Skip to main content
Log in

Agonism and the Possibilities of Ethics for HRM

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a critique and re-evaluation of the way that ethics is understood and promoted within mainstream Human Resource Management (HRM) discourse. We argue that the ethics located within this discourse focuses on bolstering the relevance of HRM as a key contributor to organizational strategy, enhancing an organization’s sense of moral legitimacy and augmenting organizational control over employee behaviour and subjectivity. We question this discourse in that it subordinates the ethics of the employment relationship to managerial prerogative. In response, we suggest a different model of the relationship between ethics and HRM—one that finds the possibility of ethics in the contestation and destabilization of HRM. Such ethics arises through resistance to moral normalization and the constraint of freedom and difference. The contribution of our paper is in theorising the possibilities of a relationship between ethics and HRM that does not place HRM at its centre, as chief intermediary of the ethics of the employment relationship, but rather sees HRM as being a powerful player in a set of what Mouffe calls ‘agonistic’ socio-ethical relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational misbehaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. J., & Bartholomew, S. (1992). Academic and professional communities of discourse: Generating knowledge on transnational human resource management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2009). Critical perspectives on critical HRM. In J. Storey, P. White, & D. Ulrich (Eds.), The Routledge companion to human resource management (pp. 52–68). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1967). The limits and possibilities of trade union action. In R. Blackburn & A. Cockburn (Eds.), The incompatibles: Trade union militancy and consensus (pp. 263–280). Penguin: Harmondsworth.

  • Bamber, G. J., Gittell, J. H., Kochan, T. A., & von Nordenflycht, A. (2009). Up in the air: How airlines can improve performance by engaging their employees. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E. (1999). Justice in the workplace?: Normative ethics and the critique of human resource management. Personnel Review, 28(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P. R., Quinn Mills, D., & Walton, R. E. (1984). Managing human assets. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boling, T. E. (1978). The management ethics “crisis”: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 3(2), 360–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and human resource management (3rd ed.). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2007). Human resource management: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Caldwell, C., Truong, D. X., Linh, P. T., & Tuan, A. (2010). Strategic human resource management as ethical stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claydon, T. (2000). Employee participation and involvement. In D. Winstanley & J. Goodall (Eds.), Ethical issues in contemporary human resource management (pp. 208–244). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claydon, T., & Doyle, M. (1996). Trusting me, trusting you? The ethics of employee empowerment. Personnel Review, 25(6), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. (1999). ‘Surviving the rigs’: Safety and surveillance on North Sea Oil installations. Organization Studies, 20(4), 579–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (2007). Infinitely demanding: ethics of commitment, politics of resistance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S., & James, S. (2009). Infinitely demanding anarchism: An interview with Simon Critchley. Perspectives: International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy, 2(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2003). Even newer social movements? Anti-corporate protests, capitalist crises and the remoralization of society. Organization, 10(2), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbridge, R., & Keenoy, T. (2010). Beyond managerialism? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(6), 799–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978/2001). Writing and difference. London: Routledge.

