Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study of torrefaction of empty fruit bunches and palm kernel shell

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the effect of torrefaction on the characteristics of empty fruit bunches (EFB) and palm kernel shell (PKS). The torrefaction of EFB and PKS was investigated in a horizontal tubular reactor at a temperature ranging from 150 to 600 °C, for torrefaction residence time varying from 0 to 50 min. The torrefied products were characterized in terms of their elemental composition, energy yield, ash content and volatile fraction. The present study developed the torrefaction kinetics of EFB and PKS in a thermogravimetric analyzer to obtain the kinetic parameters. EFB and PKS exhibited excellent energy yield values. The gaseous products from torrefaction of EFB and PKS were also analyzed. Furthermore, the study reveals that the carbon content increases with an increasing torrefaction temperature but the O/C ratio, hydrogen and oxygen content decrease for both EFB and PKS. The energy yield and mass yield were found to decrease with an increase in the torrefaction temperature while the higher heating value (HHV) increased. From this study, torrefaction temperature between 290 and 320 °C is the optimum torrefaction temperature for EFB while torrefaction temperature between 300 and 320 °C is the optimum torrefaction temperature for PKS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJ (2006) More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction. Energy 31(15):3458–3470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Uemura Y, Omar WN, Tsutsui T, Yusup SB (2011) Torrefaction of oil palm wastes. Fuel 90(8):2585–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dhungana A, Dutta A, Basu P (2012) Torrefaction of non-lignocellulose biomass waste. Can J Chem Eng 90(1):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergman PCA (2005) Combined torrefaction and pelletisation—the TOP process. Report ECN-C-05-073, The Netherlands

  5. Bridgeman T, Jones J, Shield I, Williams P (2008) Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties. Fuel 87(6):844–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poudel J, Oh SC (2014) Effect of torrefaction on the properties of corn stalk to enhance solid fuel qualities. Energies 7:5586–5600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arias B, Pevida C, Fermoso J, Plaza M, Rubiera F, Pis J (2008) Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass. Fuel Process Technol 89(2):169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson L, Yang W, Blasiak W, John GR, Mhilu CF (2011) Thermal characterization of tropical biomass feedstocks. Energ Convers Manage 52(1):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poudel J, Ohm TI, Lee SH, Oh SC (2015) A study on torrefaction of sewage sludge to enhance solid fuel qualities. Waste Manage 40:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ly HV, Kim J, Kim S (2013) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of palm fiber in a closed reactor. Renew Energ 54:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jamaluddin M, Ismail K, Mohd Ishak MA, Ab Ghani Z, Abdullah MF, Safian MT, Idris SS, Tahiruddin S, Yunus MFM, Hakimi NINM (2013) Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of palm kernel shell: optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Renew Energ 55:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zamzam Jaafar M, Kheng WH, Kamaruddin N (2003) Greener energy solutions for a sustainable future: issues and challenges for Malaysia. Energ Policy 31(11):1061–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D (2008) Determination of ash in biomass. Natl Renew Energy Lab 88(11–12):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horowitz HH, Metzger G (1963) A new analysis of thermogravimetric traces. Anal Chem 35(10):1464–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coats AV, Redfern JP (1964) Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature 201:68–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brems A, Baeyens J, Dewil R (2012) Recycling and recovery of post-consumer plastic solid waste in a European context. Therm Sci 16(3):669–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Velden MV, Baeyens J, Brems A, Janssens B, Dewil R (2010) Fundamentals, kinetics, and endothermicity of the biomass pyrolysis reaction. Renew Energy 35(1):232–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blasi CD, Branca C (2001) Kinetics of primary product formation from wood pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 40(23):5547–5556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeguirim M, Dorge S, Trouvé G, Said R (2012) Study on the thermal behavior of different date palm residues: characterization and devolatilization kinetics under inert and oxidative atmospheres. Energy 44(1):702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabil KM, Aziz MA, Lal B, Uemura Y (2013) Effects of torrefaction on the physiochemical properties of oil palm empty fruit bunches, mesocarp fiber and kernel shell. Biomass Bioenerg 56:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chew JJ, Doshi V (2011) Recent advances in biomass pretreatment–torrefaction fundamentals and technology. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(8):4212–4222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJ (2006) Torrefaction of wood: part 2. Analysis of products. J Anal Appl Pyrol 77(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Medic D, Darr M, Shah A, Rahn S (2012) The effects of particle size, different corn stover components, and gas residence time on torrefaction of corn stover. Energies 5(4):1199–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sadaka S, Sharara MA, Ashworth A, Keyser P, Allen F, Wright A (2014) Characterization of Biochar from switchgrass carbonization. Energies 7(2):548–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miranda T, Esteban A, Rojas S, Montero I, Ruiz A (2008) Combustion analysis of different olive residues. Int J Mol Sci 9(4):512–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Medic D, Darr M, Shah A, Potter B, Zimmerman J (2012) Effects of torrefaction process parameters on biomass feedstock upgrading. Fuel 91(1):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pimchuai A, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energ Fuels 24:4638–4645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uemura Y, Omar W, Othman NA, Yusup S, Tsutsui T (2013) Torrefaction of oil palm EFB in the presence of oxygen. Fuel 103:156–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Grant from the Human Resources Development Program (No. 20154030200940) and Renewable Energy’s Technology Development Program (No. 20143010101910) of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Korean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sea Cheon Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poudel, J., Ohm, TI., Gu, J.H. et al. Comparative study of torrefaction of empty fruit bunches and palm kernel shell. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19, 917–927 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0492-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0492-1

Keywords

Navigation