Skip to main content
Log in

Safety-Related Moral Disengagement in Response to Job Insecurity: Counterintuitive Effects of Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine individual and organizational antecedents and consequences of safety-related moral disengagement. Using Conservation of Resources theory, social exchange theory, and psychological contract breach as a theoretical foundation, this study tested the proposition that higher job insecurity is associated with greater levels of subsequent safety-related moral disengagement, which in turn is related to reduced safety performance. Moreover, we examined whether perceived organizational and supervisor support buffered or intensified the impact of job insecurity on moral disengagement. Using a two-wave lagged design, anonymous survey data collected from N = 389 working adults in the U.S. supported the hypothesized moderated mediation model. Specifically, the conditional indirect effects of job insecurity on safety performance via moral disengagement were intensified as levels of perceived organizational and supervisor support increased. These results suggest that the threat of job insecurity may prompt employee moral disengagement; this effect is even stronger among employees who perceived higher levels of organizational and supervisor support. We interpret these counterintuitive findings in light of increasingly insecure contemporary work arrangements and how these may give rise to potentially unethical safety-related decision making and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although our study focuses on moral disengagement as a mediating mechanism, we also acknowledge that there are other plausible explanatory variables accounting for the relationship between job insecurity and safety performance, including cognitive and affective-based explanatory mechanisms (Probst and Lavaysse 2017). For example, threat-rigidity theory would predict that job insecurity can result in cognitive failures (i.e., unintentional lapses in attention, memory, or motor functioning; Wallace and Chen 2005) which could lead to safety violations. Additionally, Probst and Brubaker (2001) found support for attitudinal and affective mediating mechanisms, such that the effects of job insecurity on compliance, injuries, and accidents were mediated by reductions in job satisfaction, safety knowledge and safety motivation. Thus, while we expect that moral disengagement will partially mediate the impact of job insecurity on safety performance, we nevertheless expect that direct effects will also be observed even after accounting for the effects via moral disengagement.

  2. The conditional indirect effects and interactions for the remaining 7 models tested were all consistent with the effects shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Complete sets of these results can be obtained upon request from the first author.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2013). Stress in America: Missing the health care connection. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2015). Stress in America: Paying with our health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, P. M., Chiaburu, D. S., & Jansen, P. G. W. (2010). Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 252–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., & Zsolnai, L. (2000). Corporate transgressions through moral disengagement. Journal of Human Values, 6(1), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaranelli, C., & Perna, A. (2004). Meccanismi di disimpegno morale nell’applicazione delle normative sulla sicurezza: Contributo empirico [Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the application of safety norms in the workplace]. Risorsa Uomo, 10, 393–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A. J., Islam, G., Zyphur, M. J., & Johnson, E. (2006). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Paper presented at the 11th annual conference of the Brazilian academy of management, Salvador, Brazil. Insper Working Paper WPE 069/2006, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.insper.edu.br/sites/default/files/2006_wpe069.pdf.

  • Beu, D. S., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). This is war: How the politically astute achieve crimes of obedience through the use of moral disengagement. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 551–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G., Tatum, D. S., McCoy, K., Dobria, L., & Ward-Cook, K. (2004). Job loss, human capital job feature, and work condition job feature as distinct job insecurity constructs. Journal of Allied Health, 33(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, P., Quinlan, M., & Mayhew, C. (2001). The health and safety effects of job insecurity: An evaluation of the evidence. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 12, 32–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carucci, R. (2016). Four ways your leadership may be encouraging unethical behavior. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/roncarucci/2016/06/14/four-ways-your-leadership-may-be-encouraging-unethical-behavior/#5234928d55c0.

