Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Embracing the Contribution of Both Behavioral and Cognitive Theories to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Maximizing the Richness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most popular intervention models used by social workers and other mental health professionals. CBT stems from two very distinct and unique theoretical paradigms with rich histories. Yet, in practice, the full potential of the model is not realized as behavioral theories are applied as secondary to cognitive theories. In this paper, we present a brief overview of the histories of both cognitive and behavioral theories, a summary of their explanatory and intervention theories, and describe how they have been merged to date to create an intervention model. We argue that if CBT truly acknowledged the contributions of behavioral theory, the social work perspective of the person in environment would be more closely represented by balancing the internal mental process of cognitive theory with the determining contingencies of the external environment central to behavioral theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, B. A., & Beck, A. T. (1997). The integrative power of cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Ruch, A., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, S. (2002a). Clinical social work practice: A cognitive-integrative perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, S. (2002b). Remembering the self and social sources of information. Clinical social work practice: A cognitive-integrative perspective (pp. 94–174). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe, S. E., Weissman, M. M., Mullen, E. J., Ponniah, K., Gameroff, M. J., Verdeli, H., et al. (2007). Empirically supported psychotherapies in social work training programs: Does the definition of evidence matter? Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J. (2008). Cognitive–behavioral methods for social workers: A workbook. New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1995). Changing rational-emotive therapy (RET) to rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). Journal of Rational Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 13(2), 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1997). The practice of Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. (1995). Behavioral social work: Past, present and future. Research on Social Work Practice, 5, 460–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. (2004). Concepts and methods of behavioral treatment. In D. Granvold (Ed.), Cognitive and behavioral treatment (pp. 32–62). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2008). Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy: New wave or old hat? Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive–behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyddon, W. (1995). Cognitive therapy and theories of knowing: A social constructionist view. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurius, P., & Macy, R. J. (2008). Cognitive–behavioral theory. In B. Thyer (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Human behavior in the social environment (pp. 101–134). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. New York, NY: Live-right.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1985). The problem of induction (1953, 1974). In D. Miller (Ed.), Popper selections (pp. 101–117). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, T. (2007). Clinical social work and its commonalities with cognitive behavior therapy. In T. Ronen & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy in clinical social work practice (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdate, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler, M., & Guevremont, D. (2010). The process of behavior therapy. In Contemporary behavior therapy (pp. 47–76). Belmont, CA: Thompson/Wadsworth.

  • Stallard, P. (2002). Think good-feel good: A cognitive behavioral therapy workbook for children and young people. West Sussex, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. B. (1974). Behavior modification: A technology of social change. In F. Turner (Ed.), Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (pp. 400–419). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. (Ed.). (2008). Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Human behavior in the social environment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolson, E. R. (1988). The metamodel and clinical social work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E. (2010). The basics of psychotherapy: An introduction to theory and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. H., Basco, M. R., & Thase, M. E. (2006). Learning cognitive–behavior therapy: An illustrated guide. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa D. Grady.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Barbara Early and Melissa Grady declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Early, B.P., Grady, M.D. Embracing the Contribution of Both Behavioral and Cognitive Theories to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Maximizing the Richness. Clin Soc Work J 45, 39–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0590-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0590-5

Keywords

Navigation