Skip to main content
Log in

Extending ethical consumerism theory to semi-legal sectors: insights from recreational cannabis

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical consumerism theory aims to describe, explain, and evaluate the ways in which producers and consumers use the market to support social and environmental values. The literature draws insights from empirical studies of sectors that largely take place on the legal market, such as textiles and agri-food. This paper takes a first step toward theorizing ethical consumerism in semi-legal sectors where market activities occur legally and illegally. How does extant theory extend to sectors such as sex work, cigarettes, and recreational drugs? This study draws on the case of recreational cannabis (marijuana) in Portland, OR (USA). Data from 33 interviews, structured fieldwork at 64 dispensaries, and the US Census Bureau American Community Survey are analyzed using qualitative, quantitative, and spatial methods. The findings are compared to 12 suggestions that emerge from the literature on fair trade, organics, alternative agriculture, and political consumerism. I argue that not all ethical consumerism theory extends to semi-legal sectors. Cannabis closely resembles theoretical expectations in terms of supply/demand, prioritization of ethical issues, and pervasiveness of false claims, but differs in terms of who organizes, which types of strategies are pursued, and how ethical products are framed. The differences stem from several pervasive stigmas about cannabis. I also argue that the stigmas that set cannabis apart from other (more legal sectors) and present challenges to ethical consumerism in cannabis are directly related to the War on Drugs. These insights suggest that prohibition (and its lingering effects) can inhibit the emergence of ethical consumerism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Semi-legal” highlights fluidity between legal and illegal activities and is explained in the following section.

  2. This paper uses cannabis” and “marijuana” interchangeably, favoring “cannabis” because it is the plant’s genus and because the US government propagated the term “marijuana” in conjunction with racist rhetoric in the 1930s (Hudak 2016).

  3. Ethical consumerism is not a panacea for social and environmental issues in cannabis or any sector (see Gunderson 2013).

  4. The ubiquity of abuse is unclear. On the challenges of enumeration in semi-licit sectors see Andreas and Greenhill (2010).

  5. Agricultural Justice Project (Food Justice Certified), Coalition of Immokalee Workers (Fair Food Program), Ecocert (Fair For Life), Equitable Food Initiative (Responsibly Grown, Farmworker Assured), Fair Trade USA (Fair Trade Certified), and Sustainable Agriculture Network (Rainforest Alliance).

  6. Drug Policy Action (DPA), Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA), National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), and Oregon Cannabis Association (OCA).

  7. Group did not respond to request for an interview.

  8. Some provided multiple explanations.

  9. e.g., Pink Label TV and The Ethical Porn Partnership (Sullivan and McKee 2015).

  10. A counter example is the New Zealand Prostitute’s Collective, which has been organizing since 1987 (NZPC 2017).

Abbreviations

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

OLCC:

Oregon Liquor Control Commission

RA:

Research Assistant

SMO:

Social Movement Organization

USD:

United States Dollars

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

My sincere thanks to the many individuals and organizations working in cannabis and fair trade who took time to share their experiences, knowledge, and ideas with me. I am appreciative of the time and energy of two anonymous reviewers and the editor, whose thoughtful suggestions made important contributions to my revisions. I am also indebted to Sebastian Koos, who provided tremendous support in thinking about the demographics of political consumerism and analyzing demographic data. I am grateful for the efforts of several colleagues who provided feedback at various points in this project, including Maryann Bylander, Alissa Cordner, Francesca Forno, Paolo Graziano, the participants of the “Environmental Social Movements and the New Politics of Consumption” workshop at the 2016 European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Joint Session in Pisa (April, 2016), and the participants of the mini-conference on “Re-embedding the Social: New Modes of Production, Critical Consumption and Alternative Lifestyles” at the Society for the Advancement of Socio Economics Conference (SASE) conference in Berkeley (June 2016). Special thanks to my undergraduate research assistants Ben Beecroft, Maya Anthony-Crosby, Sophie Owens, Ellen Schwartz, Jesse Simpson, and Jacob Weiss for their tremendous work in collecting and analyzing data and conducting background research; Philippe Brand and Benjamin Falk for fieldwork assistance; Lewis & Clark College for research funds, sabbatical time, and a research retreat; and the Department of International Affairs for providing a supportive and provocative intellectual home. Any errors or omissions are, of course, my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennett, E.A. Extending ethical consumerism theory to semi-legal sectors: insights from recreational cannabis. Agric Hum Values 35, 295–317 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9822-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9822-8

Keywords

Navigation