Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the regional impact of educational investment policies on migration and economic growth utilizing an interregional computable general equilibrium (ICGE) model with a human capital module. The CGE model is developed for three industrial sectors of two regions in South Korea, specifying the behaviors of the following economic agents: six producers, two regional households, two regional governments, a national (central) government, and the rest of the world. The model primarily focuses on structural linkages among migration, university education, labor productivity, and human capital formation in the short run and long run. Our paper demonstrates that the impact of the human capital investment on GRP growth was higher for the 30s age cohort than for any other age cohort, and this holds for both the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) and the rest of Korea (ROK). With the aim of reducing regional disparity and of redistributing concentrated populations, the national government’s human capital investment policy should focus on local job training programs with the target population of the 30s age cohort in the ROK.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Lisbon strategy is an economic development plan to make the EU “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion” by 2010.
We assume there are two regions, representing a single representative agent for each region (SMA and ROK). Therefore, there are two households to avoid a computational difficulty in finding an optimal solution. If the ICGEP model would be composed of 16 households (eight age cohorts by two regions), it could not identify optimal solution due to a computational issue.
This is quite distinct from other CGE models.
The wage variable has to be used as a proxy one for the consumption power instead of total income because of statistical significance and data limitations by age cohort.
References
Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2004) The missing link: the knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4783
Adelman I, Robinson S (1978) Income distribution policy in developing countries: a case study of Korea. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. McGraw-Hill, New York
Berry CR, Glaeser EL (2005) The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Pap Reg Sci 84(3):407–444
Bilbao-Osorio B, Rodriguez-Pose A (2004) From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth Change 35(4):434–455
Blackburn ML (2009) Internal migration and the earnings of married couples in the United States. J Econ Geogr 10(1):87–111
Choi K, Cho D (2015) An effect analysis of regional research and development support policies: focused on Gyeongbuk province in Korea. Int J Urban Sci. doi:10.1080/12265934.2015.1043326
Costa DL, Kahn ME (2000) Power couples: changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. Q J Econ 115(4):1287–1315
Devarajan S, Go DS (1998) The simplest dynamic general-equilibrium model of an open economy. J Policy Model 20(6):677–714
Diao X, Elbasha EH, Roe TL, Yeldan AE (1996) A dynamic CGE model: an application of R&D-based endogenous growth model theory (No. 7461). University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center
Fagerberg J (1988) Why growth rates differ. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg C, Soete L (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 432–457
Faggian A, McCann P (2009) Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British Regions. Camb J Econ 33:317–333
Faggian A, McCann P, Sheppard S (2006) An analysis of ethnic differences in UK graduate migration behaviour. Ann Reg Sci 40(2):461–471
Faggian A, McCann P, Sheppard S (2007) Some evidence that women are more mobile than men: gender differences in UK graduate migration behavior. J Reg Sci 47(3):517–539
Gordon RH, Bovenberg AL (1996) Why is capital so immobile internationally? Possible explanations and implications for capital income taxation. Am Econ Rev 86(5):1057–1075
Ham JC, Li X, Reagan PB (2011) Matching and semi-parametric IV estimation, a distance-based measure of migration, and the wages of young men. J Econom 161(2):208–227
Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60(1):126–142
Hewings GJ, Kim E (2015) Demographic challenges to regional development. In: Nijkamp P, Rose A, Kourtit K (eds) Regional science matters. Springer, Switzerland, pp 187–219
Jorgenson DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1991) Intertemporal general equilibrium modeling of US environmental regulation. J Policy Model 12(4):715–744
Kaldor N (1970) The case for regional policies. Scott J Polit Econ 17(3):337–348
Kim TJ, Hewings GJ (2013) Endogenous growth in an aging economy: evidence and policy measures. Ann Reg Sci 50(3):705–730
Lee S-K, Kim E (2014) The effects of highway investments on production costs in the Korean manufacturing sector. Int J Urban Sci. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.980301
Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(3):3–42
Mathur VK (1999) Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Econ Dev Q 13(3):203–216
Mankiw G, Weil DN (1989) The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Reg Sci Urban Econ 19:235–258
McKibbin WJ (1993) Integrating macroeconomic and multi-sector computable general equilibrium models (No. 100). Brookings Institution
Mercenier J (1995) Nonuniqueness of solutions in applied general equilibrium models with scale economies and imperfect competition. Econ Theory 6(1):161–177
Nikamp P, Poot J (1998) Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Ann Reg Sci 32(1):7–37
Plane DA (1993) Demographic influences on migration. Reg Stud 27(4):375–383
Plane DA, Jurjevich JR (2009) Ties that no longer bind? The patterns and repercussions of age-articulated migration. Prof Geogr 61(1):4–20
Plane DA, Rogerson PA (1991) Tracking the baby boom, the baby bust, and the echo generations: how age composition regulates US migration. Prof Geogr 43(4):416–430
Robinson S (1989) Multisectoral models. In: Chenery H, Srinivasan TN (eds) Handbook of development economics. Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 885–947
Rodriguez-Pose A (1999) Innovation prone and innovation averse societies: economic performance in Europe. Growth Change 30(1):75–105
Rogers A, Raquillet R, Castro LJ (1978) Model migration schedules and their applications. Environ Plan A 10(5):475–502
Rogerson PA (1987) Changes in US national mobility levels. Prof Geogr 39(3):344–351
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5.2):S71–S102
Schachter J, Franklin RS, Perry MJ (2003) Migration and geographic mobility in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan America, 1995 to 2000. US Department of Commerce. Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau, Washington
Sjaastad LA (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 80–93
Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94
Sterlacchini A (2008) R&D, higher education and regional growth: uneven linkages among European regions. Res Policy 37(6–7):1096–1107
Swan TW (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Rec 32(2):334–361
Van Dijk J, Folmer H, Herzog HW, Schlottmann AM (1989) Migration and labour market adjustment. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Waldorf BS (2009) Is human capital accumulation a self-propelling process? Comparing educational attainment levels of movers and stayers. Ann Reg Sci 43(2):323–344
Yankow JJ (2003) Migration, Job Change, and Wage Growth: A New Perspective on the Pecuniary Return to Geographic Mobility. J Reg Sci 43(3):483–516
Yezer AMJ, Thurston L (1976) Migration patterns and income change: implications for the human capital approach to migration. South Econ J 42(4):693–702
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lim, J., Lee, C. & Kim, E. Contributions of human capital investment policy to regional economic growth: an interregional CGE model approach. Ann Reg Sci 55, 269–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0690-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0690-0