Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection

  • Industrial Applications
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the effect of different normalization norms within multiple attribute decision making (MADM) models. The application of the work is dedicated to gear material selection for power transmission. To this end, the general scheme of the decision model is first presented, with close attention to the context of material selection. Subsequently, the entropy method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) are employed to weigh the selected failure criteria and to rank the selected material IDs, respectively. Finally, by the introduction of different norms to the solution algorithm, the effect of normalization formalism on the material selection using the MADM models is studied. A simple multiaxial strategy is also recommended from which safer engineering decisions may be attained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asgharpour, M.J. 1997: Multiple criteria decision making. Tehran: Tehran University Press

  2. Bamkin, R.J.; Piearcey, B.J. 1990: Knowledge-based material selection in design. Mater. Des.11(1), 25–29

  3. Chen, L.C.; Lin, L. 2002: Optimization of product configuration design using functional requirements and constraints. Res. Eng. Des.13, 167–182

  4. Dugdale, J.S. 1996: Entropy and its physical meaning. New York: Taylor and Francis

  5. Fernandes, P.J.L. 1996: Tooth bending fatigue failures in gears. Eng. Fail. Anal.3(3), 219–225

  6. Fernandes, P.J.L.; McDuling, C. 1997: Surface contact fatigue failures in gears. Eng. Fail. Anal.4(2), 99–107

  7. Hofmann, D. 1990: Design and stress analysis of spur and helical gears. Teaching pack on gear technology. British Gear Association, UK

  8. Hwang, C.L.; Yoon, K. 1981: Multiple attribute decision making–methods and applications. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer

  9. Mangono, P.L. 1999: The principles of materials selection for engineering design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

  10. Miettinen, K.; Mäkelä, M.M. 2002: On scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization. OR Spectrum24(2), 193–213

  11. Milani, A.S. 2000: Using numerical and statistical methods in mechanical component optimization. Dissertation, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran

  12. Ognjanovic, M. 1996: Decisions in gear train transmission design. Res. Eng. Des.8, 178–187

  13. Sen, P.; Yang, J.B. 1998: Multiple criteria decision support in engineering design. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.A. Nemes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milani, A., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R. et al. The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Struct Multidisc Optim 29, 312–318 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1

Keywords

Navigation