Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comment on “Some fundamental problems with zero-flux partitioning of electron densities”

  • Comment
  • Published:
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 It is shown that the statement made by Cassam-Chenai and Jayatilaka regarding the atoms of AIM to the effect that “In particular, we shall demonstrate that these atoms are not a consequence of the Schwinger variation principle, as has been claimed” is false.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, McMaster University, Hamilton Ont., L8S 4M1, Canada, , , , , , CA

    R. F. W. Bader

Authors
  1. R. F. W. Bader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Received: 15 June 2001 / Accepted: 10 October 2001 / Published online: 19 June 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bader, R. A comment on “Some fundamental problems with zero-flux partitioning of electron densities”. Theor Chem Acc 107, 381–382 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-002-0348-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-002-0348-8

Search

Navigation