Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Empirical Assessment of Alternative Conceptualizations of the Psychological Contract Construct: Meaningful Differences or “Much to do about Nothing”?

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reported study helps move the literature beyond conceptual arguments that have been made and repeated in the literature by investigating the equivalence of three psychological contract (PC) measures that were based on alternative conceptualizations of the PC construct. Employees from a wide range of organizations (n = 1054) were randomly assigned to complete either an expectation, obligation, or promise based measure of their PCs. The equivalence of the PC measures was assessed by comparing factor structures across the three forms, and examining the observed pattern of correlations between the PC measures and external criteria (e.g., trust, equity sensitivity, work centrality, education level). The results indicate that while the three PC measures evoke the same general mental framework in the minds of respondents, and behave similarly for some purposes, depending on the specific relationships being investigated, the measures may yield significantly different results (i.e., they are not fully interchangeable). Implications for theorizing and future research regarding the PC construct are discussed. Also reported is new evidence linking individual differences (e.g., work centrality, equity sensitivity) to perceived responsibilities and rights in the employment relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL1 PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S. (2001). How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professionals: doctors responses to perceived breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 717–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis of for the behavior sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Neuman, J. H. (2004). The psychological contract and individual differences: The role of exchange and creditor ideologies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 150–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCuyer, N., & DeWitte, H. (2006). The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well being, and behavioural reports: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Psychology, 79, 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. J., & Athos, J. (1976). Interpersonal relations and communications. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (1998). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elron, E. (1994). Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattrup, K., Schmitt, N., & Landis, R. (1992). Equivalence of construct measures by job-specific and commercially available aptitude tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1992). Social cognition as a s social science: How social action creates meaning. In D. Ruble, P. Costanzo, & M. Oliveri (Eds.), The social psychology of mental health. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, V. T., & Levesque, L. L. (2005). With a little help from my friends (and substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organizational Science, 16(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C., Rousseau, D. M., & Lee, C. (2004). Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Journal, 12(2), 222–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irving, P. G., & Meyer, J. P. (1994). Reexamination of the met-expectations hypothesis: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 937–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Work alienation: An integrative approach. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. E. (2000). White-collar reactions to job insecurity and the role of the psychological contract: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 39(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King Jr, W. C., Miles, E. W., & Day, D. D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(4), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1973). The psychological contract: Managing the joining up process. California Management Review, 15, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S. W., Kickul, J. R., & Bergmann, T. J. (2007). Managing employee perceptions of the psychological contract over time: the role of employer social accounts and contract fulfillment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., & Solley, C. M. (1962). Men, management,and mental health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, C. D., & Peterson, M. F. (1994). The meaning of working in U.S. and Japanese government at three hierarchical levels. Human Relations, 47(12), 1459–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. (1985). Relational contract: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, 483–525.

  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N., & Johns, (1985). The absence culture and the psychological contract—Who’s in control of absence. Academy of Management Review, 10, 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 224–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. F., & Smith, P. B. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: a 21-nation study. Academy of Management, 38(2), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portwood, J. D., & Miller, E. L. (1976). Evaluating the psychological contract: Its implications for employee satisfaction and work behavior. Proceedings of the Annual Academy of Management, 109–113.

  • Rahim, M., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: first-order factor model and its invariance across groups. (1995). Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, C. M., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work related measures in an equivalent manner. Journal of Management, 20(3), 643–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. (1997). The origins and early development of the “psychological contract” construct. Journal of Management History, 3, 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. (2004). Legal theory: Contemporary contract law perspectives and insights for employment relationship theory. In J. A.-M. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, M. S. Taylor, & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 65–92). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & McLean Parks (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In B. Staw, & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 15, 1–43). Greenwich CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1965, 1980). Organizational psychology. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M. (2002). Psychological contracts: Definitions and distinctiveness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Denver.

  • Shore, L. M., & Barksdale, K. (1998). Examining the degree and level of obligation in the employment relationship: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. (1995). Human resource management’s role in clarifying the new psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measure of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago: McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, P. R. (1996). Transitions in the psychological contract: Some evidence from the banking sector. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(4), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, G., & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Integrating expectations, experiences, and psychological contract violations: A longitudinal study of new professionals. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 77, 493–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). Aren’t there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization–employee agreement on contract obligations and violations. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 24, 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2000). Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Self, R. M. (1993). Assessing newcomers’ changing commitment to the organization during the first 6 months of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Harsveld, M. (1994). The incomplete equivalence of paper-and-paper and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 852–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management, 41(6), 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Poland, T. D., Premack, S. L., & Davis, K. S. (1992). The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B., Muthen, D., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Labor and Industrial Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Mark V. Roehling

Authors
  1. Mark V. Roehling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark V. Roehling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roehling, M.V. An Empirical Assessment of Alternative Conceptualizations of the Psychological Contract Construct: Meaningful Differences or “Much to do about Nothing”?. Employ Respons Rights J 20, 261–290 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-008-9085-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-008-9085-z

Key words

Search

Navigation