Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of sage and garlic on lipid oxidation in high-pressure processed chicken meat

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sage was found to protect minced chicken breast processed with high hydrostatic pressure up to 800 MPa for 10 min against lipid oxidation during subsequent chilled storage for 2 weeks. Garlic showed prooxidative effects especially at moderate high pressure around 300 MPa, an effect partly counteracted by simultaneous addition of sage. From the rate of lipid oxidation, measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, the apparent volume of activation for pressure-induced lipid oxidation during subsequent chilled storage was estimated, which showed that the prooxidative effect of garlic and pressure-induced lipid oxidation were additive. Based on electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy radical formation was measured in pressurized lipid and aqueous phases of minced chicken thighs, and a high radical scavenging capacity of sage in the lipid phase was identified as most important for the protective effect of sage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leistner L (1978) In: Downey WK (eds) Food quality and nutrition. Applied Science Publishers, London, pp 153

  2. Leistner L, Gould GW (2002) Hurdle technologies—combination treatments for food stability, safety and quality. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Orlien V, Hansen E, Skibsted LH (2000) Eur Food Res Technol 211:99–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beltran E, Pla R, Yuste J, Mor-Mur M (2004) Meat Sci 66:719–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiggers SB, Kröger-Ohlsen MV, Skibsted LH (2004) Eur Food Res Technol 219:167–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bragagnolo N, Danielsen B, Skibsted LH (2006) Eur Food Res Technol 223:669–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Madsen HL, Bertelsen G (1995) Trends Food Sci Technol 6:271–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bragagnolo N, Danielsen B, Skibsted LH (2005) Eur Food Res Technol 221:610–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bragagnolo N, Danielsen B, Skibsted LH (2007) Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol 8:24–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okada Y, Tanaka K, Sato E, Okajima H (2006) Org Biomol Chem 4:4113–4117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang GC, Yasaei PM, Page SW (1993) J Food Drug Anal 1: 357–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno FJ, Corzo-Martínez M, Castillo MD, Villamiel M (2006) Food Res Int 39:891–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vyncke W (1970) Fette Seifen Anstrichm 72:1084–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vyncke W (1975) Fette Seifen Anstrichm 77:239–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sørensen G, Jørgensen SS (1996) Z Lebensm Unter Forsch 202:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen C, Guidera J, Skovgaard IM, Staun H, Skibsted LH, Jensen SK, Møller AJ, Buckley J, Bertelsen G (1997) Meat Sci 45:491–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS (1957) J Biol Chem 226:497–509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Lebensm Wiss Technol 28:25–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM (1999) Meth Enzymol 299:152–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. StatSoft, Inc. (2000) STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). http://www.statsoft.com

  22. Beltran E, Pla R, Yuste J, Mor-Mur M (2003) Meat Sci 64:19–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dissing J, Bruun-Jensen L, Skibsted LH (1997) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 205:11–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong PYY, Kitts DD (2002) Food Chem 76:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yin MC, Cheng WS (2003) Meat Sci 63:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sallam KI, Ishloroshi M, Samejima K (2004) Lebensm Wiss Technol 37:849–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (2006) USDA Data Base for Standard Reference—Release 19. Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page. http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndll

  28. Wanasundara UN, Shahidi F (1998) Food Chem 63:335–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. He Y, Shahidi F (1997) J Agric Food Sci 45:4262–4266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Lilian R. B. Mariutti is thankful to FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) for the scholarship, to FAEPEX (Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão – UNICAMP) and to CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico). LMC, Centre for Advanced Food Studies, is thanked for the continuing support to antioxidant studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vibeke Orlien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mariutti, L.R.B., Orlien, V., Bragagnolo, N. et al. Effect of sage and garlic on lipid oxidation in high-pressure processed chicken meat. Eur Food Res Technol 227, 337–344 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0726-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0726-5

Keywords

Navigation