Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of the Mixing Layer Resulting from the Detonation of Heterogeneous Explosive Charges

  • Published:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dense, two-phase numerical methodology is used to study the mixing layer developing behind the detonation of a heterogeneous explosive charge, i.e., a charge comprising of a high explosive with metal particles. The filtered Navier–Stokes equations are solved in addition to a sub-grid kinetic energy equation, along with a recently developed Eulerian–Lagrangian formulation to handle dense flow-fields. The mixing layer resulting from the post-detonation phase of the explosion of a nitromethane charge consisting of inert steel particles is of interest in this study. Significant mixing and turbulence effects are observed in the mixing layer, and the rms of the radial velocity component is found to be about 25% higher than that of the azimuthal and zenith velocity components due to the flow being primarily radial. The mean concentration profiles are self-similar in shape at different times, based on a scaling procedure used in the past for a homogeneous explosive charge. The peak rms of concentration profiles are 23–30% in intensity and decrease in magnitude with time. The behavior of concentration gradients in the mixing layer is investigated, and stretching along the radial direction is observed to decrease the concentration gradients along the azimuth and zenith directions faster than the radial direction. The mixing and turbulence effects in the mixing layer subsequent to the detonation of the heterogeneous explosive charge are superior to that of a homogeneous explosive charge containing the same amount of the high explosive, exemplifying the role played by the particles in perturbing the flow-field. The non-linear growth of the mixing layer width starts early for the heterogeneous explosive charge, and the rate is reduced during the implosion phase in comparison with the homogeneous charge. The turbulence intensities in the mixing layer for the heterogeneous explosive charge are found to be nearly independent of the particle size for two different sizes considered in the initial charge. Overall, this study has provided some useful insights on the mixing layer characteristics subsequent to the detonation of heterogeneous explosives, and has also demonstrated the efficacy of the dense, multiphase formulation for such applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang, F., Frost, D.L., Thibault, P.A., Murray, S.B.: Explosive dispersal of solid particles. Shock Waves 10, 431–443 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Frost, D.L., Ornthanalai, C., Zarei, Z., Tanguay, V., Zhang, F.: Particle momentum effects from the detonation of heterogeneous explosives. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 113529 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balakrishnan, K., Nance, D.V., Menon, S.: Simulation of impulse effects from explosive charges containing metal particles. Shock Waves 20, 217–239 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balakrishnan, K.: On the high-fidelity simulation of chemical explosions and their interaction with solid particle clouds. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2010)

  5. Lanovets, V.S., Levich, V.A., Rogov, N.K., Tunik, Y.V., Shamshev, K.N.: Dispersion of the detonation products of a condensed explosive with solid inclusions. Combust. Expl. Shock Waves 29(5), 638–641 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, G.I.: The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A Math. Phys. Sci. 201, 192–196 (1950)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brode, H.L.: Blast wave from a spherical charge. Phys. Fluids 2(2), 217–229 (1959)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Richtmyer, R.D.: Taylor instability in a shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13, 297–319 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhl, A.L.: Spherical mixing layers in explosions. Dynamics of Exothermicity, pp. 291–320. Gordon and Breach Publishers (1996)

  10. Kuhl, A.L., Ferguson, R.E., Oppenheim, A.K.: Gasdynamic model of turbulent exothermic fields in explosions. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 173, 251–261 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Balakrishnan, K., Genin, F., Nance, D.V., Menon, S.: Numerical study of blast characteristics from detonation of homogeneous explosives. Shock Waves 20, 147–162 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balakrishnan, K., Menon, S.: On the role of ambient reactive particles in the mixing and afterburn behind explosive blast waves. Combust. Sci. Tech. 182(2), 186–214 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balakrishnan, K., Menon, S.: On turbulent chemical explosions into dilute aluminum particle clouds. Combust. Theory Model. 14(4), 583–617 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Balakrishnan, K., Ukai, S., Menon, S.: Clustering and combustion of dilute aluminum particle clouds in a post-detonation flow field. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33(2), 2255–2263 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frost, D.L., Zarei, Z., Zhang, F.: Instability of combustion products interface from detonation of heterogeneous explosives. In: 20th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, Montreal, Canada (2005)

