Abstract
This study assesses the causal relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and financial performance (FP). We perform our empirical analyses on a sample of 179 publicly held Canadian firms and use the measures of CSP provided by Canadian Social Investment Database for the years 2004 and 2005. Using the “Granger causality” approach, we find no significant relationship between a composite measure of a firm’s CSP and FP, except for market returns. However, using individual measures of CSP, we find a robust significant negative impact of the environmental dimension of CSP and three measures of FP, namely return on assets, return on equity, and market returns. This latter finding is consistent, at least in the short run, with the trade-off hypothesis and, in part, with the negative synergy hypothesis which states that socially responsible firms experience lower profits and reduced shareholder wealth, which in turn limits the socially responsible investments.
References
Allouche, J. and P. Laroche: 2005a, ‘Responsabilité sociale et performance financière des entreprises: une synthèse de la littérature’, Actes du colloque organisé par CREFIGE et CERIT (Nancy), 17–19 Mars
Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005b). A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 57, 18–40
Ambec, S. and P. Lanoie: 2007, ‘When and Why Does It Pay to be Green?’, Working Paper, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL), Université Pierre Mendès-France
Brooks, L.J. (1997). Business ethics in Canada: Distinctiveness and directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(6), 591–604. doi:10.1023/A:1005758211031
Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. doi:10.2307/2329112
Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Fisman, R., G. Heal and V. Nair: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well by Doing Good?’, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania
Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach, (Pitman, Boston)
Friedman, M. 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine 13, 32–33
Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 428–438
Graves, S.B., & Waddock, S.A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046. doi:10.2307/256611
Gujarati, D.N. 1995, ‘Basic Econometrics’, 3rd edition (McGraw Hill, New York)
Harrison, J., & Freeman, R. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 479–487. doi:10.2307/256971
Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim: 2001, ‘Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?’, Strategic Management Journal 22, 125–139. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H
Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R.W. (2004). Corporate social performance: Empirical evidence on Canadian firms. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 9, 73–99
Mahoney, L. and R. W. Roberts: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance and Institutional Ownership in Canadian Firms’, Accounting Forum. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2007.05.001
McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342
MJRA Inc.: 2003, http://www.mjrajsi.com/about.asp?section=1&level_2=0&level_3=0
Nelling, E. and E. Webb: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Virtuous Circle Revisited’, Working Paper, Drexel University and Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910
Preston, L.E., & O’Bannon, D.P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: a typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36, 419–429. doi:10.1177/000765039703600406
Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An Application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K
Ullman, A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557. doi:10.2307/258135
Vance, S. (1975). Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review, 64, 18–24
Waddock, S. A. and S. M. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303–319. doi:10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
Weidenbaum, M., & Sheldon, V. (1987). Takeovers and stockholders: winners and losers. California Management Review, 29(4), 57–168
Williamson, O.E. 1967, The Economics of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm, (Markham, Chicago)
Williamson, O.E. 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, (Free Press, New York)
Wu, M.-L. (2006). Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: A meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 163–171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makni, R., Francoeur, C. & Bellavance, F. Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms. J Bus Ethics 89, 409–422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0007-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0007-7