Abstract
Previous research on employee psychological contracts has focused on three different types of expectations that workers have of their employers: transactional exchange of economic currency, relational exchange of socioemotional currency, and, more recently, covenantal exchange of ideological currency. This last type of currency, however, has been studied almost entirely in nonprofit workplaces among employees in helping professions (e.g., healthcare, education) who hold advanced degrees. Although not explicit in the extant literature, the implication of such is that expressions of ideological currency may be limited to certain types of professions. In the present study, we therefore analyzed both white and blue-collar employees’ ideological expectations in a corporate, for-profit, manufacturing environment. Using 1492 responses to an open-ended question received from an email survey, we found that 36% contained an expression of ideological currency, with an additional 44.8% possessing a possible expression of ideological currency. Comparisons of these expressions reveal many similarities between white and blue-collar employees within this organization as well as between these employees and those found in the published literature from workers in other industries. We discuss the implications of these findings for theory and future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood Ill: The Dorsey Press, Inc..
Bal, M., & Vink, R. (2011). Ideological currency in psychological contracts: the role of team relationships in a reciprocity perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2794–2817.
Bingham, J. B. (2005). Multiple obligations: Distinguishing the dimensionality and confirming the role of ideology within the psychological contract framework (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
Bingham, J. B., Mitchell, B. W., Bishop, D. G., & Allen, N. J. (2013). Working for a higher purpose: a theoretical framework for commitment to organization-sponsored causes. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 174–189.
Bingham, J. B., Oldroy, J. B., Thompson, J. A., Bednar, J. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2014). Status and the true believer: the impact of psychological contracts on social status attributions of friendship and influence. Organization Science, 25, 73–92.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bunderson, S. (2001). How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professional employees: doctors’ responses to perceived breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 717–741.
Cavanaugh, M., & Noe, R. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of relational components of the new psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 323–340.
Cheves, J. (2015). Three Kentucky county clerks refuse to issue marriage licenses; protest help in Rowan County. The Lexington herald leader, retrieved from http://www.kentucky.com.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Liptak, A. (2015). Supreme Court says Kentucky clerk must let gay couples marry. The New York Times, retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.
MacNeil, I. (1985). Relational contract: what we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985, 483–525.
Morrison, E., & Robinson, S. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.
O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2007). Let’s be professional about this: ideology and the psychological contracts of registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 15, 547–555.
O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009a). The psychological contracts of Australian hospital volunteer workers. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 14(2), 1–11.
O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009b). The role of ethical values in an expanded psychological contract. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 251–263.
O’Donohue, W., Donohue, R., & Grimmer, M. (2007a). Research into the psychological contract. Human Resource Development International, 10(3), 301–318.
O’Donohue, W., Sheehan, C., Hecker, R., & Holland, P. (2007b). The psychological contract of knowledge workers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 73–82.
Obergefell vs. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015).
Rao, K., & Pennington, J. (2013). Should the third reminder be sent? The role of survey response timing on web survey results. The Market Research Society, 55, 651–674.
Roehling, M. (1997). The origins and early development of the psychological contract construct. Journal of Management History, 3(2), 204–217.
Rousseau, D. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 1989.
Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rousseau, D., & McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 1–43.
Rousseau, D., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1994). Linking strategy and human resource practices: how employee and customer contracts are created. Human Resource Management, 33, 463–489.
Thompson, J., & Bunderson, S. (2003). Violations of principle: ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 571–586.
Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., Pepermans, R., Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., & Jegers, M. (2014). Effects of ideological and relational psychological contract breach and fulfillment on volunteers’ work effort. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 217–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by either of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krause, A.J., Moore, S.Y. Ideological Currency in the Psychological Contracts of Corporate Manufacturing Employees. Employ Respons Rights J 29, 15–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-017-9289-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-017-9289-1