Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robust analysis of longitudinal data with nonignorable missing responses

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We encounter missing data in many longitudinal studies. When the missing data are nonignorable, it is important to analyze the data by incorporating the missing data mechanism into the observed data likelihood function. The classical maximum likelihood (ML) method for analyzing longitudinal missing data has been extensively studied in the literature. However, it is well-known that the ordinary ML estimators are sensitive to extreme observations or outliers in the data. In this paper, we propose and explore a robust method, which is developed in the framework of the ML method, and is useful for downweighting any influential observations in the data when estimating the model parameters. We study the empirical properties of the robust estimators in small simulations. We also illustrate the robust method using incomplete longitudinal data on CD4 counts from clinical trials of HIV-infected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker SG, Laird NM (1988) Regression analysis for categorical variables with outcome subject to nonresponse. J Am Stat Assoc 83: 62–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont JF (1999) A robust estimation method in the presence of nonignorable nonresponse. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods. American Statistical Association, pp 819–824

  • Brown CH (1990) Protecting against nonrandomly missing data in longitudinal studies. Biometrics 46: 143–157

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni E, Ronchetti E (2001) Robust inference for generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 96: 1022–1030

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dantan E, Proust-Lima C, Letenneur L, Jacqmin-Gadda H (2008) Pattern mixture models and latent class models for the analysis of multivariate longitudinal data with informative dropouts. Int J Biostat 4 (article 14)

  • Diggle P, Kenward MG (1994) Informative dropout in longitudinal data analysi (with discussion). Appl Stat 43: 49–94

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant JE, Moore RD, Richman DD, Keruly J, Chaisson RE (1992) Incidence and natural history of cytomegalovirus disease in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease treated with Zidovudine. J Inf Dis 166: 1223–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim JG, Lipsitz SR, Chen MH (1999) Missing covariates in generalized linear models when the missing data mechanism is non-ignorable. J R Stat Soc Ser B 61: 173–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim JG, Chen MH, Lipsitz SR (2001) Missing responses in generalized linear mixed models when the missing data mechanism is nonignorable. Biometrika 88: 551–564

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn JO, Lagakos SW, Richman DD (1992) A controlled trial comparing continued zidovudine with didanosine in human immunodeficiency virus infection. New Eng J Med 327: 581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little RJA (1988) Robust estimation of the mean and covariance matrix from data with missing values. Appl Stat 37: 23–38

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Little RJA (1995) Modeling the drop-Out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J Am Stat Assoc 90: 1112–1121

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Little RJA, Rubin DB (2002) Statistical Analysis with missing data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch CE (1997) Maximum likelihood algorithms for generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 92: 162–170

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs G, Verbeke G (2001) A review on linear mixed models for longitudinal data, possibly subject to dropout. Stat Modell 1: 235–269

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Preisser JS, Galecki AT, Lohman KK, Wagenknecht LE (2000) Analysis of smoking trends with incomplete longitudinal binary responses. J Am Stat Assoc 95: 1021–1031

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Preisser JS, Qaqish BF (1999) Robust regression to clustered data with application to binary responses. Biometrics 55: 574–579

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw PJ, van Zomeren BC (1990) Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63: 581–592

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha SK (2004) Robust analysis of generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 99: 451–460

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha SK (2008) Robust methods for generalized linear models with nonignorable missing covariates. Can J Stat 36(2): 277–299

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2005) Longitudinal and incomplete clinical studies. Metron 63: 143–170

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Liu W, Liu J (2009) A longitudinal study of children’s aggressive behaviours based on multivariate mixed models with incomplete data. Can J Stat 37: 435–452

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xie H (2008) A local sensitivity analysis approach to longitudinal non-gaussian data with non-ignorable dropout. Stat Med 27: 3155–3177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yi GY, Cook RJ (2002) Marginal methods for incomplete longitudinal data arising in clusters. J Am Stat Assoc 97: 1071–1080

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjoy K. Sinha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, S.K. Robust analysis of longitudinal data with nonignorable missing responses. Metrika 75, 913–938 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-011-0359-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-011-0359-3

Keywords

Navigation