  • Diprose, R. (2003). Corporeal generosity: On giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. New York: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. (2007). Putting Uncle Milton to Bed: Re-examining Milton Friedman’s essay on the social responsibility of business. Labour Studies Journal, 32(2), 125–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P. (2009). Cultural politics of work: New forms of informal control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Sewell, G. (2002). Looking for the good soldier, Ŝvejk: Alternative modalities of resistance in the contemporary workplace. Sociology, 36(4), 857–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2004). ‘You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave’: Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 57(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., Tichy, N. M., & DeVanna, M. A. (Eds.). (1984). Strategic human resource management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2003). Invoking Satan or the ethics of the employment contract. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geare, A., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2006). Employment relationships: Ideology and HRM practice. The International Journal of HRM, 17(7), 1190–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, J. W., Anderson, S. K., & Gilley, A. (2008). Human resource management as a champion for corporate ethics: Moving towards ethical integration and acculturation in the HR function and profession. In S. A. Quattro & R. R. Sims (Eds.), Executive ethics: Ethical dilemmas and challenges for the C-suite (pp. 215–228). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (2001). High performance and the transformation of work? The implications of alternative work practices for the experience and outcomes of work. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4), 776–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & de Cieri, H. (2007). Stakeholder theory and the ethics Of HRM. In A. F. Pinnington, R. Macklin, & T. Campbell (Eds.), Human Resource Management: Ethics and employment (pp. 119–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (1987). Human resource management and industrial relations. Journal of Management Studies, 24(5), 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (1994). Organizational psychology and human resource management: Towards a European approach. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 4(3), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (1995). Human resource management: The workers’ verdict. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E., & Bryson, A. (2009). From industrial relations to human resource management: The changing role of the personnel function. In K. Whitfield, A. Bryson, J. Forth, & W. Brown (Eds.), The evolution of the modern workplace (pp. 120–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2006). Some are call it power. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 754–775). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. J. (1993). Human resource management: Time to exercise the militant tendency. Employee Relations, 15(3), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. (2004). Between ethics and enterprise: Business and management in a bimoral society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hond, F. D., & Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1971). Marxism and the sociology of trade unionism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (2009). HRM and performance: A plea for reflexivity in HRM studies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A., & Ackers, P. (2004). Partnership paradoxes: A case study of an energy company. Employee Relations, 26(4), 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T. (1997). HRMism and the language of re-presentation. Journal of Management Studies, 34(5), 825–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T. (1999). HRM as hologram: A polemic. Journal of Management Studies, 36(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (1999). ‘Are there no limits to authority?’: TQM and organizational power. Organization Studies, 20(2), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (1995). Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (1998). The morality of HRM. In C. Mabey, D. Skinner, & To. Clark (Eds.), Experiencing human resource management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K., & Exley, M. (1975). Authority, ambiguity and adaptation: The personnel specialist’s dilemma. Industrial Relations Journal, 6(3), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1991). Totality and infinity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, D. (2006). HR managers as ethical decision-makers: Mapping the terrain. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource Management, 44(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. (2006). The moral autonomy of human resource managers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(2), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maravelias, C. (2009). Make your presence known! Post-bureaucracy. HRM and the fear of being unseen. Personnel Review, 38(4), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A., Findlay, P., Hine, J., McKinlay, A., & Thompson, P. (1998). The politics of partnership? Innovation in employment relations in the Scottish Spirits Industry. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (2007). Individualization at work? Subjectivity, team working and anti-unionism. Organization, 14(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray, R., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2011). Ethical subjectivity and politics in organizations: A case of health care tendering. Organization, 18(4), 541–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management, 1, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1996). Strategy and the ethical management of human resources. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1996). Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000a). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000b). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000c). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, F., & Carter, C. (2005). The ‘HRM project’ and managerialism: Or why some discourses are more equal than others. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(4), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2003). Against management. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2006). The counter culture of organisation: Towards a cultural studies of representations of work. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., & Ahlstrand, B. (1989). Corporate strategy and the management of employee relations in the multi-divisional company. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 27, 396–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., & Harley, B. (2000). Employees and high performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), 501–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C., & Westwood, R. (2008). Critical representations of work and organization in popular culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. J., Hodson, R., & Lopez, S. H. (2009). Workplace incivilities: The role of interest conflicts, social closure and organizational chaos. Work, Employment & Society, 23(4), 747–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. (2005). The ethics of human resource management. In J. W. Budd & J. G. Scoville (Eds.), The ethics of human resources and industrial relations (pp. 173–202). Champaign, IL: Labour and Employment Relations Association, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. (2003). Balancing performance, accountability and equity in stakeholder relationships: Towards more socially responsible HR practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. (2004). Managing in the post-managerialist era: Towards socially responsible corporate governance. Management Decision, 42(3/4), 601–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. (2008). Ethics and morality in human resource management. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, K., & Gavin, J. H. (2010). Human resource management: Meeting the ethical obligations of the function. Business and Society Review, 115(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, P., & Hiltrop, J.-M. (1994). European human resource management in transition. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, a., & Bohm, S. (2007). Moving management: Theorizing struggles against the hegemony of management. Organization Studies, 28(11), 1667–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1989). New perspectives on human resource management. London: Routledge.

  • Storey, J. (1992). Developments in the management of human resources. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styhre, A. (2001). Kaizen, ethics, and care of the operations: Management after empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 795–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Bos, R. (2003). Business ethics, accounting and the fear of melancholy. Organization, 10(2), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2011). The trouble with HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(4), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., & Ackroyd, S. (1995). All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in British Industrial Sociology. Sociology, 29(4), 615–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B. (1994). Reframing human resource management: Power, ethics and the subject at work. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2002). Justification, legitimization and naturalization of mergers and acquisitions: A critical discourse analysis of media texts. Organization, 9(2), 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J. (1995). In search of HRM: Beyond the rhetoric and reality distinction or the case of the dog that didn’t bark. Personnel Review, 24(4), 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (2000a). The ethical dimension of human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (2000b). Ethical issues in contemporary human resource management. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., Woodall, J., & Heery, E. (1996). Business ethics and human resource management: Themes And issues. Personnel Review, 25(6), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. J., & Wall, T. D. (2007). Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management-performance studies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(7), 1335–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright Mills, C. (1948). The new men of power: America’s labor leaders. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Rhodes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhodes, C., Harvey, G. Agonism and the Possibilities of Ethics for HRM. J Bus Ethics 111, 49–59 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1441-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1441-0

Keywords

Navigation