  • Claybourn, M. (2011). Relationships between moral disengagement, work characteristics and workplace harassment. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 927–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2006). The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well-being and behavioural reports: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2007). Job insecurity in temporary versus permanent workers: Associations with attitudes, well-being, and behaviour. Work & Stress, 21(1), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 579–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 787–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, A. R., & Shapiro, D. L. (1998). Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 547–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Fontaine, R. G., Barbaranelli, C., & Farnese, M. L. (2015). An integrative approach to understanding counterproductive work behavior: The roles of stressors, negative emotions, and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Goldstein, A. P. (1995). The EQUIP program: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer-helping approach. Champaign: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

  • Hellgren, J., Sverke, M., & Isaksson, K. (1999). A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity: Consequences for employee attitudes and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 44(3), 513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G. H., Wellman, N., Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Wang, L. (2017). Deviance and exit: The organizational costs of job insecurity and moral disengagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, A. H., Watrous-Rodriguez, K. M., & King, E. B. (2008). Supporting a diverse workforce: What type of support is most meaningful for lesbian and gay employees? Human Resource Management, 47(2), 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hystad, S. W., Mearns, K. J., & Eid, J. (2014). Moral disengagement as a mechanism between perceptions of organisational injustice and deviant work behaviours. Safety Science, 68, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1981). Work, employment, and unemployment: Values, theories, and approaches in social research. American Psychologist, 36(2), 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., & Probst, T. M. (2014). Organizational communication: A buffer in times of job insecurity? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(3), 557–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2013). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1075–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, A. L. (2001). Moral disengagement: Measurement and modification. Journal of Peace Research, 38(1), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, Seventh Edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (1997). Perceptions of safety at work: Developing a model to link organizational safety climate and individual behavior. In 12th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.

  • Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W., & Sorensen, K. L. (2008). Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Management, 33(3), 243–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, P., & Sevastos, P. (2013). The development and validation of a new multidimensional job insecurity measure (JIM): An inductive methodology. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitta, L., Probst, T. M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2017). Safety culture, moral disengagement, and accident underreporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M. (2002). Layoffs and tradeoffs: Production, quality, and safety demands under the threat of job loss. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Petitta, L. (2013). The relationship between job insecurity and accident under-reporting: A test in two countries. Work & Stress, 27(4), 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M., & Brubaker, T. L. (2001). The effects of job insecurity on employee safety outcomes: Cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M., & Brubaker, T. L. (2007). Organizational safety climate and supervisory layoff decisions: Preferences versus predictions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1630–1648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M., & Lavaysse, L. (2017). Job insecurity: Implications for employee well-being. In R. Burke & K. Page (Eds.), Research handbook on work and well-being (pp. 123–149). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, M., & Bohle, P. (2009). Overstretched and unreciprocated commitment: Reviewing research on the occupational health and safety effects of downsizing and job insecurity. International Journal of Health Services, 39(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restubog, S. L. D., & Bordia, P. (2006). Workplace familism and psychological contract breach in the Philippines. Applied Psychology, 55(4), 563–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., & Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 1027–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 837–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Størseth, F. (2006). Changes at work and employee reactions: Organizational elements, job insecurity, and short-term stress as predictors for employee health and safety. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., & Hellgren, J. (2002). The nature of job insecurity: Understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999). A discrepancy model of psychological contract violations. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 367–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Elst, T., De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., Niesen, W., & De Witte, H. (2016). Perceived control and psychological contract breach as explanations of the relationships between job insecurity, job strain and coping reactions: towards a theoretical integration. Stress and Health, 32(2), 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. C., & Chen, G. (2005). Development and validation of a work-specific measure of cognitive failure: Implications for occupational safety. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 615–632.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Tahira M. Probst, Department of Psychology, Washington State University; Laura Petitta, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome; Claudio Barbaranelli, Sapienza University of Rome; Christopher Austin, Department of Psychology, Washington State University. This research was partially supported by a Visiting Professor Research Award (#C26V16BRA2) granted to the first and third authors from the Sapienza University of Rome, in conjunction with a WSU College of Arts and Sciences International Faculty Travel Grant awarded to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahira M. Probst.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants were provided with informed consent and could freely decline participation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Probst, T.M., Petitta, L., Barbaranelli, C. et al. Safety-Related Moral Disengagement in Response to Job Insecurity: Counterintuitive Effects of Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support. J Bus Ethics 162, 343–358 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4002-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4002-3

Keywords

Navigation