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., & Tang, R. L. (2008). When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1104–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12, 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. and Clausen, T. (2016). Verizon to close Henrietta call center; 600 jobs lost. Democrat & Chronicle, October 12. Available at: http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2016/10/12/verizon-call-center-henrietta-closing-january-600-jobs/91963150/ (accessed 16 march, 2017).

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2009). Fifty years of psychological contract research: What do we know and what are the main challenges? In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 71–130). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Parzefall, M. (2008). Psychological contracts. In C. L. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior, 1 (pp. 17–34). London, UK: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, I. (2010). Drawing from a bottomless well? Exploring the resilience of value-based psychological contracts in voluntary organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(5), 699–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giambusso, D. (2016). Unions announce Verizon strike, assailing ‘shameful demands’. Politico, 11 April. Available at: http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2016/04/unions-announce-verizon-strike-assailing-shameful-demands-000000 (accessed 16 march, 2017).

  • Guerro, S., & Naulleau, M. (2016). What’s next after psychological contract violation? Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 71(4), 639–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses of decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, A. J., & Moore, S. Y. (2017). Ideological currency in the psychological contracts of corporate manufacturing employees. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 29(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., Mandl, H. J., & Solley, C. M. (1962). Men, management and mental health. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Diefendorff, J. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Hall, R. J. (2009). Self-regulation at work. The Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClean, J. E., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, C. (2016). Verizon, unions agree to pay raises, net jobs to end strike. Reuters, 20 may. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-verizon-strike-deal-idUSKCN0YL1E7, (accessed 16 march, 2017).

  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, V., & Ickovies, J. (1995). Resilience and thriving in response to challenge: An opportunity for a paradigm shift in women’s health. Women’s Health, 1(2), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parzefall, M.-R., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M. (2011). Making sense of psychological contract breach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(1), 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, A. (2016). The inside story of how the Verizon strike ended. Fortune, June 14. Available at: http://fortune.com/2016/06/14/inside-story-verizon-strike/, (accessed 16 march, 2017).

  • Restubog, S. L., Zagenczyk, T. J., Bordia, P., Bordia, S., & Chapman, G. J. (2015). If you wrong us, shall we not revenge? Moderating roles of self-control and perceived aggressive work culture in predicting responses to psychological contract breach. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1132–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. (1997). The origins and early development of the psychological contract construct. Journal of Management History, 3(2), 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2011). The individual-organization relationship: The psychological contract. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 191–220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Batt, R. (2007). Global competition’s perfect storm: Why business and labor cannot solve their problems alone. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, R., & Freese, C. (1997). New facets of commitment in response to organizational change: Research trends and the Dutch experience. In Cooper, C. L. and. Rousseau D.M, Trends in organizational behavior, (pp. 107-124), New York: Wiley.

  • Schalk, R., & Roe, R. (2007). Towards a dynamic model of the psychological contract. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 37(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1965, 1970, 1980). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

  • Seeck, H., & Parzefall, M.-R. (2008). Employee agency: Challenges and opportunities for psychological contract theory. Personnel Review, 37(5), 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, O. N., Hofmans, J., Bal, P. M., & Jansen, P. G. W. (2016). Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 494–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28, 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomprou, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Hansen, S. D. (2015). The psychological contracts of violation victims: A post-violation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., Pepermans, R., Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., & Jergers, M. (2014). Effects of ideological and relational psychological contract breach and fulfillment on volunteers’ work effort. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., Michon, R., Chebat, J.-C., Tremblay, M., & Fils, J.-F. (2007). An examination of the role of perceived support and employee commitment in employee–customer encounters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1177–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, T., & Wainwright, D. (2008). Issues and challenges in the use of template analysis: Two comparative case studies from the field. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withey, M. J., & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exits, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Administration Science Quarterly, 34, 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Leadership, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA, USA

    Alan J. Krause

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA, USA

    Sarah Y. Moore

Authors
  1. Alan J. Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Y. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan J. Krause.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by either of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krause, A.J., Moore, S.Y. Working in Imbalance: How Employees Revise Their Psychological Contracts in a Post-Breach Environment. Employ Respons Rights J 30, 253–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-018-9321-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-018-9321-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation