Skip to main content
Log in

Immunoassay for acetamiprid detection: application to residue analysis and comparison with liquid chromatography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work describes the fundamental ability of a commercial ELISA to determine acetamiprid and the application of the ELISA to residue analysis in fruit and vegetable samples. The ELISA exhibited satisfactory sensitivity (I 50 0.6 ng/g; limit of detection 0.053 ng/g) and a high selectivity for acetamiprid versus other neonicotinoid analogs (thiacloprid amide). Methanol, which influenced the sensitivity of the ELISA the least, was selected as the extractant for the ELISA analysis. Simple dilution of sample extracts with water eliminated matrix interferences. Average recoveries from the acetamiprid-spiked agricultural samples were >95% using a simple extraction method. Analytical results obtained from the ELISA were comparable to those obtained from the reference HPLC method (r>0.99). The ELISA applied to the residue analysis of acetamiprid in agricultural products is a rapid, simple, and cost-effective method, and could be successfully applied to the detection of acetamiprid before the distribution of produce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4a,b
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tomlin CDS (ed) (2000) The pesticide manual, 12th edn. The British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, UK, p 9

  2. “Kongetsu No Nogyo” Henshushitsu (ed) (1998) In: Noyaku Toroku Horyu Kijun Handbook, 3rd edn. Chemical Daily Co., Tokyo, Japan, p 26–28 (in Japanese)

  3. US EPA (2005) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 40, Part 180, July 1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  4. Akiyama Y, Yoshioka N, Tsuji M (2002) J AOAC Int 85:692–703

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ueji M, Kobayashi H, Nakamura K (eds) (2002) Analytical methods of pesticide residues. Soft Science, Tokyo, Japan, p 25–27 (in Japanese)

  6. Obana H, Okihashi M, Akutsu K, Kitagawa Y, Hori S (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:2501–2505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tokieda M, Ozawa M, Kobayashi S, Gomyo T (1997) J Pestic Sci 22:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mateu-Sánchez M, Moreno M, Arrebola FJ, Vidal JLM (2003) Anal Sci 19:701–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hennion M-C, Barcelo D (1998) Anal Chim Acta 362:3–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nunes GS, Toscano IA, Barceló D (1998) Trends Anal Chem 17:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe S, Ito S, Kamata Y, Omoda N, Yamazaki T, Munakata H, Kaneko T, Yuasa Y (2001) Anal Chim Acta 427:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Watanabe E, Eun H, Baba K, Arao T, Ishii Y, Endo S, Ueji M (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:2756–2762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Midgley AR, Niswender GD, Rebar RW (1969) Acta Endocrinol 63:163–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Research Project for Utilizing Advanced Technologies in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. We sincerely express our gratitude to Dr. Yasuo Ishii (The Japan Association for Advancement of Phyto-Regulators, Ibaraki, Japan) for his profitable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eiki Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, E., Miyake, S., Baba, K. et al. Immunoassay for acetamiprid detection: application to residue analysis and comparison with liquid chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 386, 1441–1448 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0683-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0683-z

Keywords

Navigation