  16. Menon, S., Patel, N.: Subgrid modeling for simulation of spray combustion in large-scale combustors. AIAA J. 44(5), 709–723 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel, N., Menon, S.: Large-eddy simulation of swirl-stabilized spray combustion. AIAA paper 2006-154 (2006)

  18. Genin, F., Menon, S.: Studies of shock/turbulent shear layer interaction using large-eddy simulation. Comput. Fluids 39(5), 800–819 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Genin, F., Menon, S.: Dynamics of sonic jet injection into supersonic crossflow. J. Turbul. 11(4), 1–30 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Oefelein, J.C.: Large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion processes in propulsion and power systems. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 42, 2–37 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. White, F.M.: Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill (1991)

  22. Fureby, C., Moller, S.I.: Large-eddy simulations of reacting flows applied to bluff-body stabilized flames. AIAA J. 33, 2339–2347 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Dobratz, B.M.: LLNL Handbook of Explosives. LLNL Publication UCRL-52997, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1985)

  24. Zukas, J.A., Walters, W.P.: Explosive Effects and Applications. Springer (1998)

  25. Cowperthwaite, M.: Significance of some equations of state obtained from shock-wave data. Am. J. Phys. 34(11), 1025–1030 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwer, D.A., Kailasanath, K.: Numerical simulations of the mitigation of unconfined explosions using water mist. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 31(2), 2361–2369 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abgrall, R., Saurel, R.: Discrete equations for physical and numerical compressible multiphase mixtures. J. Comput. Phys. 186, 361–396 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chinnayya, A., Daniel, E., Saurel, R.: Modelling detonation waves in heterogeneous energetic materials. J. Comput. Phys. 196, 490–538 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Toro, E.F.: Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer (1999)

  30. Snider, D.M.: An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows. J. Comput. Phys. 170, 523–549 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Patankar, N.A., Joseph, D.D.: Modeling and numerical simulation of particulate flows by the Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 27, 1659–1684 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Akhatov, I.S., Vainshtein, P.B.: Transition of porous explosive combustion into detonation. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 20(1), 63–69 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baer, M.R., Nunziato, J.W.: A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation-transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 12(6), 861–889 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Gokhale, S.S., Krier, H.: Modeling of unsteady two-phase reactive flow in porous beds of propellant. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 8, 1–39 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Youngs, D.L., Williams, R.J.R.: Turbulent mixing in spherical implosions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 56, 1597–1603 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu K., Haworth, D.C.: Large-eddy simulation for an axisymmetric piston-cylinder assembly with and without swirl. Flow Turbulence Combust. 85, 279–307 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Pope, S.B.: Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Phys. 6(35), 1–24 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kannan, R., Wang, Z.J.: A Study of viscous flux formulations for a p-multigrid spectral volume Navier Stokes solver. J. Sci. Comp. 41(2), 165–199 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Kannan, R., Wang, Z.J.: LDG2: a variant of the LDG viscous flux formulation for the spectral volume method. J. Sci. Comput. Published online. doi:10.1007/s10915-010-9391-0 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kannan, R., Wang, Z.J.: The direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) viscous flux scheme for the high order spectral volume method, Comput. Fluids 39(10), 2007–2021 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Liang, C., Kannan, R., Wang, Z.J.: A p-multigrid spectral difference method with explicit and implicit smoothers on unstructured triangular grids. Comput. Fluids 38(2), 254–265 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Freund, J.B., Moin, P., Lele, S.K.: Compressibility effects in a turbulent mixing layer. Part 2. Mixing of a passive scalar. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 269–292 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, Q., Graham, M.J.: A numerical study of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability driven by cylindrical shocks. Phys. Fluids 10(4), 974–992 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McNesby, K.L., Homan, B.E., Ritter, J.J., Quine, Z., Ehlers, R.Z., McAndrew, B.A.: Afterburn ignition delay and shock augmentation in fuel rich solid explosives. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 35, 57–65 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Kaushik Balakrishnan

  2. School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 270 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

    Suresh Menon

Authors
  1. Kaushik Balakrishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suresh Menon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaushik Balakrishnan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balakrishnan, K., Menon, S. Characterization of the Mixing Layer Resulting from the Detonation of Heterogeneous Explosive Charges. Flow Turbulence Combust 87, 639–671 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-011-9349-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-011-9349-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation